Posted on 11/13/2019 7:34:53 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Stephen Miller is one of President Trump's most effective and loyal White House advisors.
He's competent, and he gets a lot done on the immigration front, an area that's unusually difficult to navigate politically, with Democrats dead set against any borders or rule of law, a leftist establishment that continuously uses the courts to render rule of law at the border meaningless, and a public susceptible to the media's migrant sob stories as their argument for ending any border laws. Even the clergy piles on in favor of the lawbreaking.
Now that Trump is poised for what appears to be a victory for rule of law in the Supreme Court on the matter of ending DACA, the long knives are coming out for Miller. They've been out before, they're really out now.
It's little more than a disguised smear campaign, and you can tell by the timing.
A fired and disgruntled Breitbart reporter named Katie McHugh, has apparently leaked emails she got from Miller to the Southern Poverty Law Center's "Hatewatch" site and now a big bid to paint Miller as a "white supremacist" is in the works.
Apparently, Miller forwarded some dodgy websites (the content of which is unknown, it could have easily been a mainstream press item or some link to American Thinker for instance) and gave his opinion to the reporters about what he'd like to see in print. This happened several years ago. But now it's crawling out of the woodwork now with such timing. Hit job? You decide.
Obama administration spinmeister Ben Rhodes has already been caught in the act of trying to orchestrate a hit on Miller earlier.
Yet assuming that's true, it's hardly a firing offense. It may not be lovely, but Miller was hardly doing something that leftists don't ordinarily do themselves.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Now is complaining that a whole lot of people from the White House had the nerve to get involved with Ukraine.
What the Kenyan from Indonesia said was that he did not have the authority to change immigration laws on his own.
And then he did it anyway.
But then again, the Constitution says he can’t be President.
Oops wrong thread.
This is the same Supreme Court that sided with President Trump on the “Muslim ban” immigration case.
They will essentially rule that Obama’s memos cannot be repealed, ever.
They would have to stand the entire system of government on it’s head. They would have to rule that an unconstitutional MEMO by Obama cannot be repealed by an EO by Trump. In essence saying that Obama created a law through an unconstitutional method but they are okay with that.
“Now that Trump is poised for what appears to be a victory for rule of law in the Supreme Court on the matter of ending DACA,”
I wouldn’t rush to count those chickens yet.
This seems so obvious to me that, if it doesn’t go 9-0 then something is really wrong here.
But the Rule Of Memo will be quite alive.
All hail President Janet Napolitano!
Why not, the Constitution was shredded on Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009 and hardly anybody noticed.
Yep.
One can never have too much coffee. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.