Posted on 01/13/2022 11:38:54 AM PST by rxsid
SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN OSHA VACCINE MANDATE
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) January 13, 2022
Kavanaugh is squishy. Maybe the liberals were trying to do us a favor and we didn’t know it. Concerned Roberts will also get him to uphold Roe vs. Wade up to 15 or 16 weeks.
I think those preventive protocols are very good, except 1-3k of D is likely too low to keep levels optimal for most.
I would add more Melatonin as well. The key really is to take some kind of fairly good protocol right away. You’re immunity will figure it out.
My guy Zen Master thought both would be struck down, but predicted 6-3 on OSHA, as did Robert Barnes.
Barnes noted that the other fed mandate was due to hospitals having a long history of requiring vaxxes; the policy was mostly seen as benefitting the old and the sick; and religious exemptions were contained in the original rule itself.
Shows Kavanaugh was a bad appointment by Trump.
What was his ruling on the law involved?
He made a legal decision
Healthcare workers where Medicaid and Medicare can be used are subject to the vaccine mandate.
The challenges to the mandate had been made in a number of courts. The Fifth Circuit imposed a stay on the mandate. Thereafter the various cases/challenges were consolidated into just one court, namely the Sixth Court of Appeals. Once this happened the Fifth Circuit lost jurisdiction over the cases brought before it on this issue. The Sixth Circuit decided that a stay was not warranted, which triggered the appeal by some parties to the Supreme Court and then our ruling. Since the Fifth Circuit lost jurisdiction after the consolidation, the matter won’t go back to this court.
Kav is an exact replacement for Kennedy. He will screw us several times a year bank it.
bttt
Statistics can be very misleading.
I am convinced many healthcare workers quietly retired early or moved to jobs where vaxxes were not required (in small labs, for example).
That is why there is so much screaming about shortages of beds and shortages of healthcare workers in some areas.
In addition, many younger workers may have stayed away from health care jobs where they may have been qualified—to wait for the vaccine hysteria to pass.
All three of Trump’s SCOTUS appointments turned out to be mediocre. Unfortunately FReepers blindly swooned over them at the time, and now we’re stuck with them for life.
Whatever you do. Avoid the hospitals for a while. makes sure you have a plan if you’re sick or something. Some of these protocols require IV drips
https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/
it’s federally funded healthcare workers?
Gaffer answered, “No, I don’t think so. I believe that it involves any health facility that receives federal funding. So, they let stand a requirement that pretty much kills off whatever healthcare capability we had to fight Covid.”
Should be repeated.
Who is Gaffer?
The logic is that he who pays decides the rules. Feds don’t pay for private businesses as a general practice so that gets shut down. The Feds *do* pay for healthcare at many hospitals, so they get to dictate rules.
This is the same logic that created and allows gun-free zones around schools, allows colleges to ban adult carry of firearms, etc., etc. - the Feds are paying for them, so the Feds can dictate policies there. If these facilities do not want to have to impose these regs, they just have to refuse Federal money. (Yes, I realize it’s harder in practice than in theory.)
The most traditional vaccine that’s been approved and shown effectiveness is the new Texas-developed CORBEVAX. Not yet FDA approved, but approved in India now.
NovaVax is a new technology - a nanoparticle-based vaccine. It’s nowhere near traditional.
I appreciate what you’re saying but just because the Feds pay for something, in whole or in part, does not bestow on them the right to force people to inject experimental substances into their bodies. How can that be constitutional when there is nothing in the document that says government expenditures entitle the state to control people? Our founders would never have allowed this kind of power, even by insinuation.
Moreover, what is the criteria for the amount or percentage of government spending that triggers such power? That’s not defined either. Its arbitrary.
I believe there’s different standards for that for different applications - and the standard for Medicare and Medicaid is $1 IIRC. Accepting Federal money at all means they get to dictate terms - per the terms of getting the money in the first place.
This is something that should have been stamped out when the Congress decided to impose the 55mph national speedlimit back then and used Federal dollars and terms to get it imposed, but nobody did anything about it.
As it is, if the Feds dictate that employees have to wear a clown suit to work at a medical facility that takes Fed dollars, you have to do it - or stop taking Fed dollars.
Novavax is another spike-protein only vaccine.
I’m not at all concerned about mRNA technology. I AM concerned about vaccines that induce antibodies to only one component of the virus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.