Actually, yes it does. This guy is an obtuse moron.
The Prisoners in the Gulags cried when Stalin died.
So, this is the type of insight that Chris thinks is appropriate for a “reporter”?
Face it Chris...you hate Trump and are a card carrying member of the lying Democrat Media!
These journalists should be hanged for their roll in this coup!
Ah, a revision of the “fake but accurate” meme...
If William Barr's DOJ secured a FISA warrant on him he'd be on the air 24/7 calling for Barr and Trump to be tried, convicted and executed within a week ... even if the DOJ was 100% truthful in the FISA application process.
When Chris Wallace says “mean tweets by Trump don’t mean he colluded with Russia, obstructed justice, or should be impeached” I’ll believe his sudden desire to give the benefit of the doubt isn’t driven by a biased agenda.
“Wallace said, “Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a political bias there?”
Chris Wallace never misses an opportunity to totally miss the point. Bias in this case is a ‘given’.
Good point, Chris. I’m sure there’s a perfectly logical reason why they fabricated material to get the FISA warrant. Sure, one reason to fabricate material is to get a warrant to investigate something for which there is no evidence just because you want cover to spy. But surely there are other reasons, just come up with a few and tell us about them Chris.
Yet, the hypocrite never gave Trump the benefit of the doubt.
F^^K Chris Wallace!
The libs and media (redundant) main claim now is that the (low) standard at the FBI for predication was met, thus the investigation was justified and not a “witch hunt” as Trump has claimed.
The very first comment from AG Barr was that he disagreed with the IG’s conclusion about predication.
Think logically. Horowitz only knows and his report only reflects what DOJ and FBI employees told him. “No documentary or testimonial evidence” means not one confessed, no one produced written proof, and no one was willing to rat out anyone else.
I’ve seen this situation since grade school, when the teacher asks “who did it” and all you hear are crickets. But after the Principal is brought in, parents are called, etc., the truth finally comes out.
Barr and Durham know everything that Horowitz knew because they read his report. But they also know a lot more that Horowitz does not.
Now consider the importance of Barr’s statement of disagreement. He clearly knows other evidence exists that will bring out the truth that the DOJ/FBI employees hid from Horowitz.
It will come when Durham’s findings are made public and when it does, even this one claim of the MSM/liberal establishment about predication will be reduced to smoking ash.
And they know it.
The big question remains....Why didn’t Obama tell then candidate Trump
Who gives a damn what he thinks
If it was legit, there is no reason to commit felonies to get it approved, or continue it.
Felonies! - not typographical errors - felonies!
What is it, with that name?
Chris Wallass and Nichole Wallass...
There’s still a part of me that’s uncomfortable with Carter Page...
Chris Wallace hates us (Deplorable AND Trump) and he never makes an honest effort to ‘be fair’... so why would he do it with Carter Page? Has the feel of a possible red flag.
Motive or bias is not an element of the crime itself. It is absurd to state that bias must be proved “beyond a reasonable doubt” because, in fact, it doesn’t have to be proved at all. Unless the defendant makes an admission of any kind of motive, there’s actually no way to determine one - and it doesn’t matter. Courts convict on acts, not motives for those acts.
“...anchor Chris Wallace ...”
Poor Chris... he works SO hard at being a Useful Idiot and a Tool.
It shows.
Yeah, that's pretty much exactly what it means.