Posted on 12/21/2019 11:47:11 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
The publication is small, reaching just a fraction of the evangelical movement.
But when Christianity Today called for President Trump’s removal in a blistering editorial on Thursday, it met the full force and fury of the president and his most prominent allies in the Christian conservative world. If the response seemed disproportionate, it vividly reflected the fact that white evangelicals are the cornerstone of Mr. Trump’s political base and their leaders are among his most visible and influential supporters.
In the background, however, is a more nuanced reality that Christianity Today’s editorial hints at: a number of conservative Christians remain deeply uncomfortable with an alliance with the president.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Christianity Today has been mainstream liberal for at least 20 years.
[[[In the background, however, is a more nuanced reality that Christianity Today’s editorial hints at: a number of conservative Christians remain deeply uncomfortable with an alliance with the president.]]]]
Lets play manufacture a narrative.
Attacking Trump never works.
I call BS on this story, with an extra fat bull.
Well the last narrative deflated so completely.
Ever the race-baiters at the NYT. They hate whites, and especially white christians.
And for remedial schooling on the Ninth Commandment, that “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” The CT editorial was based on and repeated a host of false accusations against Donald Trump from his enemies.
So would the editor at CT have voted for David ben-Jesse (King David) who was a murderer, polygamist and once danced naked in public?
What about his son Soloman who was a well-known ladies man and occasionally worshipped idols?
Moses, he killed the Egyptian slave driver.
St. Paul, was an accomplice in the murder of Stephen.
Peter denied Christ and cussed up a storm doing so.
Exactly which of the Biblical patriarchs was more presidential or less sinful than Donald Trump?
To say Trump should not have been elected and that The PIAPS with her baby-killing, F****t F*****g, corruption filled agenda would have been the more “Holy” choice is simply insane.
NYT: “...a number of conservative Christians remain deeply uncomfortable with an alliance with the president.”
A number can mean anywhere from one to several to millions. Note how the editorialist also writes “deeply uncomfortable” rather than just uncomfortable. That said, I’m sure “several” conservative Christians (out of tens of millions) are “deeply uncomfortable” with Trump, but I dare say they are a very, very tiny minority. Most likely these are Christians who still rely on the slanted media for news.
God is closing Truth onto the lies of the evil one.
The author of this tripe is probably all in for genocide on real Christians.
When Christ named “the Rock upon which I will build my Church,” on the other hand, He didn’t select John for the task. Instead, He chose Simon Peter — perhaps the most flawed apostle of them all. He was ill-tempered, impulsive, wavering in his faith, and not averse to drawing his sword (and using it) in the Garden of Gethsemane.
“white evangelicals” Exactly what the NYT despises!
“Past time for a new editor at Christianity Today”
It went Left a long time ago. Better that it should go out of business.
They were wretched in the 60’s.
“ a number of conservative Christians remain deeply uncomfortable with an alliance with the president.”
Psychological warfare, and all of us are the target.
MSN, NYT, CT and the rest are enemy combatants.
The cancer of leftism seeps into everything today, even the Vatican.
Concerning Christianity Today, it would seem that the established Christian world is subject to the same slippery left-sliding slope as the world. Kinda like the scribes’ and the Pharisees’ religious establishment of old.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.