Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Review, conservative thinkers stand against Trump
CNN ^ | 1/21/16 | Dylan Byers

Posted on 01/21/2016 4:17:03 PM PST by jimbo123

National Review, the conservative magazine founded by William F. Buckley, will publish a special issue on Friday opposing Donald Trump's bid for the presidency, according to a source with knowledge of the issue's contents.

The issue will feature a blistering editorial that labels Trump a threat to conservatism, as well as essays by 22 prominent conservative thinkers from various ideological factions, in opposition to Trump's candidacy, the source said.

"Donald Trump is a menace to American conservatism who would take the work of generations and trample it underfoot on behalf of a populism as heedless and crude as The Donald himself," the editorial states.

The issue, first reported by Jonathan Martin of The New York Times, comes as conservative pundits and GOP leaders debate which of the two leading Republican candidates -- Trump and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz -- poses the greater threat to the party.

Rich Lowry, the editor of National Review, spent weeks reaching out to fellow conservatives, ranging from The Weekly Standard's William Kristol to RedState's Erick Erickson, to commission essays for the issue.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; againsttrump; antitrump; clintonnonnews; cnn; cnsrvtvtreehouse; demagogicparty; dylanbyers; erickerickson; glennbeck; jonathanmartin; marklevin; megynkelly; memebuilding; nationalreview; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; pinkstain; pinkstate; politico; redstate; redstategathering; rogerailes; sundance; trump; williamkristol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-214 next last
To: Randall_S
Is this the same gaggle of morons who ruined Buckley's magazine and gave us Romney and McCain?

Buckley was pretty disillusioned politically in his later years. The magazine might not be so different if he were still around today. His son wouldn't have dared endorse Obama, though, if WFB were still alive.

81 posted on 01/21/2016 4:44:04 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

Yeah, didn’t realize it was fake and am being flamed.. But its all ok. :-)


Let me explain WHY being fooled by that tweet was bad. It has nothing to do with understanding twitter either. But, it does show that you have paid no attention to what Trump has been saying, not just at these rallies, but for years. He has said he gave close to 30k to McCain to run for Pres, and supported Romney, decided that he had to do it himself.

Cruz is my Senator, and I like him, but like Trump better. If I had seen a tweet that said it was from Cruz stating that he was for Obama, I wouldn’t believe it. I would do research.

I think you need to go watch a few Trump rallies, and read the fun comments on the rally threads. Trust me, the Cruz side is bitter and depressing, sometimes nasty. Find out what Trump is saying before falling for the lies.


82 posted on 01/21/2016 4:44:10 PM PST by magglepuss (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

It’s a fake that’s already been debunked. Glenn Beck is the one who originally published the fake and had to apologize a day later.


83 posted on 01/21/2016 4:45:05 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

You’re the one who’s late to the party....posting fake Glenn Beck type carp.

Did you ask the mods to have it pulled, to save you further embarrassment?


84 posted on 01/21/2016 4:46:18 PM PST by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

I just saw your post about not knowing it was a fake, so I want to apologize too for insinuating that you were knowingly posting a lie instead simply not knowing it was a fake.


85 posted on 01/21/2016 4:46:36 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Trump a threat to conservatism.

Has this magazine ever printed that all those rinos like McCain and Romney and Boner and Ryan are a threat to conservatism? The republican party left conservatism long ago. If the people at this magazine can’t see that then they’re a bunch of idiots.


86 posted on 01/21/2016 4:47:05 PM PST by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Yeah I did. The reason I didn’t know it was fake is cuz I avoid threads with Glen Beck’s name in the title....lol


87 posted on 01/21/2016 4:47:27 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

You should ask the mods to delete it. If you didn’t know it was fake, that’s what you’d do.


88 posted on 01/21/2016 4:48:32 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

I did.


89 posted on 01/21/2016 4:49:02 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

The scum bags from “conservative incorporated” speak through NR which is an establishment organ same as the WSJ & sames as the Weakly Standard....ought to tell you who they fear.


90 posted on 01/21/2016 4:49:06 PM PST by LongWayHome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

Didn’t Dole endorse 41 over Reagan?


91 posted on 01/21/2016 4:49:15 PM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

All good. :-)


92 posted on 01/21/2016 4:51:12 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Mark Steyn yesterday I think, pointed out that the mere word ‘bipartisanship’ MEANS Uniparty. And the more bipartisanship you’ve got, the more Uniparty you’ve got. It’s bad. Really bad. But they say it like it’s good.


93 posted on 01/21/2016 4:51:19 PM PST by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
National Review, conservative thinkers stand against Trump

If only National Review had been even half as effective in championing and publicizing the concerns American citizens have over illegal immigration over it's publishing history as Trump has been in the last 6 months.

Watch Trump and learn, NR and establishment Republicans.
94 posted on 01/21/2016 4:51:27 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123; RoosterRedux; Albion Wilde; hoosiermama; Amntn; RitaOK; flaglady47; HarleyLady27; ...
Rich Lowry, the editor of National Review, spent weeks reaching out to fellow conservatives, ranging from The Weekly Standard's William Kristol to RedState's Erick Erickson, to commission essays for the issue....

Fellow 'conservatives'....LOLOL.

Sick puppies....going after the HISTORIC GOP FRONTRUNNER who has brought in the exact voters that the GOPe has been crying about getting in to their 'big tent' (ha!), for years. Blacks, hispanics, women, blue collar workers (wait....they don't give a flip about the blue collar workers, never mind that one).

Yet, many folks, here have been crying that Trump is establishment. Wrong, again.

95 posted on 01/21/2016 4:51:58 PM PST by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

Do you have any idea how much damage you are doing to your candidate posting stuff like that.

This has been proven to be a fake. Glenn Beck apologized to Trump over it.

Now, you continue to post it on the forum.

Why?

You’re not going to get respect from one person for doing this, and if someone tells you you will, they are playing you.

Quit being used by this.


96 posted on 01/21/2016 4:51:59 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Free Republic Caucus: vote daily / watch for the thread / Starts 01/20 midnight to midnight EDST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

You should tell the mods to remove your post. They’re probably busy but it would be a nice thing to do.


97 posted on 01/21/2016 4:53:22 PM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard then Third: I like to destroy the Turks (Moslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

Don’t worry. We all make mistakes. Especially the extra rude nasties who are taking you to task over you error.

I’m sure none of them have ever passed on a hoax. /s


98 posted on 01/21/2016 4:53:31 PM PST by Seruzawa (All those memories will be lost,in time, like tears in rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

You’re late to the party. lol Didn’t realize it was fake when I posted, but about 20 freepers or more have let me know. Great people, freepers. Anyway, I have asked the mods to remove but I think they are sleeping on the job today. :-(


99 posted on 01/21/2016 4:53:35 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
He will follow Obama's lead in ignoring the Separation of Powers (he has directly said so); he could start a trend of electing personalities, celebrities, and/or hyper-wealthy folks (most of whom tend to be idiots).

I recognize that Mr. Trump can bluster at times. The best of poker players do. It keeps the competition guessing and gives him leverage. Things he has learned by being a very successful businessman.

To the second part,I understand your concern. It's who he hangs with and gets photos taken. However, when it comes to putting people in positions of authority he has established a fine track record of outstanding choices. I don't think after many decades of this pattern that he will or even can haphazardly select idiots. So that is not a concern I share about Mr. Trump.

100 posted on 01/21/2016 4:54:15 PM PST by Kudsman (Restore the Republic, repeal the 17th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson