Posted on 12/25/2019 6:37:11 PM PST by robowombat
UN demands that British army send more women for defense against jihad in Mali
DEC 25, 2019 11:00 AM BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
“The United Nations has placed strict gender quotas on a British Army peacekeeping deployment to Mali in west Africa, demanding more females are sent under the auspices of a special bureaucratic directive….The call for more female UK soldiers to be included is part of a wider set of directives drafted by the U.N. that mandates strict quotas for female personnel in the name of equal opportunity.”
The UN is forcing the issue of more women in the British army to fight African jihadis under the disguise of gender equality. The mission has been described as “the most dangerous mission for British forces since Afghanistan.” What is the UN really up to, particularly given its alliance with the Organization Islamic Cooperation, which aims to subvert the Houses of War (infidel countries)?
Given the brutality of this war, combined with how normative Islam views infidel enemy women (inferiors and to be taken as sex slaves), of which the UN is well aware, this implies a nefarious agenda.
The UN has never attempted to impose gender equality across the board, including in Islamic states. Its “strict gender quotas on a British Army peacekeeping deployment to Mali in west Africa, demanding more females are sent under the auspices of a special bureaucratic directive” is highly questionable.
“U.N. Imposes Strict Gender Quotas on British Army for Africa Jihadi Fight,” by Simon Kent, Breitbart, December 22, 2019:
The United Nations has placed strict gender quotas on a British Army peacekeeping deployment to Mali in west Africa, demanding more females are sent under the auspices of a special bureaucratic directive.
At least 250 soldiers are expected to join the U.N. peacekeeping force helping France to contain the deadly Islamist jihadi threat in the disputed Sahel region, the Daily Express reports.
The call for more female UK soldiers to be included is part of a wider set of directives drafted by the U.N. that mandates strict quotas for female personnel in the name of equal opportunity.
Under Uniformed Gender Parity Strategy targets, 15 percent of military observers and staff officers must be women by next year, while the figure for female “boots on the ground” is 7.5 percent.
It means the British Army will have to field at least 18 female soldiers in order to comply during the Mali deployment.
Senior planners involved with preparing for the mission expressed their fury.
“The British Army embraces gender equality. We feel it’s the right thing, and a good thing,” one senior officer told the newspaper.
“But equality cuts both ways. This is about our ability, as planners, to choose the most appropriate soldiers for the task at hand, be they men or women.
“It’s true that we are joining a U.N. peacekeeping operation, and not France’s parallel mission. However, we anticipate that this will be a highly kinetic operation.”
The officer questioned whether bureaucrats sitting in their offices in the U.N. building in New York rather than being out in the field have any notion of the absurdity of the request.
“Frankly, to be forced to comply with a tick-boxing request which doesn’t address the immediate realities of the challenges we face is ludicrous.”
Tell them to f_ck off.
How involved is the UN in the current sex trafficking operations happening around the world? Just asking...
The UN’s record of peacekeeping in Africa is horrendous.
Why? Did they run out of women to rape?
Well, maybe it’s not a ‘hoax’.
But: When are we finally going to get rid of the UN as a completely useless organisation?
When did it ever positively resolve any situation where human beings were being harmed? When did it last result in anything useful at all?
Screw that globalist Islamist cabal.
>> Why? Did they run out of women to rape?
From an Army chaplain friend: “
ALL, repeat ALL women captured in combat are raped.”
Nature pretty much protects the female, not the male. The UN and most liberals are anti-nature. Idiots.
they probably get a cut or are actually running the thing.
It is far past time for the United Nations to go the way of its predecessor The League of Nations and for the same reasons.
Oh my, two international organizations designed to “help” the world and fail miserably at it and both were created by American Democrats.
I’m glimpsing a pattern here . . .
Eternally warring members of hellholes need to fight their own wars without the help of civilized countries. If we insisted on that the wars would end.
The UN has a history of raping Peace Corps women.
Guess they want to expand the selection.
Tell them the UK will determine the makeup of their forces, if any.
Pagin Miss Warren, paging Miss Warren. Time to prove your vicious Indian heritage in real life.
Tell them to go to hell, BoJo!
What an odd request. I agree with the previous poster...they ran out of Western women to rape.
Why? Did they run out of women to rape?
*************************************
My thoughts exactly.
Well, while you’re busy with Brexit, I know a good two for 1 deal...
Honestly, the only response to such directives is ‘the United Kingdom will make force determinations of our deployments as we please.’
What is the UN going to do, deploy their own troops...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.