Posted on 10/17/2019 11:39:25 AM PDT by Jim Noble
It is considered Nixon's war because the socialists wrote the history, weren't going to take any of the blame at all...that is what they do. They started that ball early on and it was repeated over and over and their big win was it was written into school text books that way.
Never apologize! It’s a sign of weakness!
Nathan Brittles, Captain United States Cavalry.
I agree completely- The current cold civil war in progress now will become a hot CWII.
“The peaceful transfer of power was gone by 1960.”
Bingo.
It is coincident with the link-up of the Democrats and the Communist Party.
Nice car!
re: “I think “they” tried to get Reagan both ways.”
OH YOU conspiracy theorists - always good for a laugh!!
Thank you. When I wear my tinfoil hat while driving it, I really be stylin’.
Almost had a Communist in the White House in 1945
Wasn’t that in a Billy Joel song:
“What’s the matter with the car I’m driving?
Can’t you tell that it’s out of style?
Should I get a set of tin foil tires?”
Who? Wallace?
Bump
I’m pretty sure JFK wasn’t killed by “them”, though they most certainly were responsible for Nixon and their attempts at taking out Trump.
Let’s not forget that the declassified documents indicated that Johnson wasn’t even AWARE of Oswald’s involvement in the JFK assassination until about three days after it occurred, and as far as the CIA, openly assassinating JFK in broad daylight in front of potential witnesses is not exactly their style. Ion Mihai Pacepa is pretty certain that if anyone assassinated JFK, it was the Soviets and/or the Cubans, giving pretty convincing reasons to think that (for one thing, isn’t it a tad bit suspicious that they’d start a disinformation campaign pinning the blame on the usual suspects of conservatives, CIA men, Johnson, and all of that mere hours after the assassination? Not to mention said disinformation campaign being personally funded by the Central Communist Party?). In fact, all those conspiracy theories about JFK? They were brainstormed by the KGB and had their agents write them all up.
Plus, why would the globalists want JFK out? Last I checked, he was a big supporter of the United Nations, which meant he was on the globalists side. If he were fully anti-globalist, he’d advocate for the UN to be shut down completely, not say it’s the only alternative to war.
Actually, I’d probably argue that the deep state’s earliest attempt at taking out a president was in fact with Lyndon B. Johnson. Let’s not forget, he decided against running for reelection, and indicated that part of the reason why he didn’t was because of Cronkite’s infamous Tet broadcast.
Eh, I’m not too sure about that. Ignoring the recently declassified CIA memos from the assassination pointing to Johnson not even knew about LHO until three days afterwards, there’s also the fact that Ion Mihai Pacepa gave quite a bit of convincing evidence that it was the Soviets and/or the Cubans who orchestrated JFK’s assassination.
Besides, trying to openly assassinate a sitting president doesn’t exactly come across as typical of the CIA, being more the types to force a resignation (not to mention they didn’t try to assassinate Eisenhower earlier, and they certainly didn’t try to kill Johnson, Nixon, or any of those guys.). And from what I gather, Eisenhower may not have been too fond of the CIA either.
“Dragged out”? Nixon actually WON that conflict:
I think you may have mixed Nixon up with Johnson, who actually DID drag out Vietnam to no good effect for years (largely because he feared a repeat of what happened during the Korean War when the Chinese got involved).
You’re assuming the Deep State has not changed their objectives in nearly 60 years.
I am certainly not convinced that JFK was a CIA hit, but I am also no longer willing to dismiss the possibility. The FBI and CIA are far too comfortable overthrowing our own government for this to be their first rodeo. It’s time for reasonable people to look (skeptically in both directions) at the evidence that has been made public on JFK. This is, perhaps, an opportunity to understand the “sources and methods” that are clearly in play.
No I am not. Nixon was despised for dragging it out.
All I can tell you is that Stasi spymaster Markus Wolfe and Eastern European defector and former DIE agent spymaster Ion Mihai Pacepa certainly were sure that the Communists were responsible for JFK’s assassination, and the latter apparently played a big role in the disinformation campaign trying to frame conservatives and likeminded groups as being responsible. The only other time I can think of them doing something like that to a large scale was with Katyn.
As far as the Deep State, I’m definitely sure their objectives are the same as 60 years prior. Let’s not forget that the Deep State are above all else globalists. I’m extremely doubtful they’d have JFK assassinated especially considering the deep state most likely wanted the UN in place.
Not according to that Prager University video I linked. He never dragged it out. Actually, if anything, he was responsible for it being a decisive victory (or what would have been a decisive victory... had the anti-war left not exploited Watergate to get a supermajority and cut off any and all funding to the South Vietnamese). Johnson was the one who made it into a pointless quagmire due to being fearful of incurring Chinese and/or Soviet responses that might escalate into a nuclear war.
Lay off the crack.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.