Skip to comments.EXCLUSIVE: Ray Epps’s Attorney Responds to Claims His Client Is an FBI Informant
Posted on 01/14/2022 12:22:18 PM PST by gattaca
The attorney for Capitol Hill protest participant Ray Epps, former FBI agent John Blischak, told The Epoch Times on Jan. 12 that his client has been interviewed by federal law enforcers and “unequivocally, he is not an FBI informant.”
Speculation about Epps has gradually built for months, coming to a head when top federal law enforcement officials refused to answer questions about his alleged connections to law enforcement during a Jan. 11 Senate hearing on domestic terrorism. The Democratic-led House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol released a statement following the hearing, claiming to have interviewed Epps and that he’s not a “fed”—but this prompted further questions and criticism.
While The Epoch Times was initially unable to reach Epps for comment, he responded to a text message later on the night of Jan. 11.
“Please refer any questions to our attorney John Blischak,” Epps wrote. “He will be happy to answer your questions, as I’ve been advised not to talk to anyone at this time.”
When reached by phone the next morning, Blischak vigorously denied that Epps is a federal informant.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, speaks during a hearing to examine US–Russia policy at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, on Dec. 7, 2021. (ALEX BRANDON/POOL/AFP via Getty Images) “He was interviewed by the FBI in Arizona,” he said. “I was present during that interview, and unequivocally, he is not an FBI informant.”
Asked whether Epps is an asset for any government agency—law enforcement, intelligence, or otherwise—Blischak said, “Not to my knowledge.”
Then why didn’t Department of Justice officials deny any connections to Epps?
“Knowing the FBI as I do, they’re not going to comment one way or another,” Blischak said.
Epoch Times Photo Ray Epps is shown at lower left on an early FBI ‘wanted’ poster, but his photo has since been scrubbed from the FBI website. (FBI.gov/Wayback Machine) Blischak also denied any deals or agreements between Epps and the FBI. He said he’s representing Epps “in the event that he becomes a potential defendant in any action brought as to what happened on Jan. 6, 2021.”
“We’ve been working with the House Committee,” Blischak. “That’s what we’ve been doing.”
The Epoch Times asked whether Epps was under oath during his interview with the Jan. 6 Committee or with the FBI. Blischak didn’t directly answer the question, instead explaining that when FBI agents interview individuals, they typically aren’t under oath.
When asked for a copy of the transcript between Epps and the committee, Blischak said copies will be provided to attorneys of Jan. 6 defendants.
Epoch Times Photo Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), speaks as members share the recollections on the first anniversary of the assault on the US Capitol in the Cannon House Office Building in Washington, on Jan. 6, 2022. (MANDEL NGAN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images) “I can, but I don’t have it. I probably can down the road, but I haven’t made any effort,” he said when The Epoch Times requested a copy. “I first want to get with my client.”
When asked to characterize Epps’s actions on Jan. 5 and 6, Blischak said, “Merely present.”
Video footage shows Epps urging protestors to enter the Capitol on multiple occasions, as well as talking to someone at the initial breach site right before that person began rushing the barricades—raising questions among some about whether Epps told the person to attack.
As to why his client hasn’t been charged, Blischak said, “Because he’s not guilty! He has a good attorney.”
Blischak is a former FBI agent who worked in Cleveland and then Arizona from 1974–85.
His bio says: “In 1975, John W. Blischak embarked on a rewarding nine-year career as an FBI agent with the U.S. Department of Justice, commencing in Cleveland and thereafter transferring to Phoenix. Wanting to seek independence and a challenge, Mr. Blischak, voluntarily left the FBI and commenced a three-year stint as a prosecutor in the Maricopa County [Arizona] Attorney’s Office.”
Epoch Times Photo Law enforcement officers walk out of the J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building in Washington on Jan. 28, 2019. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images) Since then, Blischak has been handling a variety of criminal matters, from DUI cases to white-collar crime, according to his site.
Blischak downplayed the significance of his past with the FBI.
“There’s no correlation. It’s public record. I can’t lie that I was an FBI agent from ’75-’84, but I do not know that when he retained me, that he knew that,” he said. “In other words, he didn’t retain me because I’m a former FBI agent.”
Richard Booth, an independent researcher of the Oklahoma City bombing, told The Epoch Times that it’s common for FBI agents to transition into private practice for financial reasons. He cited former FBI Deputy Director Weldon Kennedy, who wrote in his memoirs about how many agents struggled to make ends meet when transferred to expensive places such as New York City.
“Many in FBI are lawyers and they’re notoriously underpaid, so not surprised to see one practicing law,” Booth said. “On the other hand, it sure looks suspicious.”
Meanwhile, Blischak said he hasn’t issued a demand for a retraction or had any other communications with Revolver News, the site that published the original deep dives into Epps.
“We’ve had discussions. … I personally haven’t been involved in that aspect,” he said.
“They [Revolver] are throwing him against the wall. I know that, and right now I have a meeting [with Epps today]. He’s going to be in my office in about four hours, and I’ll know our future plans after that meeting.”
FIB or not, he incited violence on 1-6.
ok. then why isn’t he under arrest?
Within a day or two of Cruz’s questioning about Epps and other possible FBI plants/informants on January 6th, the DOJ suddenly files charges against Stewart Rhodes and other Oath Keepers. Needless to say, the timing is suspicious. VERY suspicious. We still don’t know the truth about that day.
His ex-FBI attorney says Epp’s isn’t an FBI informant.
This is getting ridiculouser and ridiculouser by the second. (new word creation intended)
What are the tasks to be a FIB informant?
Might one be an NDA to forever disavow any knowledge of the FIB? Like with Phelps, in Mission Impossible?
Informant? Probably not. Paid incitement agent.
It doesn't matter whether he's tied to the DNC or some agency other than the FBI.
His preferential treatment, in light of the evidence, speaks for itself.
The left somehow knows they are doomed to hell. Therefore, they have a free pass to cause harm until that time.
Sorry, they can spin it all they like, but the fact is he
was openly inciting to fill the Capital Building.
Trump didn’t do that, and look at the blame he is getting.
Present tense lawyer trick. Have you ever been?
I know Bill Clinton. This leaves out two tenses, was.... and will be.... and also leaves out your definition of "fed" and "informant."
informants tell the fbi what is happening, instigators get what the fbi wants done through intimidation.
instigators make more money.
Lol...even his lawyer is FBI.
Because he’s an FBI agent who set up Trump supporters..and for that he’s been given the key to the city..if Epps were a Trump supporter he would have been arrested day 1 and put into solitary confinement til today
A “former” FBI agent is his attorney! LMAO!!!
Then ask if he is an fblie agent. Duh...
“unequivocally, he is not an FBI informant” (whispers “anymore” under his breath).
Great. He’s not an informant. More likely he’s an agent provocateur. Which is worse. Based on his actions on 1/6/21 and his subsequent position as someone that the political left has no interest in, I’m guessing that’s what we’re looking at here. He’s the Westboro Baptist Church of the 1/6 false flag event.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.