Posted on 05/30/2016 5:11:08 PM PDT by Rockitz
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A writer for The Huffington Post is still waiting for an explanation as to why editors deleted his piece reporting that the FBI will pursue an indictment against Hillary Clinton. Huffington Post freelance contributor Frank Huguenard, a scientist and public speaker, wrote a report for the liberal site Sunday entitled “Hillary Clinton to be Indicted On Federal Racketeering Charges.” But the piece was not up for long before the Huffington Post pulled it down and replaced it with a “404” Error screen.
“Huffpo has yet to respond to my request for an explanation,” Huguenard tweeted at this Breitbart News reporter Monday morning. “I’ve got my sources, they never asked.”
Huguenard later told Breitbart News, “I want to do another story but my HuffPo account has been temporarily disabled. Not sure what’s happening with them.”
Huffington Post Politics senior editor Sam Stein told Breitbart News that he doesn’t know why the piece was pulled.
...
Huguenard, an apparent Bernie Sanders supporter judging by his Twitter account, wrote that the FBI will recommend indicting Hillary Clinton on racketeering charges. Huguenard wrote:
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime. RICO allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
...
James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Anything that Hapless Larry Klayman handles ends up HELPING the Clintons!
Yes, and it called CLUSH.com ;)
Here’s one place: https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/benghazi-bathroom.png?w=640&h=348
Don’t fall for this. The Clintons will never be indicted for anything. We are being gullible to believe this guy’s opinion means anything but wishful thinking.
“Even the Democratic Party could be criminally complicit.”
Every demonrat of any influence is a serial felon.
Thanks to Trump, we now know that our entire political class is irredeemably corrupt.
Actually, Bill did NOT beat “perjury”. He was censured by the ABA and lost his license to practice law in the US.
What he did “beat” was a ^Bill of Impeachment^ in the Senate, drawn against the charge of “suborning perjury”:
AKA, pressuring others to lie to congress regarding his activities as presented by Starr.
His legal team was deftly able to turn the willing [D] Senate’s attention to, “It’s just sex.” making the charge a direct attack on BJ as a person and not as a public servant.
The point here is that the entire Washington DC political-class are very accepting of recreational sex and an impeachment would have slowed down their access to nooky, regardless of which team they batted for.
Everyone else who is anyone else.
Don’t pass Cletus’ meager IT-nose.
:: Trump DOJ indicts her and she is convicted ::
There are several problems with that.
(1) If done too early in the T admin, the cry will point to “gloating”.
(2) Again, if done too early, T will be accused of ^war on wymyn^ issues.
(3) T will be accused of inserting an US-AG simply to attack Hillary ans thereby making any indictment as ‘fait accompli’.
I prefer the 3-Stooges approach to any mention of Niagra Falls...iffin you get my drift.
:: You, sir, have been screwed by the Huffpo folks ::
Sometimes a conservative is created from the violent mugging of socialist.
It seems that one of those ensnared in this scheme might be the “honorable” Gov. McAuliffe, AKA The Punk.
She used her time in the Senate and then her position in State to help a Canadian investor to gain uranium deposits in the US which eventually allowed a wholly owned Russian controlled corporation to obtain those same deposits. It’s a classic clinton shell game. She, along with slick willy, also assisted India to gain a large foothold in the nuclear arena. Clinton Cash is a good book to follow the money and the who they met with.
Yes. See post 11 and others.
For Hillary, a pardon is a disaster politically. In public perception, only serious criminals need pardons.
Full story would get out.
Nothing will ever change her support from the 30% True Belivvers, but would be very serious for undecideds
For Hillary, a pardon is a disaster politically. In public perception, only serious criminals need pardons.
Full story would get out.
Nothing will ever change her support from the 30% True Belivvers, but would be very serious for undecideds
Whoda tought? ??? :)
So the huff po is 100% in the tank for hillary. Big surprise.
LOL! Could add Refurbished E-mail Servers.
I’m beginning to wonder if the clintons aren’t allowing things to move forward so that in case they are charged they at least have the opportunity to get pardoned before obama gets out of office. It’s a very fine timing - election win/lose, charges, pardon opportunity - hoping they don’t manage to thread the needle or that the fbi holds some recommended charges back for after obama is out and can’t pardon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
