Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nate Silver: 85% chance Dems win the House
Five Thirty Eight ^ | 10/23/2018 | Nate Silver

Posted on 10/29/2018 3:14:03 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative

in 7 Chance Democrats win control (86.4%) 1 in 7 Chance Republicans keep

(Excerpt) Read more at fivethirtyeight.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2018midterms; 538; bluewave; election; midterms; natesilver; postedseveraltimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: St. Louis Conservative

And dont forget Hillary has a 95% chance of winning too lil Natie.


41 posted on 10/29/2018 4:25:36 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberal is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; LS

IDTS
Nate is worse than a coin toss.
And there were pollsters who said POTUS would win. Just not Nate. Check out our own Larry Schweikart, Joel Pollak, the USC/LA Times tracking poll and the Investor’s Business Daily/TIPP tracking poll.

Here are a couple others: https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2016/11/10/here-are-3-people-who-correctly-predicted-donald-trump-would-win-the-election


42 posted on 10/29/2018 4:27:50 PM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

The problem with 538 is they use polling to base their “reasoning”.. but they don’t bother to throw away stupid polls... same thing with RCP... every so often in 16 and here in 18, some poll so far out of the norm shows up.. showing a D up 10 or 15 where there is no way in hell its right, but they use in their RCP averages.. and Nate uses them too.,

These big stupid polls aren’t accidents, they are intentional, and show up to throw off the rolling averages etc.

18 polls are off just like 16 were.. and largely for the same reason... what the pollsters consider “likely” voters. If you haven’t voted recently, you are filtered out as UNLIKELY... Well guess what? Trump was attracting those disenfranchised and “unlikely” voters in huge numbers... and the pollsters were filtering them out.

18 is going to have the same problem... Kavanaugh angered the casual middle... they aren’t regular voters, largely may be apolitical, and certainly may not be hugely fond of the GOP.. but you better believe they are going to show up to punish the Dems for their actions...

Up until Kavanaugh, the Dems were sitting on an easy take of the house, due to an apathetic right and middle.. post Kavanaugh? No chance in hell... Obviously next tuesday night we know for certain... but there is one thing you can’t do in US politics and that’s anger the middle.... And the Dems angered the middle in a way they haven’t been in a LONG LONG TIME.. and don’t seem to realize what they have done..


43 posted on 10/29/2018 4:27:52 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

I think he’s raising the percentage, then betting against himself.


44 posted on 10/29/2018 4:29:07 PM PDT by Garvin (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

92% Hillary to 8% Trump chances.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Whatever happened to that fellow Mr.Trump (the skyscraper builder guy, you know.) I didn’t follow the results but he obviously lost.
Does President Hillary Clinton even remember him now? Like we forgot Mondale, Dukakis or James Stockdale who ran for V.P. with H. Ross Perot.

Boy, those pollsters have it all down to a science thanks to modern computers.

I sent in my absentee ballot for straight GOP here but this means I guess it was a waste of stamps.


45 posted on 10/29/2018 4:38:36 PM PDT by frank ballenger ("End vote fruntiaud,noncitizens & illegals voting & leftist media news censorship or we're finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ohiobushman

Nate Silver... a dreaming, steaming, TURD.


46 posted on 10/29/2018 4:55:48 PM PDT by wetgundog (CNN is FAKE NEWS ...Just added NBC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

It was also said the same about this year’s Red Soxs until late last night.


47 posted on 10/29/2018 4:57:49 PM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

So this means the pubbies are pretty much a lock to win the House and Senate.


48 posted on 10/29/2018 5:00:03 PM PDT by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
And the Dems angered the middle in a way they haven’t been in a LONG LONG TIME.. and don’t seem to realize what they have done..

"I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve." - Admiral Isoroku Yamaomoto

49 posted on 10/29/2018 5:27:59 PM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

This is the last gasp. They will be cheating with the voting more than ever. There is a chance they have enough people in place to pull it off. We must vote!!!


50 posted on 10/29/2018 5:31:10 PM PDT by bigtoona (Make America Great Again! America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

He is an idiot. He said that Hillary had an 80% chance to win. And he said that Trump would win the popular vote and Hillary the electoral college.


51 posted on 10/29/2018 6:05:04 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

RCP already hat the GOP picking up 3 Senate seats. No one thought the Democrats would win the Senate.


52 posted on 10/29/2018 6:06:40 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Nate’s in for another Red Awakening!


53 posted on 10/29/2018 6:14:41 PM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Nate declared Trump would lose SEVEN times. He’s a joke.


54 posted on 10/29/2018 7:11:33 PM PDT by HonkyTonkMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

The Republicans lose the House, we are disappointed but we soldier on.

The Democrats don’t win the House, they are beyond redemption and bordering on suicide.


55 posted on 10/29/2018 7:25:09 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

The ONLY way LIEberal Demonrats win on November 6 is if Real Americans don’t vote!

JOBS NOT MOBS!

VOTE REPUBLICAN!


56 posted on 10/29/2018 7:38:21 PM PDT by Taxman (We will never be a truly free people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative; LS; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; StoneWall Brigade; randita; ...

I put them at only 45% to steal the House. My most pessimistic forecast doesn’t see them talking more than a narrow majority, I can’t see them reaching 230 under any circumstances.

If he really thinks McCrapskul is the favorite (she’s trailed, narrowly but consistently from the jump) and Donnelly is 2-1 than he’s forking nuts.


57 posted on 10/30/2018 7:21:33 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Rather than %, where do you see 24 flips? (I’m not going with 25 in case Paulsen in MN offsets the other flip we’re getting there).

I can’t get past 15, even giving Ds the benefit of the doubt.


58 posted on 10/30/2018 7:23:28 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Nate Silver is trash without access to internal polling from Obama.


59 posted on 10/30/2018 7:24:14 AM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HonkyTonkMan

Strangely, we took the polling data for Marist, and they actually do good actual polling. We just “normalized” it for accurate sampling. The way oversampled D’s. Turns out that if you did it correctly, we got closer than any polling outfit. Were only off by .1 in 3 states.

It’s not the data. It’s the interpretation.


60 posted on 10/30/2018 10:02:42 AM PDT by spacewarp (FreeRepublic, Rush's show prep since foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson