1 posted on
01/14/2022 12:22:18 PM PST by
gattaca
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: gattaca
FIB or not, he incited violence on 1-6.
2 posted on
01/14/2022 12:24:02 PM PST by
Sans-Culotte
(11/3-11/4/2020 - The USA became a banana republic.)
To: gattaca
ok. then why isn’t he under arrest?
3 posted on
01/14/2022 12:24:32 PM PST by
dadfly
To: gattaca
Within a day or two of Cruz’s questioning about Epps and other possible FBI plants/informants on January 6th, the DOJ suddenly files charges against Stewart Rhodes and other Oath Keepers. Needless to say, the timing is suspicious. VERY suspicious. We still don’t know the truth about that day.
To: gattaca
LOL!
His ex-FBI attorney says Epp’s isn’t an FBI informant.
This is getting ridiculouser and ridiculouser by the second. (new word creation intended)
5 posted on
01/14/2022 12:26:21 PM PST by
griffin
(Don't ever forget. In RW#1, Tyrants were SHOT IN THE FACE. A LOT. Remember!!)
To: gattaca
What are the tasks to be a FIB informant?
Might one be an NDA to forever disavow any knowledge of the FIB? Like with Phelps, in Mission Impossible?
6 posted on
01/14/2022 12:26:22 PM PST by
C210N
(Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
To: gattaca
Informant? Probably not. Paid incitement agent.
7 posted on
01/14/2022 12:27:20 PM PST by
TheBattman
(Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
To: gattaca
Eps is clearly a political operative.
It doesn't matter whether he's tied to the DNC or some agency other than the FBI.
His preferential treatment, in light of the evidence, speaks for itself.
8 posted on
01/14/2022 12:27:25 PM PST by
G Larry
(The "Racism" charge is code for "No Intelligent Argument")
To: gattaca
Sorry, they can spin it all they like, but the fact is he
was openly inciting to fill the Capital Building.
Trump didn’t do that, and look at the blame he is getting.
10 posted on
01/14/2022 12:27:30 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(I pledge allegience to the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
To: gattaca
“Is not”
Present tense lawyer trick. Have you ever been?
11 posted on
01/14/2022 12:27:44 PM PST by
proust
(All posts made under this handle are, for the intents and purposes of the author, considered satire.)
To: gattaca
isI know Bill Clinton. This leaves out two tenses, was.... and will be.... and also leaves out your definition of "fed" and "informant."
To: gattaca
informants tell the fbi what is happening, instigators get what the fbi wants done through intimidation.
instigators make more money.
14 posted on
01/14/2022 12:28:11 PM PST by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
To: gattaca
Lol...even his lawyer is FBI.
15 posted on
01/14/2022 12:28:53 PM PST by
mac_truck
(aide toi et dieu t'aidera )
To: gattaca
A “former” FBI agent is his attorney! LMAO!!!
17 posted on
01/14/2022 12:29:52 PM PST by
Dogbert41
("Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be filled" (Matthew 5:6).)
To: gattaca
Then ask if he is an fblie agent. Duh...
18 posted on
01/14/2022 12:30:13 PM PST by
Harpotoo
(Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
To: gattaca
“unequivocally, he is not an FBI informant” (whispers “anymore” under his breath).
To: gattaca
Great. He’s not an informant. More likely he’s an agent provocateur. Which is worse. Based on his actions on 1/6/21 and his subsequent position as someone that the political left has no interest in, I’m guessing that’s what we’re looking at here. He’s the Westboro Baptist Church of the 1/6 false flag event.
20 posted on
01/14/2022 12:31:37 PM PST by
Antoninus
(Republicans are all honorable men.)
To: gattaca
Lawyer is gonna be technical. What is the new name for an informant? He can deny his client is an informant but because they’re defining him as something else?
24 posted on
01/14/2022 12:36:26 PM PST by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(The kernel of our firm's job is to go with lots. - tnlibertarian job offer letter)
To: gattaca
There is no downside to a lawyer lying to the public in such a situation.
Epps is a fed ‘asset’, regardless of which fed bureaucracy.
25 posted on
01/14/2022 12:37:38 PM PST by
jjotto
( Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
To: gattaca
Re: when FBI agents interview individuals, they typically aren't under oath.
True...
But lying to them is a federal crime.
Just ask Martha Stewart.
To: gattaca
So, he’s an FBI employee.
27 posted on
01/14/2022 12:39:18 PM PST by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson