Posted on 06/29/2020 9:11:36 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
Breyer authored the majority opinion.
Roberts wrote his own Concurring opinion. Begins on page 46.
Thomas wrote the dissent. Page 62
Alito wrote his own dissent. Page 82
Gorsuch wrote his own dissent Page 116.
June Medical Services v. Russo:
considered a law that required physicians who provide abortion care to secure admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of their practice.
does this mean that now we can bring a third party advocacy case to the supreme court on behalf of the unborn children?
i think it does.
and now thanks to CJ Roberts, we have standing.
...
Up next, abortion providers no longer need to be medical doctors. That is an excessive burden on women.
Kavanaugh also wrote a 2-page dissent. Page 137
I read much of Roberts. Gorsuch was excellent. Thorough & brutal ... picks apart Roberts/Breyer.
kagan and sotomayer both said this in their briefs... er, what she said.(RGB)
Roberts is either a snake in the grass, orrrr, he’s under duress to rule the way he does, AND is a snake in the grass. Those three 2D libs on the court have to be replaced, and soon, and it won’t matter what the turncoat Roberts does.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3860311/posts?page=12#12
Yes, he was very good. I think he missed the opportunity to jam a stick in Roberts' spokes by citing Roberts' 'reasoning' in NFIB vs. Sebelius (Ebolacare mandate challenge), where he said "Ebolacare is bad law, but you elected these guys, so it's your problem".
The contrast highlights what a whore Roberts is. He'll be deferential, or not, depending on which gives the liberal outcome. He'll also vote conservative, so long as there are 5 others in favor of the liberal outcome. Just like in Whole Women's Health he cited at the beginning of his concurrence, he voted anti-abortion, but golly, not when it was the deciding vote. Always willing to give lip service to logic, so long as it's JUSSSST too little to sway the decision. Whore.
Eww. Have to bleach my mind’s eye now.
And today, the plurality reaffirms our precedent allowing beer vendors to assert the Fourteenth Amendment rights of their potential customers. Ante, at 14 (citing Craig v. Boren, 429 U. S. 190, 192 (1976)). But it is fair to wonder whether gun vendors could expect to receive the same privilege if they seek to vindicate the Second Amendment rights of their customers. Given this Court’s ad hoc approach to third-party standing and its tendency to treat the Second Amendment as a second-class right, their time would be better spent waiting for Godot.
.
Roberts: in his confirmation hearing, made it clear that he was a Roberts-ian. He told us that this was his approach.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4545857/user-clip-roberts-stare-decisis
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.