Posted on 03/23/2022 4:04:00 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
Jackson, echoing many legal experts that had come to her defense, noted current sentencing guidelines are outdated and “[lead to extreme disparities in the system,” noting judges are told to take “various aspects” of the case into account beyond the guidelines and offenders face other consequences beyond prison time.
The judge emphasized she “make[s] sure that the children’s voices are represented in my sentencing” and tells child pornography offenders about “victim statements” she’s received “so that they will understand what they have done” andto make clear that they “are contributing to child sex abuse.”
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Are these statements part of the available data on her? Or has this information been withheld?
This seems like a red herring. She’s a CRT racist and is unfit to be a judge anywhere.
The communists don’t see pedophilia as a bad thing.
A what?
Of coarse she does, she feels she should not be questioned or criticized because she is a black women. period and for no other reason, how dare you!
I wonder what the recidivism rate is for the fortunate perverts who end up with her as a judge. That should be available even if the statements aren't.
She’s just a judge who smites the people she wants to smite and ignores the people who don’t bother her so much.
Other judges are focused on the Law, but she has other concerns.
Actions, not words.
Dems support child sacrifice. They kill babies in utero, and now MD and CA want infanticide-up to 28 days AFTER birth. Then they support child porn, pedophilia, sex trafficking gender fluidity for ALL kids any age. They show kids porn from daycare on and want to surgically and chemically change kids sexually.
The perversion and destruction of SCOTUS, continues.
“I DON’T CARE WHAT IT IS THEY’RE A’DOIN’SO LONG AS THEY AIN’T A’DOIN’IT IN MUH FACE”
50+ years of that is how we got here. Well, they are going to do it in your face and make you like it. Resisting will get you called a name (a something-phobe or something-ist).
Many legal experts ?? Seems fake to me.
How any sane person could support a SCOTUS nominee who undercuts minimum sentencing standards for child porn offenses absolutely defies logic.
Sure. Another blak whining about the large number of blax getting busted. Yet, when we look at the national crime statistics, which demographic is guilty of 95% of crime?
Definitely, let's put this fat, low IQ minority into SCOTUS. It's not like we don't already have the deck stacked against us.
Not sure I support very long jail sentences for someone’s reading habits, no matter how abhorrent. Your reading list might be next.
Someone creates those porn videos.. do you not think the children involved are victimized?
This woman has no business being in a position of authority, particularly at the
place where arbiters decide the fate of law
Many legal experts have said Trump would be in jail by now ...
Forbes is WOKE.
Nothing to see here.
Move on...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.