Here’s the simplest global model changers rely on.
When the weather is _________ than average, it is proof of man made climate change. When the _________ ice sheet is __________, it is consistent with models and proof showing climate change.
A climate model is a made up POS to advance the agenda of the ahole who made it up!!!
I've been saying this for years, and people REFUSE To believe me: Climate models cannot predict the formation and behavior of CLOUDS! Without that ability, they are pretty much useless for long-term prediction of response to forcings like CO2.
Climate Models................. I've been saying this for years, and people REFUSE To believe me: Climate models cannot predict the formation and behavior of CLOUDS! Without that ability, they are pretty much useless for long-term prediction of response to forcings like CO2.
The obviuous question here is who paid for this "programme"?
Did the people who paid for this "programme" have a specific result when they purchased it?
Was the result designed to increase their own power, profit and prestige?
Finally, have any of these models actually predicted anything accurately other than if its cold its AGW, if its hot its AGW, too much rain obviously AGW, too little rain proof of AGW. AGW as far as the eye can see!
So what would be happening w/o AGW? Sunshine, rainbows, popcicles, soft kitties and marmalade.
Anything you want it to be - $$$$$$
They can’t tell me the weather 2 days from now, but their “model” from 5,000 years ago, tells me it was cooler. OK.
Oh good gravy. Who cares how small a box one uses? Precision is not relevent in processes that are inncacurate. If you use the wrong formula to calculate something it doesnt matter how many decimal places you calculate it to.
The article needed some editing.
Technology Review is yet another outlet for the liberal propagandists. It still manages to cover some interesting tech, but many articles have had a leftwing at least as far back as 2008.
In 2008, TR put Barack Obama on their cover in an obvious attempt to influence the election in his favor. As if BO had the remotest link to technology, to say nothing of being worthy of a cover.
Pathetic.
Science requires use of the scientific method, which entails the conduct of controlled experiments yielding reproducible results.
It is impossible to conduct controlled experiments on climate, much less obtain reproducible results.
There can therefore be no such thing as “climate science.”
“Garbage in, garbage out” applies.
They’re lucky if they can predict a hurricane’s landfall location 100 hours out, much less 100 years.
If by "occasionally" failing to predict real climate they mean "always" failing to predict real climate then yeah, that's what the models do.
Climate models should be open source, complete with instructions on how to replicate results.
