To: 1Old Pro
First decision:
Berger v. NC NAACP
8-1 (Sotomayor dissenting)
3 posted on
06/23/2022 7:06:45 AM PDT by
glennaro
(Live life unbullied and unafraid. Choose to ignore or fight the irrationality that surrounds you.)
To: glennaro
The underlying litigation in this case is a challenge by the North Carolina NAACP, which argues that the state’s voter-ID law violates the Voting Rights Act. Today’s opinion doesn’t resolve that issue. As Amy explains, it’s just about who gets to participate in the defense of the law.
Damn NAACP, against voter ID
5 posted on
06/23/2022 7:08:00 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: glennaro
It would be nice to know which side won, and a synopsis of the issue
13 posted on
06/23/2022 7:11:29 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
To: glennaro
Sotomayor angry descents are a good sign.
40 posted on
06/23/2022 7:28:58 AM PDT by
cowboyusa
(America Cowboy up! S Matter)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson