|
Click The Pic To Donate  |
Posted on 05/30/2016 5:11:08 PM PDT by Rockitz
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A writer for The Huffington Post is still waiting for an explanation as to why editors deleted his piece reporting that the FBI will pursue an indictment against Hillary Clinton. Huffington Post freelance contributor Frank Huguenard, a scientist and public speaker, wrote a report for the liberal site Sunday entitled “Hillary Clinton to be Indicted On Federal Racketeering Charges.” But the piece was not up for long before the Huffington Post pulled it down and replaced it with a “404” Error screen.
“Huffpo has yet to respond to my request for an explanation,” Huguenard tweeted at this Breitbart News reporter Monday morning. “I’ve got my sources, they never asked.”
Huguenard later told Breitbart News, “I want to do another story but my HuffPo account has been temporarily disabled. Not sure what’s happening with them.”
Huffington Post Politics senior editor Sam Stein told Breitbart News that he doesn’t know why the piece was pulled.
...
Huguenard, an apparent Bernie Sanders supporter judging by his Twitter account, wrote that the FBI will recommend indicting Hillary Clinton on racketeering charges. Huguenard wrote:
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime. RICO allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
...
James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
All in for Bernie. Pink slip arrives tomorrow.
No justice no peace.
Pray America wakes
Untoward
because thier on the clintoon crazy train
|
Click The Pic To Donate |
LOL, The old HTTP 404 error. I’ll wait for the web developer to fix it soon.
Editors deleted my article.
Hmmm, sounds like a number VIII.
I
Thou shall create an illusion of invulnerability shared by most members to foster excessive optimism and encourage extreme risks taking
II
Thou shall not allow any member to question the group’s inherent morality; instead members shall be encouraged to ignore the ethical or moral consequences of their decisions
III
Thou shall promote collective efforts to rationalize in order to discount warnings, or other information that might lead members to reconsider their assumptions before they recommit themselves to their assumptions
IV
Thou shall reinforce stereotyped views of enemy leaders as too evil to warrant genuine attempts to negotiate, or as too weak and stupid to counter whatever risky attempts are made to defeat their purpose
V
Thou shall self-censor any deviation from the apparent group consensus, inclining each member to minimize the importance of their doubts and counterarguments
VI
Thou shall create and maintain a shared illusion of unanimity concerning judgment conforming to the majority view
VII
Thou shall apply direct pressure on any member who expresses strong arguments against any of the group’s stereotypes, illusions, or commitments, making clear that this type of dissent is contrary to what is expected of all loyal members
VIII
Thou shall appoint mind guards to protect the group from adverse information that might shatter their shared complacency about the effectiveness and morality of their decisions
Eddie01 (adapted from Irving Janis ‘82)
The senior editor of the Huffington Post has no idea why the piece was pulled???
He’s only one of the key people who decide what the heck goes up on their site in the first place. So of course he is clueless as to what goes on the site he’s responsible for......
Does this fail to pass the smell test to anyone else????
This could well be true. NO ONE has mentioned RICO before. Fascinating.
Pretty damning.
The Clintons are like slippery eels - they know how to get out of it.
I’d like to see both of them behind bars doing hard time but I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for it to happen.
Bill beat perjury. What can’t Hillary beat?
Oh, how I’d love to see all three Clintons in handcuffs.
The article is posted here....at least for now...
http://k1nsey6.com/2016/05/hillary-clinton-to-be-indicted-on-federal-racketeering-charges/
It’s a little like Chris Stevens dying of smoke inhalation-in a bathroom that showed it was lathered with blood up to 4+ feet.
Maybe the “Berners” know it will get more attention if it’s removed from the website. And the Huffies are all Berners.
EXCERPT:
Here’s what we do know. Tens of millions of dollars donated to the Clinton Foundation was funneled to the organization through a Canadian shell company which has made tracing the donors nearly impossible. Less than 10% of donations to the Foundation has actually been released to charitable organizations and $2M that has been traced back to long time Bill Clinton friend Julie McMahon (aka The Energizer). When the official investigation into Hillary’s email server began, she instructed her IT professional to delete over 30,000 emails and cloud backups of her emails older than 30 days at both Platte River Networks and Datto, Inc. The FBI has subsequently recovered the majority, if not all, of Hillary’s deleted emails and are putting together a strong case against her for attempting to cover up her illegal and illicit activities.
A conviction under RICO comes when the Department of Justice proves that the defendant has engaged in two or more examples of racketeering and that the defendant maintained an interest in, participated in or invested in a criminal enterprise affecting interstate or foreign commerce. There is ample evidence already in the public record that the Clinton Foundation qualifies as a criminal enterprise and there’s no doubt that the FBI is privy to significantly more evidence than has already been made public.
PING
FYI
See post 11.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.