Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'll believe it when I see it. But I'd love to believe it. And see it.
1 posted on 12/14/2022 11:39:26 AM PST by Eleutheria5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Eleutheria5

Judicial Watch or one of these type of activist Conservative lawyer groups ought to get something in front of the high court demonstrating that things like mail-in month long balloting cannot be verified by election boards, and as such, are prone to fraud.

The result of which is to disenfranchise voters who cast legitimate ballots. If you slay the mail-in dragon, the Democrats will be neutered nationwide given their base’s casual approach to showing up and voting.


2 posted on 12/14/2022 11:43:25 AM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5
You can believe the two other times this has been posted today, and once yesterday.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4116265/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4116232/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4116139/posts

3 posted on 12/14/2022 11:45:51 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

I think many people have made the point that “overturning” isn’t in the cards. The President is chosen by the Electoral College, the states choose the Electors, and the Electors can choose absolutely anyone they want. That was done and cannot be undone.

But it would be nice to expose how cowardly the politicians were in their failure to even look at the fraudulent elections.


4 posted on 12/14/2022 11:47:50 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (No one is as asleep as the "woke". They define the term "useful idiot".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

The same supreme court that ignored the natural born qualification for Obama, has no intention of overturning an election that democrats supposedly won. The supreme court is playing for the deep state, not for the people or the Constitution.


5 posted on 12/14/2022 11:58:23 AM PST by Bullish (Rot'sa Ruck America. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

My prediction: Mootness


6 posted on 12/14/2022 12:01:16 PM PST by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

It is s—tty fan fiction - bad blog spam written to dupe low information voters. Stop giving them your time, attention, and ad views.


7 posted on 12/14/2022 12:09:30 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

even going as far as overturning the national 2020 election…..WTF-ever

Very misleading title.

The case was brought by Republicans in the NC legislature suing on the grounds that only they can make election laws and that the courts cannot overturn duly passed bills.

This all came about when Democrat judges in NC overturned redistricting.

If SCOTUS sides with NC Republicans then SOSs and state courts cannot make unilateral changes or tell the legislature that they have no standing, etc.

And from what I’ve read, the law is pretty clear in that regard.

Meaning, in Pa, the SOS can’t make arbitrary changes. Nor can the state Supreme Court deny the 1st lawsuit because there was no injury and the 2nd because it’s too late.


8 posted on 12/14/2022 12:28:41 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5; All

Disregard the title for a moment.

If NC republicans win this suit, people like Abrams and Elias can no longer run to an activist judge to help sway the way the election is conducted.

Think, the Democrats can’t run to a court in Georgia to get early voting expanded.

That’s what this is about.

The next thing is doing what you can to make sure those in the legislature are going to live up to ther end of the bargain.


10 posted on 12/14/2022 12:31:40 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

This is much ado about nothing. This Court, under Roberts, with two true conservatives, three radical leftists and four wishy washies making up the remaining Court, doesn’t have the backbone to really take on this issue.


12 posted on 12/14/2022 12:51:02 PM PST by falcon99 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

This is John Roberts/Bush/Obama/Biden/McConnell/Murdoch(I repeat myself) chance to shove it to Trump once again.


13 posted on 12/14/2022 12:53:19 PM PST by lewislynn (Trump accomplished more in one term than any other President in your lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

It’s asking for cert. The SCOTUS has not agreed to hear this.

It will go absolutely nowhere.


16 posted on 12/14/2022 1:30:51 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

The election isn’t going to be overturned. The best that can be hoped for is that a Supreme Court ruling reigns in the fraud that has occurred the last two election cycles.


19 posted on 12/14/2022 2:33:47 PM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5
The op-ed mentioned. Original source is best.
Tim Canova: Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election
21 posted on 12/14/2022 3:45:31 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Yep. It will take a miracle for the SC to hear it. They have refused to even consider a hearing before now.

Overturning the election would invalidate every EO and piece of legislation that Biden has signed.


24 posted on 12/14/2022 6:42:58 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every leftist is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

An ice cubes chance in hell of this going anywhere.


25 posted on 12/14/2022 6:45:42 PM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Everyone knows they are not going to do JACK, because it would reveal their own complicitness in the steal!


28 posted on 12/14/2022 10:41:37 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

This is so misleading. The case has been conferenced with hundreds of others. It is unlikely to be discussed by the Justices and will be put on the deny list that gets released after the conference.


31 posted on 12/15/2022 9:00:08 AM PST by PatriotarchyQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

I haven’t watched video yet, but here is video explanation of this case:
https://robcunningham.substack.com/p/brunson-brothers-make-history-the


36 posted on 12/17/2022 6:54:32 PM PST by NetAddicted (MAGA2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson