Posted on 12/14/2022 11:39:26 AM PST by Eleutheria5
Law professor Tim Canova wrote an op-ed recently about a case before the US Supreme Court, which is yet to get much notice. Canova wrote that a ruling in this case by the high court could have a major impact- even going as far as overturning the national 2020 election.
“The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens,” Canova wrote.
Here is Canova’s cred according to his bio: Canova is a Professor of Law and Public Finance at NSU Shepard Broad College of Law, with broad experience in law teaching, private practice, and public policy. Tim teaches Constitutional Law II: First Amendment Law, Corporations, Business Entities, Regulation of Financial Institutions, and a Seminar on Law, Finance, and Markets at Nova
Our friends at Gateway Pundit have an incredible, perfectly constructed guest post by Canova on the subject, as he examines the case the possible motives for it and the possible outcome:
While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election.
Here is Canova’s cred according to his bio: Canova is a Professor of Law and Public Finance at NSU Shepard Broad College of Law, with broad experience in law teaching, private practice, and public policy. Tim teaches Constitutional Law II: First Amendment Law, Corporations, Business Entities, Regulation of Financial Institutions, and a Seminar on Law, Finance, and Markets at Nova
Our friends at Gateway Pundit have an incredible, perfectly constructed guest post by Canova on the subject, as he examines the case the possible motives for it and the possible outcome:
.....
(Excerpt) Read more at republicbrief.com ...
Judicial Watch or one of these type of activist Conservative lawyer groups ought to get something in front of the high court demonstrating that things like mail-in month long balloting cannot be verified by election boards, and as such, are prone to fraud.
The result of which is to disenfranchise voters who cast legitimate ballots. If you slay the mail-in dragon, the Democrats will be neutered nationwide given their base’s casual approach to showing up and voting.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4116265/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4116232/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4116139/posts
I think many people have made the point that “overturning” isn’t in the cards. The President is chosen by the Electoral College, the states choose the Electors, and the Electors can choose absolutely anyone they want. That was done and cannot be undone.
But it would be nice to expose how cowardly the politicians were in their failure to even look at the fraudulent elections.
The same supreme court that ignored the natural born qualification for Obama, has no intention of overturning an election that democrats supposedly won. The supreme court is playing for the deep state, not for the people or the Constitution.
My prediction: Mootness
It is s—tty fan fiction - bad blog spam written to dupe low information voters. Stop giving them your time, attention, and ad views.
even going as far as overturning the national 2020 election…..WTF-ever
Very misleading title.
The case was brought by Republicans in the NC legislature suing on the grounds that only they can make election laws and that the courts cannot overturn duly passed bills.
This all came about when Democrat judges in NC overturned redistricting.
If SCOTUS sides with NC Republicans then SOSs and state courts cannot make unilateral changes or tell the legislature that they have no standing, etc.
And from what I’ve read, the law is pretty clear in that regard.
Meaning, in Pa, the SOS can’t make arbitrary changes. Nor can the state Supreme Court deny the 1st lawsuit because there was no injury and the 2nd because it’s too late.
Disregard the title for a moment.
If NC republicans win this suit, people like Abrams and Elias can no longer run to an activist judge to help sway the way the election is conducted.
Think, the Democrats can’t run to a court in Georgia to get early voting expanded.
That’s what this is about.
The next thing is doing what you can to make sure those in the legislature are going to live up to ther end of the bargain.
No, nothing about the story bothers me. You do.
This is much ado about nothing. This Court, under Roberts, with two true conservatives, three radical leftists and four wishy washies making up the remaining Court, doesn’t have the backbone to really take on this issue.
This is John Roberts/Bush/Obama/Biden/McConnell/Murdoch(I repeat myself) chance to shove it to Trump once again.
The President is chosen by the Electoral College, the states choose the Electors, and the Electors can choose absolutely anyone they want.This.
Everyone involved, from BOTH sides of the aisle, wanted Donald Trump gone.
They were ALL in on it.
If the voter rolls were clean, mail-in voting would not be much of a problem, though there is of course still a lot of harvesting of ballots from low-information voters. Many jurisdictions are defying court orders to clean up the rolls or are doing it so slowly that it is meaningless.
It’s asking for cert. The SCOTUS has not agreed to hear this.
It will go absolutely nowhere.
Republic Brief tends to be overly excitable. They could grant certiorari. They did agree to hear the petition for certiorari, ironically on January 6.
You get a lol!
The election isn’t going to be overturned. The best that can be hoped for is that a Supreme Court ruling reigns in the fraud that has occurred the last two election cycles.
When you wish upon a star...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.