The fix was in.
There are many parts of ourcountry where the IQ of the average jury member equals that of an average 10-year-old.
Grounds fror mistrial.
Sounds to me like a sure overturn on appeal.
Mr.Stone’s treatment at the hands of the witch judge should be a lesson to all of those hot heads that constantly post that they want to see indictments and trials now...immediately.
I am of the opinion that President Trump and Attorney General Barr are figuring out how to try the criminals in courts that are not contaminated by the evil swamp.
Some of the “hot heads” not really hot heads, but are dim trolls or never Trumpers.
Barr is brilliant and he will not let never trumpers, trolls and hot heads push him into premature action.
We are witnessing a revolution on the courts. When the dust settles, there will be fair and honest trials.
Appeal
Just another way to say, “He’s a Republican and we are here to burn him”.
Of course not..in the minds of commies, ANYONE that helped elect Donald Trump should be punished by death
Leni
Can any former Jury member prompt a retrial if they later make certain kinds of remarks? I didn’t realize their after trial remarks could justify a complaint by the plaintiff.
I’m not sure if I worded my question correctly.
As you can see, I have not passed The Bar.
The evidence in this case was substantial and almost entirely uncontested. Stone’s testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in September 2017 was a matter of record; both the prosecution and defense agreed on the facts. The real dispute was whether Stone had lied under oath and whether that mattered. The defense offered by Stone’s attorney can be summed up in to two words: So what?
First, there's no comparison of Stone's House testimony to the other, apparently contradictory, testimony relied on by the Government. Then there's the cavalier summation of Stone's attorney's argument as no more than "So what?" Seems he ought to have said what the "so, what" was and why it was wrong. After all, the prosecution had to prove that Stone's testimony was false and intentionally false. There's no indication that this jury even considered the vital issue of intent.
Good afternoon boys and girls.
Can you say mistrial?
I knew you could.
m i s t i a l
The defense lawyers will use this as grounds for an appeal.
You can bet you booties that everyone on the jury was a Dem. Are there any Republicans in DC.
Mistrial?
Tony Podesta skated because they believed Obama lawyer Greg Craig (acquitted)
DC trial juries, like the DC grand Jury, reflects the demographics of the DC citizens. They are 97% democrat, and devoid of any white male Republicans.
This gives the democrats a real weapon.
This guy should be liable for Stones costs to retry the case. He admitted that Stone didn’t get a fair hearing because of him.