The underlying litigation in this case is a challenge by the North Carolina NAACP, which argues that the state’s voter-ID law violates the Voting Rights Act. Today’s opinion doesn’t resolve that issue. As Amy explains, it’s just about who gets to participate in the defense of the law.
Damn NAACP, against voter ID
Can anyone identify a voter who has been denied the right to vote?
Still a da*m important ruling because before it a Soros AG or SoS could refuse to defend the sovereign legislatures voter ID and other election law and they were left without recourse regardless of how reasonable and objectively constitutional the law. Now they can bypass the bastards and at least have their day in court.