Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(vanity) Is Obama the Redacted Name as a Receiver of Classified Emails from Hillary Clinton?
VANITY

Posted on 11/01/2016 8:34:27 PM PDT by TigerClaws

This is the key info from the FBI Vault HRC leak:

**

Because of Executive Privilege, Obama's name would be redacted from these files.

We also know that (per Wiki) Obama did receive HRC state.gov emails.

This would implicate POTUS in the criminality and explain why HRC wasn't put before a Grand Jury. The entire hierarchy of the Executive Branch would be indicted.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: anotherstupidvanity; chat; istherealink; vanity

1 posted on 11/01/2016 8:34:27 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Dunno but I’m guessing that iii, jjj, and kkk all refer to footnotes.


2 posted on 11/01/2016 8:36:50 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statemeHalloween party?nt of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Which also means the Mr Herring of the FBI lied to Rep Chavetz when he told him there was no ‘executive privilege’ in any of the redactions.


3 posted on 11/01/2016 8:38:33 PM PDT by JPJones (George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Steve Pieczenik said that they were going to prosecute Obama.


4 posted on 11/01/2016 8:38:54 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3487966/posts?page=122#122 for a transcript of Pieczenik’s comments. He said they were going to “convict and indict the President of the United States.”


5 posted on 11/01/2016 8:40:36 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Redacted from the FBI, but that would be de- redacted when it comes from Julian A.


6 posted on 11/01/2016 8:45:42 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

In a criminal investigation, there should be no redactions. People (a varied panel to avoid partisanship) with the proper security clearances should review every word of classified emails and report the nature of the communications.


7 posted on 11/01/2016 8:45:56 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Wow. You sure like cluttering up "News" with your "stuff", don't you?

Show some class

8 posted on 11/01/2016 8:46:19 PM PDT by LouAvul (The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Then indict their asses!! You break the law, you suffer the penalty. Is that not how it works?


9 posted on 11/01/2016 8:46:22 PM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul; TigerClaws

Where the heck did that come from? This was posted as a vanity, not as “news”. It raises a serious question about a critical issue to the election.

What’s your problem?


10 posted on 11/01/2016 8:51:38 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

well the name Obama looks like it would fit in the redacted box....or POTUS


11 posted on 11/01/2016 9:17:07 PM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Bkmrk.


12 posted on 11/02/2016 12:35:39 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (<<<<< he no longer IS my 'teddy bear'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

From what I’ve read. HRottenC never activated her state.gov account. If she did send email to Barky (at least 22×) then it was from her clintonemail.com acct. Why did not he did not notice?


13 posted on 11/02/2016 5:59:34 AM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

-—convict and indict-—

I thought this wording was peculiar and raised my normal skepticism. The wording seems very unprofessional from an alleged professional.

A correct phrase would be “indict and convict”. Lacking an indictment first, there can be no conviction.


14 posted on 11/02/2016 6:04:00 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Hilary is an Ameriphobe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

How do you do a “Vanity” post?


15 posted on 11/03/2016 11:06:15 AM PDT by ZULU (We are freedom's safest place!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Someone emailed me that the site manager (Jim) asked they not be posted on the News/Page.

But when you do a post you have to select TOPICS. At the very end is VANITY. Select that. Then identify it as a VANITY post in the title.

They occasionally ax them. If you don’t click it as NEWS/CURRENT events it’ll be more likely to remain up.


16 posted on 11/03/2016 11:11:35 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Thank you!


17 posted on 11/03/2016 11:25:15 AM PDT by ZULU (We are freedom's safest place!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson