Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pfizer 'deliberately buried' data showing its arthritis drug might also prevent Alzheimer's (trunc)
daily mail ^ | 6/5/2019 | SAM BLANCHARD SENIOR HEALTH REPORTER FOR MAILONLINE

Posted on 06/05/2019 10:33:08 AM PDT by RummyChick

One of the world's biggest drug firms deliberately buried data showing one of its arthritis medications could slash the risk of Alzheimer's.

Pfizer kept its finding under wraps for more than three years because, it claims, it didn't believe the evidence was strong enough.

It found the link between Alzheimer's and the drug Enbrel when analysing medical insurance claims in hundreds of thousands of people in the US.

People taking Enbrel, an anti-inflammatory used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, appeared to be 64 per cent less likely to develop the memory-robbing disorder.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alzheimers; drug; pfizer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
THis story doesn't make sense to me.
1 posted on 06/05/2019 10:33:08 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Yes
Why would a drug company hide a poten market


2 posted on 06/05/2019 10:35:36 AM PDT by Rocko Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Agreed - they would have another Viagra (which was originally for heart conditions) on their hands if this is true. I suspect that they might be investigating this but it’s under the correlation is not causation category.


3 posted on 06/05/2019 10:37:05 AM PDT by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
"THis story doesn't make sense to me."

Exactly. There's more going on here.

If they could get the drug labeled for use in treating Alzheimer's (in addition to RA), their sales would increase. Why would a drug company hold back on that is that was the only issue in play?

4 posted on 06/05/2019 10:37:31 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocko Jack

The patent running out must have been a crucial factor in this.


5 posted on 06/05/2019 10:37:39 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

is if that was the only issue
6 posted on 06/05/2019 10:38:31 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I think I agree with Pfizer here.

Any company would jump at a chance to make billions off of a working Alzheimer’s drug.

There’ve been several widely publicized drugs that hit the market for testing that promptly failed (and hurt the company financially in the process) that Pfizer taking a conservative approach may have been prudent.


7 posted on 06/05/2019 10:38:34 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocko Jack

Drug companies are not interested in prevention, that’s why. Do they have another drug under development or on the shelves for Alzheimers?


8 posted on 06/05/2019 10:39:20 AM PDT by Veto! (Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Note the date...

!UW.yye1fxo
>>> 7 Feb 2018 - 10:06:12 PM <<<
What if cures already exist?
What about the billions (public/private/govt) provided to fund cure dev?


9 posted on 06/05/2019 10:39:45 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (No dolphins were harmed in the making of this post. They enjoyed the rough handling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

It is very simple.

If they would have said anything, the FDA would have forbidden them to make such claims.


10 posted on 06/05/2019 10:40:01 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Just looked at the cost of Enbrel. WOW. not sure how long that $5,000 dose lasts


11 posted on 06/05/2019 10:40:28 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Remember, the media love salacious headlines - EVIL DRUG COMPANY DOES XXX

The US FDA would come down on Pfizer ike a ton of bricks if they claimed their drug treated an “unrelated” disease. Liability potential would be outrageous also. They certainly would NOT be allowed to market the drug for Alzheimers unless years of studies were conducted.


12 posted on 06/05/2019 10:40:47 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

I don’t like taking drugs and try to stay off them. But I might rethink it it since I could probably qualify due to a psoriasis patch on my leg.


13 posted on 06/05/2019 10:42:22 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Probably just an indicator that they are working with the government to contaminate the water supply with inflammatories thereby causing Alzheimer’s in selected populations. Apparently dumbing down the education system is not doing enough for the central planners’ taste.


14 posted on 06/05/2019 10:42:34 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocko Jack
"Why would a drug company hide a poten market"

Possibilities


15 posted on 06/05/2019 10:43:03 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

More likely there was some indication but test trials would have been so expensive they wouldn’t recover the cost.
At Intel, we abandoned many designs as analysis said little return on investment.

We had several designs in the works which were trending so badly, we just said “no more”


16 posted on 06/05/2019 10:43:22 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Even if the patent was going to run out on Embrel itself, the trials could have resulted in a slightly modified, re-purposed drug for which a new patent would apply.

Doing absolutely nothing until the patent for Embrel ran out means they've given up whatever advantage they would have had to develop a new drug first.

Doesn't make sense.

17 posted on 06/05/2019 10:43:32 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Not the issue. This is not about them making the claim to market the item.

This is about doing clinical trials.


18 posted on 06/05/2019 10:43:39 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
They don't dare make such a claim without good data.

19 posted on 06/05/2019 10:46:21 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

I think the patent ran out before the trials would be over. 2015. 4 years. Patent ran out in 2018.


20 posted on 06/05/2019 10:47:15 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson