Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election
Republic Brief ^ | 14/12/22 | Kari Donovan

Posted on 12/14/2022 11:39:26 AM PST by Eleutheria5

Law professor Tim Canova wrote an op-ed recently about a case before the US Supreme Court, which is yet to get much notice. Canova wrote that a ruling in this case by the high court could have a major impact- even going as far as overturning the national 2020 election.

“The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens,” Canova wrote.

Here is Canova’s cred according to his bio: Canova is a Professor of Law and Public Finance at NSU Shepard Broad College of Law, with broad experience in law teaching, private practice, and public policy. Tim teaches Constitutional Law II: First Amendment Law, Corporations, Business Entities, Regulation of Financial Institutions, and a Seminar on Law, Finance, and Markets at Nova

Our friends at Gateway Pundit have an incredible, perfectly constructed guest post by Canova on the subject, as he examines the case the possible motives for it and the possible outcome:

While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election.

Here is Canova’s cred according to his bio: Canova is a Professor of Law and Public Finance at NSU Shepard Broad College of Law, with broad experience in law teaching, private practice, and public policy. Tim teaches Constitutional Law II: First Amendment Law, Corporations, Business Entities, Regulation of Financial Institutions, and a Seminar on Law, Finance, and Markets at Nova

Our friends at Gateway Pundit have an incredible, perfectly constructed guest post by Canova on the subject, as he examines the case the possible motives for it and the possible outcome:

.....

(Excerpt) Read more at republicbrief.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2020; brunson; brunsonvadams; canova; electionfraud2020; electionintegrity; fraud; odni; pdjt; presidenttrump; ralandbrunson; scotus; timcanova; trump; writofcertiorari
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Eleutheria5
The op-ed mentioned. Original source is best.
Tim Canova: Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election
21 posted on 12/14/2022 3:45:31 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SFConservative

The voter rolls haven’t been accurate for a very long time.


22 posted on 12/14/2022 4:54:19 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

Amen to that. Isn’t this the case that is only to be considered for acceptance? The is like a 1 in a thousand chance that the USSC would take it up. Ridiculous overhyped clickbait.


23 posted on 12/14/2022 5:08:59 PM PST by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Yep. It will take a miracle for the SC to hear it. They have refused to even consider a hearing before now.

Overturning the election would invalidate every EO and piece of legislation that Biden has signed.


24 posted on 12/14/2022 6:42:58 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every leftist is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

An ice cubes chance in hell of this going anywhere.


25 posted on 12/14/2022 6:45:42 PM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

“This is John Roberts/Bush/Obama/Biden/McConnell/Murdoch(I repeat myself) chance to shove it to Trump once again.”

Supported by Bushites Kavanaugh and Barrett


26 posted on 12/14/2022 6:53:37 PM PST by Armscor38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Unfortunately this is the most likely outcome.


27 posted on 12/14/2022 7:16:51 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Everyone knows they are not going to do JACK, because it would reveal their own complicitness in the steal!


28 posted on 12/14/2022 10:41:37 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

Complicity, not “complicitness”. And they might do something regardless. Remember Mr. Smith Goes to Washington? In the end, the crooked senior senator confessed and helped. Art does imitate life, but usually life imitates art in surprising ways, which is why jokes told by Rush became Dem policy so often.


29 posted on 12/15/2022 2:44:43 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Free country? Good morning, Rip. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

I knew there was something wrong with that, but got lazy


30 posted on 12/15/2022 6:22:52 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

This is so misleading. The case has been conferenced with hundreds of others. It is unlikely to be discussed by the Justices and will be put on the deny list that gets released after the conference.


31 posted on 12/15/2022 9:00:08 AM PST by PatriotarchyQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

well, maybe it’s people who don’t read and only post?


32 posted on 12/16/2022 8:13:29 AM PST by Segovia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PatriotarchyQ
This is so misleading. The case has been conferenced with hundreds of others. It is unlikely to be discussed by the Justices and will be put on the deny list that gets released after the conference.

SCOTUS gets thousands of pro se cases each year. Most don't make it this far as they get rejected by clerk for some reason. In this case, the clerk appears to have favored the petitioner and allowed amendment of the submission. This is a unique argument, i.e., that Congress had a duty to investigate election fraud, although, the venue in Utah is likely wrong for most respondents.
33 posted on 12/16/2022 9:22:42 AM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Every petition is set for conference whether pro se or not. It is fairly rare for a petition to be so screwed up as needing amendment.


34 posted on 12/16/2022 1:22:47 PM PST by PatriotarchyQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PatriotarchyQ
Every petition is set for conference whether pro se or not. It is fairly rare for a petition to be so screwed up as needing amendment.

No, many get "bounced" for not being timely filed, not following the court rules, etc. I haven't seen the stats in recent years, but 20 years ago, only about 30% of petitions to SCOTUS made it to conference.
35 posted on 12/16/2022 9:13:32 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

I haven’t watched video yet, but here is video explanation of this case:
https://robcunningham.substack.com/p/brunson-brothers-make-history-the


36 posted on 12/17/2022 6:54:32 PM PST by NetAddicted (MAGA2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater
Judicial Watch or one of these type of activist Conservative lawyer groups ought to get something in front of the high court demonstrating that things like mail-in month long balloting cannot be verified by election boards, and as such, are prone to fraud.

If this could happen we would have Colorado back.

37 posted on 12/17/2022 7:46:27 PM PST by MileHi ((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

That’s OK, this is important.


38 posted on 12/20/2022 5:11:27 PM PST by Shady (The #JihadJunta: "We are now a nation of Men, Not of Laws. You are not as equal as we are...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The point is that depending on the tossup states, either judges or secretaries of state usurped legislative laws that establish the appointment of electors.

If the court rules that such usurpation exists, then it could and should toss that state’s electors.


39 posted on 12/23/2022 7:58:09 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson