Skip to comments.
Recall Davis Shoots for 50,000 Signatures This Week
Recall Gray Davis Committee ^
| 04/21/03
| The Honorable Howard Kaloogian
Posted on 04/21/2003 9:40:46 AM PDT by Impeach98
50,000 SIGNATURE GOAL FOR THIS WEEK
With the war in Iraq winding down, and a new Field Poll showing that Gray Davis would be recalled if the Recall Election were held today, we here at the Recall Gray Davis Committee want to step things up this week.
We need you to really press to collect as many signatures as possible this week.
So far we have distributed over 350,000 Recall Gray Davis petitions. And many of you have begun to return your petitions to our headquarters for processing.
As of this morning we have approximately 61,597 processed signatures with thousands more to be analyzed and processed. We want to cross the 100,000 mark this week. With a total of 1.2 million signatures that we need to collect our first objective is 120,000 signatures, which will require us to collect in excess of 50,000 signatures this week.
So please dont delay a minute more.
Go to www.RecallGrayDavis.com right now and download and print several recall petitions. Get those in your neighborhood or your office or club/organization to sign.
Go to areas where large crowds gather. In front of a grocery store. Out in a movie theater line. If you live in the Sacramento area you can go out to Arco Arena and collect tens of thousands of signatures outside the Sacramento Kings basketball game tonight.
And as soon as you have a few completed petitions, rush them to our office right away! Send all of your completed petitions to:
RECALL GRAY DAVIS COMMITTEE<
P.O. BOX 1445
SACRAMENTO, CA 95812
We are hoping that Free Republic members can be responsible for collecting 10,000 of these signatures alone!
You can spread word of the Recall Effort to your friends online with our "Tell A Friend" feature - CLICK HERE
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; davisrecall; governor; recall; recallgraydavis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
1
posted on
04/21/2003 9:40:46 AM PDT
by
Impeach98
To: Impeach98
good work - bump
To: Impeach98
bump
3
posted on
04/21/2003 9:45:15 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(I'm formidable with that)
To: All
Thanks for the early bumps.
I hope for quite a few more to last throughout this week!
4
posted on
04/21/2003 9:49:40 AM PDT
by
Impeach98
To: Impeach98
Can I ask a question? as I understand it, the recall provision also involves the election of the next governor, and there's a chance, becuase of the way the system works, that teh next gov could have a really small plurality.....so, if the Recall Movement succeeds in getting the necessary number of signatures, before they're all verified, wouldn't the Dems in California push for Davis to resign. That obviates the recall petition, and the LT Gov is now governor, and has a built in advantage for the next election....It seems to me the GOP's strategy would be better to leave him in power, and continue to ruin the state...
5
posted on
04/21/2003 9:50:37 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: Impeach98
How many sigs are required, and by what date?
I'm a little skeptical about recalls in general, and this one in particular. California voters decided to create a progressive paradise, and now we've got it. Assuming Davis is recalled and a Republican elected to replace him, wouldn't that just take the heat off the rats and give them a chance to retroactively blame the new governer for state fiscal disaster?
To: Impeach98
Are Kalifornians REALLY so fickle as to recall this guy not even six months after his reelection?
7
posted on
04/21/2003 9:52:13 AM PDT
by
Illbay
To: Impeach98
Are signatures external to the state of California legitimate for this purpose?
I presume not, but I'd prefer to check.
To: Impeach98
Ping!
To: Illbay
I hope so!
If we can let politicians totally distort reality so they can safely be re-elected, we will have lost the essence of a democracy -- an informed choice.
Gray Davis deviously lied about the budget deficit and viciously attacked his opponent to keep voters from figuring out his horrendous record.
Now the truth is out, and the public is rightfully angry at the deceit, lies and total incompetence.
Recall is an obligation, not just a right!
10
posted on
04/21/2003 10:00:02 AM PDT
by
RWGuy
To: ken5050
before they're all verified, wouldn't the Dems in California push for Davis to resign There is one thing preventing that. Gray's ego.
More importantly he has never had the best interests of the Democrat party as a motivating factor. It's all about the little man with the big hair.
Gray will NEVER resign.
11
posted on
04/21/2003 10:00:22 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
To: Impeach98
You need a way for us who wish to help that doesn't live in Kalifornia, to register our signatures. Afterall, the entire Nation suffers from the kookyness that slithers out of Kalifornia.
To: ElkGroveDan
Gray still thinks he's going to run for president. Well, he might still run . . .
13
posted on
04/21/2003 10:03:25 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(Hollings is Foghorn Leghorn? Then who's Henry Hawk?)
To: ElkGroveDan
Wait..he's term limited..so why would he fight to stay, and probably suffer the ignominy of being recalled...is it a "Saddan-like " complex.....he's in denial...also since the dems control the state government so completely..they'd have to be able to grease the skids...or find a "face-saving" reason for his resignation....maybe due to health reasons..like suffering from hemmoriods.....the Cal economy is gonna get much worse befoe it bottoms.....
14
posted on
04/21/2003 10:05:14 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: RWGuy
I guess the thing I'm wondering is, what is wrong with the electorate in California, that they can think this guy's worthy of a second term in November 2002, then want him run out of office in April 2003.
15
posted on
04/21/2003 10:11:15 AM PDT
by
Illbay
To: Illbay
Is the same group of California voters sponsoring the recall petition the same group who refused to vote for
Riordan, saying that a democrat was a better choice than a moderate Republican?
16
posted on
04/21/2003 10:20:40 AM PDT
by
dwilli
To: All
To those who are confused about why a recall. The whole point of a recall is to provide the voting electorate the right to be empowered to remove a harmful or detrimental leader and not be compelled to wait till the next election simply because "that is when the next election is."
It requires a great many hurdles to be crossed to occur which is why a statewide elected official has never been recalled (just local officials and then Supreme Court Justice Rose Bird).
This is the right of the electorate and there has never been a more appropriate time to use it than on Gray Davis. He never should have been elected in the first place but because he was - and then was caught covering up the budget crisis in order to get elected - the recall is the only process available to hold him accountable.
To: dwilli
I dunno - all I know is Karl Rove seems panicked about this recall effort for some reason. He shouldn't - it is the best hope for Bush in 2004... have momentum built up for Repubs. Can you imagine how much more Bush will raise if donors are energized by the GOP FINALLY winning an election (the recall election).
To: Impeach98
The GOP could have had a Republican governor in the Golden State but let Davis snooker them and pick his own opponent.
Granted Riordan is not a far right-winger but He is as far right as we're ever gonna get on the west coast.
19
posted on
04/21/2003 10:48:18 AM PDT
by
dwilli
To: dwilli
Is the same group of California voters sponsoring the recall petition the same group who refused to vote for Riordan, saying that a democrat was a better choice than a moderate Republican? As one of the people who ferociously opposed Riordan, I need to clarify that. Riordan was idealogically to THE LEFT of Gray Davis. We opposed him because we didn't want to make matters any worse than they were.
There is no point whatsoever in nominating a Republican who defines the far left of the other party. All you do is destroy your own party and then lose anyway.
20
posted on
04/21/2003 10:52:32 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson