Posted on 12/03/2022 4:59:47 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Edited on 12/03/2022 7:07:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
Former President Donald Trump suggested the “termination” of the United States Constitution could be allowable in response to the bombshell report that the Democrat Party colluded with Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election.
The former president made his observation via his Truth Social account on Saturday following journalist Matt Taibbi’s thorough report on Twitter’s internal communications during the 2020 elections at the behest of newly-minted CEO Elon Musk.
The author of the Breitbart article above is spinning (lying). Here's what Trump actually posted.
See posts #58 and 59 below.
The other side always has their attack ads. What they are rapidly losing is credibility.
Try reading it again.
And the left, who has subverted elections, does not care about any percentage of Americans unless they actually threaten their power.
And who the hell are you RINO? I have been on FR since 2007 and I have yet to read one intelligent comment from you. Your claim to fame on this forum is for being a pervert. Yay you! Face it, you are a has-been RINO nostalgic for the days when crooked idiots like GW Bush had many on this forum singing his praises. Whatever value that you had in the fight for freedom is long past. For all I know your lecherous ass is posting from some lady-boy infested whorehouse in Thailand. Creepy, old %#&@!
You spew nonsense like a pinata spews candy, and just like a pinata, usually you spew it after being hit with a stick. You fish-mouthed clown, everyone despises you and we all pray for you to have a lingering and painful illness.
Gun control was the last straw for the Colonists.
Agree...Speaking only for myself, I want clarification of both the headline from Breitbart and the comments from Trump.
And Equal Protection is the clause which is the glue that holds the compact (US Constitution) together.
Without it, there is no compact. And that compact has been broken.
There is no US Constitution any longer.
Sorry Laz, you are dying by a thousand cuts and raging about it isn’t winning you the argument. Take a remedial reading course and attempt to reread President Trump’s message again. Please remember to do this while taking a break from wild bouts of glue-sniffing and self-gratification. :)
I’m not defending Twitter. Only the government can deny first amendment rights.
A very wise survivor once told me that the ability to pause and think whilst the world goes to Shinola was the greatest combat weapon of all.
Then the bastard would warn about being a deer in the headlights the very next breath.
I miss precedented times.
I’m actually to the RIGHT of Trump on many issues, since you seemed confused as to why I might have a beef or two. Wanting to break from the rules of the Constitution because one didn’t get one’s way, without presenting SPECIFIC undeniable evidence of the supposed wrongdoing, or SPECIFIC plans of how such an overthrow or otherwise corrective measures would be conducted, is definitely far left of me.
Edited (Other) on 12/03/2022 7:07:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Reason:
Added Trump’s actual words.
~~~~~~~~
Love it....
Thank you, boss.
There is not ONE fact in your pointless little post. I’ve seen pre-schoolers with more command of truth, you drooling moron. Go sleep with iron slag, you beer-breath stained-shirt-wearing creep.
Reread President Trump's post again but slower this time while your porn movie is paused moron.
No way. There is no way in hell ANYONE would write what you did. Not if they were serious. Your evil and ignorant take on this matter brands you as the “worst-of-the-worst”. May you hang in a just punishment, after you have been found guilty of war crimes in The Hague.
Trump is so imprecise with his words, he is asking for controversy.
Exactly. The government is not operating constitutionally to begin with. It’s been a while since it has, and that’s not Trump’s fault. It’s getting worse.
I realize you’re trying to say a public business cannot deny
people Constitutional rights, but that is exactly what
happened.
Countless voices went silent on Twitter.
I do see that as an infraction of our rights.
I realize there are limitations to this, but in the overall
scheme of things, voices are Twitter’s whole business.
I can’t expect to go into a restaurant and scream out any
bloody thing I want, but that’s not what is taking place
on Twitter.
That is a place where people should have the right to say
anything they want, as long as it isn’t vulgar, slandering
a private person, or making physical threats.
By saying the Government is the only place that can deny
our rights, you are signing on businesses like Twitter
colluding with others to lock out any of our beliefs from
being aired.
Do you believe that civil rights amendments are only valid
when the government is involved? So you believe businesses
can do anything they like to Blacks, because they are not
a part of the government?
That might be tactic to bring out the Democrats to hang themselves when they denounce him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.