Skip to comments.
New Java Man as Controversial as Old Java Man
Creation-Evolution Headlines ^
| 2/27/03
| Creation-Evolution Headlines
Posted on 02/28/2003 8:40:10 PM PST by CalConservative
New Java Man As Controversial As Old Java Man 02/27/2003
National Geographic says that a new Homo erectus skull named Sm4 reported from Java raises questions on the human family tree. Scientists differ where it fits. Tokyo anthropologist Hisao Baba and team, writing in the Feb. 28 issue of Science, are trying to make it a transitional form between African Homo erectus and modern humans, but others think it has nothing to do with the human lineage. Ann Gibbons in her Science News of the Week commentary says, Modern anatomy in the interior of this skull surprised researchers. Furthermore, dating of the geological strata in the area is tricky; Rutgers geochronologist Carl Swisher states, Depending on who you talk to it could be half a million years old or less than 100,000, possibly making it, along with Ngandong, contemporary with Homo sapiens. Kenneth Mowbray of the American Museum of Natural History reminds us that anatomy size cannot be a reliable indicator of differences between species; consider how a tall basketball player and a vertically-challenged person are polar opposites in terms of size, but both fully Homo sapiens. I think theyre grasping at straws to suggest that Sm 4 is an intermediate form, he said.
When every new find messes up the theories, its an indication the approach is wrong. Do you notice, also, the ambition to find those illusive transitional forms? The old 1891 Java Man is now just a historical footnote, a misinterpretation by an ambitious enthusiast, as this one appears destined to be.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: archaeology; creation; crevolist; evolution; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; homosexual; javaman
The evolutionists just keep grasping at straws.
To: scripter; Dataman; f.Christian; Heartlander; Alamo-Girl; gore3000; nmh
**ping**
To: CalConservative
The evolutionists just keep grasping at straws ... skulls !
3
posted on
02/28/2003 8:44:58 PM PST
by
f.Christian
(( + God ==Truth + love courage // LIBERTY logic + SANITY + Awakening + ))
To: CalConservative
I remember back in '95, Java men appeared on the cover of every business and technical magazine.
It all turned out to be just so much noise.
To: CalConservative
Thanks for the heads up!
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: CalConservative
The evolutionists just keep grasping at straws. Isn't that what the human experience is all about? Grasping at straws until you find the right one? These scientists are trying to put together a hundred puzzles with all the pieces mixed together and no pictures on the boxes. If history is any guide, I would imagine they will put them together and a better understanding of the human condition will result.
8
posted on
02/28/2003 9:26:50 PM PST
by
Sawdring
To: seamole
Carrot Top, Pauley Shore, Yahoo Serious, Judy Tenuda, Emo Williams and countless countless others argue definitively against evolution.
I think its fairly obvious that if time hasn't shattered, as I believe, its moving backwards. But, more then likely, its shattered and things are just happening at random and our poor minds are doing their best to make sense of things.
Just watch Adult Swim on Sundays. There's no other explanation. Evolution is now irrelevant. Answers are now without meaning. Questions...
My other theory is that we were genetically engineered by cats to invent plastic. 'Cause cats love plastic and why would they, unless that was their plan all along.
"Water sure is lucky. There's two hydrogens for every oxygen."
To: Sawdring
I think the scientists that are pushing evolution are into brainwashing as they have been brainwashed.
10
posted on
02/28/2003 11:16:28 PM PST
by
fabian
To: PatrickHenry; longshadow; Junior; balrog666; BMCDA; Condorman; *crevo_list
Hey, this is a great idea. I think we should have two threads with two different articles about the same findings for all the crevo threads from now on - one for the C side, and one for the E side...
11
posted on
02/28/2003 11:31:58 PM PST
by
general_re
(Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.)
To: general_re; VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; longshadow; Rudder; RadioAstronomer
Java, man.
To: Sabertooth
Java Man says "Thumbs up!"
13
posted on
02/28/2003 11:58:31 PM PST
by
general_re
(Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.)
To: All
14
posted on
03/01/2003 3:24:18 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas)
To: CalConservative
The old 1891 Java Man is now just a historical footnote, a misinterpretation by an ambitious enthusiast, as this one appears destined to be. Java Man has been recognized as yet another instance of Homo erectus, a species that ranged far in its time. If you got that little detail, the answer to "So what does science say now about "Java Man?", I don't see in your posts where. You seem to be trying to say that it is null, void, and gone as a transitional, which would be a serious misrepresentation if you were judged competent to know this stuff.
To: Duke Nukum
",Java men appeared on the cover of every business and technical magazine. "
Heck I thought Java Man was the guy that owned Starbucks!
16
posted on
03/01/2003 8:16:35 AM PST
by
lawdude
To: Duke Nukum
My other theory is that we were genetically engineered by cats to invent plastic...You weren't supposed to know.
Too bad you found out...Say bye-bye.
17
posted on
03/03/2003 8:09:03 PM PST
by
Rudder
(Advertising space available)
Not a ping, just a GGG update. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
18
posted on
12/28/2004 8:38:26 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
("The odds are very much against inclusion, and non-inclusion is unlikely to be meaningful." -seamole)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson