Skip to comments.The unmasking of Joe Biden
Posted on 05/14/2020 9:06:43 AM PDT by bitt
The declassification of material from the Michael Flynn case has exposed more chilling details of a concerted effort by prosecutors to come up with any crime to use against the former national security adviser. This week, however, a letter revealed a new unsettling detail. Among more than three dozen Obama administration officials asking to unmask Flynn from the investigation was former Vice President Joe Biden. This revelation came less than 24 hours after Biden denied any involvement in the investigation of Flynn. It also follows a disclosure that President Obama was following that investigation.
For three years, many in the media have expressed horror at the idea of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election. We now know there never was credible evidence of such collusion. In recently released transcripts, a long list of Obama administration officials admitted they never saw any evidence of such collusion none. That included the testimony of Evelyn Farkas, a former Obama national security adviser who was widely quoted in her public plea for Congress to gather the evidence that she learned of as part of the Obama administration.
The media widely covered her alarm that this evidence would be lost if they found out how we knew what we knew about their, the staff, the Trump staffs, dealing with Russians. Yet, in her previously classified testimony under oath, she repeatedly said I didnt know anything. (Farkas is now running for Congress in New York and highlighting her role in raising the alarm over Russian collusion.)
As much of the media blindly pushed the Russian collusion story, a truly alarming story has unfolded in plain view: the use of national security power to investigate an opposing political party and opponents. There is
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
“...the use of national security power to investigate an opposing political party and opponents.”
But it’s so, so much more than that. It is conspiracy to undermine the duly elected President of the United States and his administration.
This is not just political party shenanigans...its a coup.
Dumb question, but when you ask to “unmask” someone is it:
1. Please give me all the calls involving Gen. Flynn or is it
2. Please tell me who US Person No. 1 is in this call transcript I am looking at.
Or can it be both?
Grenell must have been watching that interview with Biden, which prompted him to say oh no you don't get away with that lie. 8>)
Blast this/these traitorous b@s-turds!
Thanks again, Jonathan Turley.
Salute ya. Professor Turley.
But none of this matters. A Democratic administration using a secret national security court to investigate the opposing partys campaign simply does not matter to Democrats in Congress or many in the media anyway. An investigation continuing despite the lack of any credible information supporting collusion does not matter to them either. A president and vice president taking personal interest in surveillance of political opponents? It does not matter.
This is the most important part of the article, the media can’t find a story in such a small matter as a sitting president and his vice president using intelligence agencies to investigate political opponents. After all, don’t all political parties in power use their Stasi to investigate their opponents?
I hope there is a whole call center of media watchers who are tuned-in and turn-on the the stinking spin coming out of the DNC/Media collective.
Sure wish a crafty gamer would create an updated version of Hollywood Squares and put the Donkey Support Team in the boxes with memorable quotes.
Demented liar Biden. The best the Progressives have?
Lets be factual. First, Biden said he didn't know anything about the investigation into Mr. Flynn. Only after Stephie told him he was in the January 5th 2017 meeting that Biden then backtracked and lied on camera that he thought Stephie asked him about the Flynn prosecution and then said he knew there was an investigation, but that that was all he knew. If Joe thought Stephie originally asked him about the prosecution, why would Biden respond with "I didn't know anything about the investigation" into Mr. Flynn. Is he that far gone with dementia? Or, is this the same ole lying Joe we've known for 50 years?
When you post Turley could you put his name in the headline? I don’t want to miss anything he puts out... Thanks bitt..
We do it with Greenfield too...