Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS Opinions being released now 10am
SCOTUS BLOG ^ | 6/23/22 | Self

Posted on 06/23/2022 7:04:54 AM PDT by 1Old Pro

Good discussion on the SCOTUS BLOG

(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: berger; naacp; nance; scotus; ward

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
I would be surprised by anything huge today, I suspect the jokers at the fraudulent J-6 "hearing" would have coordinated as all these branches are corrupted.
1 posted on 06/23/2022 7:04:54 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The question in this case was whether a pair of Republican legislators in North Carolina can intervene to defend the state’s voter-ID law when the state’s Democratic attorney general is already defending the law.

Ruling - YES they can


2 posted on 06/23/2022 7:05:52 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
First decision:
Berger v. NC NAACP
8-1 (Sotomayor dissenting)
3 posted on 06/23/2022 7:06:45 AM PDT by glennaro (Live life unbullied and unafraid. Choose to ignore or fight the irrationality that surrounds you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Suspect that Roberts is delaying the release of the abortion decision as long as possible. He is still hoping that somehow he can change one vote.


4 posted on 06/23/2022 7:08:00 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glennaro

The underlying litigation in this case is a challenge by the North Carolina NAACP, which argues that the state’s voter-ID law violates the Voting Rights Act. Today’s opinion doesn’t resolve that issue. As Amy explains, it’s just about who gets to participate in the defense of the law.

Damn NAACP, against voter ID


5 posted on 06/23/2022 7:08:00 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Instead of ruling by the Constitution alone Roberts will try to split the baby.


6 posted on 06/23/2022 7:08:20 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale
Suspect that Roberts is delaying the release of the abortion decision as long as possible. He is still hoping that somehow he can change one vote.

yep, or reduce the impact.

7 posted on 06/23/2022 7:09:18 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Scotus always proves just how political they are by holding the most politically contested decisions to the end. They clearly are not blind to it as they would have you believe


8 posted on 06/23/2022 7:09:33 AM PDT by wiseprince (Me,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Looks like SCOTUSBLOG site may have crashed?


9 posted on 06/23/2022 7:09:42 AM PDT by Jambe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Change one vote to overturn
Or against?


10 posted on 06/23/2022 7:10:05 AM PDT by RWGinger (Does anyone else really )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jambe

Still works for me - new opinion Nance v Ward


11 posted on 06/23/2022 7:10:59 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: allendale

He is still hoping that somehow he can change one vote.

**********

If he does this will establish the precedent that the Court’s rulings are subject to leaks, manipulation and political intimidation. I other words, it loses all credibility.


12 posted on 06/23/2022 7:11:13 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: glennaro

It would be nice to know which side won, and a synopsis of the issue


13 posted on 06/23/2022 7:11:29 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Link to list. They’re updating it now.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/21


14 posted on 06/23/2022 7:11:57 AM PDT by RandallFlagg ("Okay. As long as the paperwork is clean, you boys can do what you like out there." -Fifi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Roberts and Kav join kagan,


15 posted on 06/23/2022 7:11:58 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

Nance v. Ward: 5-4 (Kagen): From the Blog: This was a case involving the procedures by which an inmate must raise his challenge to the method by which the state intends to execute him.


16 posted on 06/23/2022 7:12:22 AM PDT by glennaro (Live life unbullied and unafraid. Choose to ignore or fight the irrationality that surrounds you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: allendale

I would have thought that the votes were weeks ago...and that the only remaining issue would be writing the opinion.

But who knows.

I would have thought the Court would issue the rulings when they were done. This “Glen Beck” process of making folks “wait for the big one” seems a little too dramatic.


17 posted on 06/23/2022 7:12:27 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

EVERYTHING in DC is political.


18 posted on 06/23/2022 7:12:47 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Or the leaked decision is not the real one, simply a means to gin up Dim anger.


19 posted on 06/23/2022 7:13:13 AM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: allendale
If the decision changes, then Roberts will have finished destroying the credibility of the Court.
20 posted on 06/23/2022 7:13:28 AM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson