Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court, in 5-4 Ruling, Strikes Down Restrictive Louisiana Abortion Law
NBC ^ | 06/29/20 | Pete Williams

Posted on 06/29/2020 7:41:34 AM PDT by Enlightened1

The measure would have required abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at hospitals within 30 miles of a clinic.

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Louisiana's tough restriction on abortion violates the Constitution, a surprising victory for abortion rights advocates from an increasingly conservative court.

The 5-4 decision in which Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the courts liberal justices struck down a law passed by Louisiana's legislature in 2014 that required any doctor offering abortion services to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles. Its enforcement had been blocked by a protracted legal battle.

Two Louisiana doctors and a medical clinic sued to get the law overturned. They said it would leave only one doctor at a single clinic to provide services for nearly 10,000 women who seek abortions in the state each year.

The challengers said the requirement was identical to a Texas law the Supreme Court overturned in 2016. With the vote of then-Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court ruled that Texas imposed an obstacle on women seeking access to abortion services without providing any medical benefits.

Kennedy was succeeded by the more conservative Brett Kavanaugh, appointed by President Donald Trump.

The Center for Reproductive Rights said the burdens on access to abortion in Louisiana would have been even more restrictive than those in Texas, where about half of the state's abortion clinics were forced to close. It also said the law was unnecessary, because only a small fraction of women experience medical problems after an abortion, and when they do, they seek treatment at a hospital near where they live, not one near the medical clinic.

Louisiana defended the law, arguing that the requirement to have an association with a nearby hospital would provide a check on a doctor's credentials.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: johnginsburg; johnroberts; judiciary; louisana; louisiana; politicaljudiciary; restrictiveabortion; roberts; ruthbaderroberts; scotus; somuchwinning; strikesdown; supremecourt; supremes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Signalman

Roberts is being blackmailed.


Roberts is a progressive corportist. No blackmail necessary.


41 posted on 06/29/2020 8:17:08 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Roberts is a progressive corportist. Corporations support the progressive agenda on social issues. No blackmail necessary.


42 posted on 06/29/2020 8:18:19 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“The Center for Reproductive Rights said the burdens on access to abortion in Louisiana would have been even more restrictive than those in Texas, where about half of the state’s abortion clinics were forced to close. It also said the law was unnecessary, because only a small fraction of women experience medical problems after an abortion, and when they do, they seek treatment at a hospital near where they live, not one near the medical clinic. “

The latter part of that statement is B.S. If there is a problem with an abortion that cannot be attended to in the abortion mill, then it is also usually a time sensitive problem and the woman needs to go as soon as possible to the nearest hospital; and since she is at the abortion mill at the time, that would be a hospital nearest the mill, not her home.

And in general, yes an abortion doctor needs admitting rights at a hospital, and due to the time sensitive nature of any problem that would require any patient of that doctor to go to a hospital, the 30 mile limit is not too much to ask, not too great a burden.

The fact is that too many abortion mill doctors do not have admitting privileges at the nearest hospital, giving their patients no advantage should they need to go to a hospital due to a problem with the abortion that the abortion doctor cannot solve by themselves in the abortion mill.

Can we arrest GWBush on the charge of negligence of official duties, for hiring Roberts?


43 posted on 06/29/2020 8:18:57 AM PDT by Wuli (Get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Byron White, apptd by JFK.


44 posted on 06/29/2020 8:19:57 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Stravinsky
I think the Federalist Society approach is reasonable when dealing with a large number of lower court appointments

Today's lower court appointee is tomorrow's federal circuit court justice or SC nominee. Gorsuch's breathtaking legislation-from-the-bench calls into question all of the Federalist Society-approved judges McConnell has gotten confirmed in such a frenzy over the last 3 and a half years - how many of them agreed with Gorsuch's ruling? How many cases will ever be brought before the Supreme Court - those judges rulings will set precedent and go unchallenged for decades. We need to look for real, activist right-wing justices to counteract a virulent left-wing judiciary, not the "will he or won't he betray us" milksops we keep getting.
45 posted on 06/29/2020 8:23:16 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Jeremiah 22:17

“Yet your eyes and your heart are for nothing but your covetousness, For shedding innocent blood, And practicing oppression and violence.”

46 posted on 06/29/2020 8:25:35 AM PDT by 444Flyer (John 3, Revelation 20, Joshua 24:15, 1 Kings 18:16-39, Pick a side...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus
When you give someone a lifetime appointment there is no predicting what they will do decades down the line.

Earl Warren. William Brennan. Harry Blackmun. Sandra Day O'Connor. David Souter. Anthony Kennedy. John Roberts. Now Neil Gorsuch.

Conservatives have been betrayed repeatedly by Supreme Court justices who their presidents nominated. It's become expected at this point - liberal justices never surprise anyone on the important cases, "conservative" justices break the hearts of the people who voted for the president who nominated them repeatedly. We wonder why blacks would continue to support the Democratic Party after decades of betrayal and failure - probably for the same reason we keep voting Republican.
47 posted on 06/29/2020 8:32:07 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

The original Roe v Wade decision which gave us legalized baby murder was written by Nixon appointee Harry Blackmun and Nixon appointee Chief Justice Warren Burger voted in favor.
Strangely, Barack Obama had a lot of turncoat rulings. 41 times the Supreme Court issued UNANIMOUS rulings against Obama, 9-0 which means both of his appointees, Sotomayor and Kagan voted against him and with the conservatives at least 41 times.
Reagan appointee Sandra Day O’Connor helped give us affirmative action and Eisenhower appointee Earl Warren became one of the most liberal Chief Justices, particularly on blacks’ civil rights versus states’ rights.


48 posted on 06/29/2020 8:33:50 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

He is willingly doing satan’s bidding. Proverbs 1:7
The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline. I guess this verse defines Roberts.


49 posted on 06/29/2020 8:34:59 AM PDT by Maudeen (www.thereishopeinJesus.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigB60
Senate should draft impeachment proceedings just to put him on notice. They won’t impeach but it would be a severe rebuke nonetheless.

Only the House can draft impeachment proceedings.

50 posted on 06/29/2020 8:35:53 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Gorsuch’s breathtaking legislation-from-the-bench calls into question all of the Federalist Society-approved judges McConnell has gotten confirmed in such a frenzy over the last 3 and a half years - how many of them agreed with Gorsuch’s ruling?


Exactly. It’s always been a fools errand to count GOP judge chickens. The only reason these “Trump judges” are touted so much is because the GOP Congress has delivered basically none of the GOP platform agenda to President Trump’s desk.


51 posted on 06/29/2020 8:44:28 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

That’s hard to do with Speaker Pelosi and a 233-198 Democrat majority in the House.


52 posted on 06/29/2020 8:49:46 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

“George W. Bush was THE WORST president until Obama and even then ties with Obama. Roberts demonstrates that.”

Well to be fair he did give us Alito, but Roberts has been a major flop.


53 posted on 06/29/2020 8:58:37 AM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1; All
"What happened to the State Rights and the 9th and 10th Amendment?"

The bottom line is that parents are not making sure that their children are being taught about the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers versus 10th Amendment-protected state sovereignty.

54 posted on 06/29/2020 9:07:08 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: Enlightened1

The Bush family has been a scourge on this country for going on three decades now.


56 posted on 06/29/2020 9:19:31 AM PDT by Antoninus (The press has lost the ability to persuade. They retain the ability to foment a panic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“So this is why Louisiana copied the Texas law, and now Roberts flips his own vote.”

Roberts could afford to hide the last time. This time, he had to come out in the open. Am I wrong to wish he has a heart attack?


57 posted on 06/29/2020 9:22:59 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


58 posted on 06/29/2020 9:28:21 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Roberts MUST be EXPOSED for the FRAUD he is!

Hasn't he already done that on numerous times?

59 posted on 06/29/2020 9:29:49 AM PDT by del griffith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: del griffith

I’m talking about his SCANDAL!


60 posted on 06/29/2020 9:38:27 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson