Posted on 01/01/2016 1:41:29 PM PST by Nachum
In early December Hillary Clinton told ABC liberal hack and friend George Stephanopoulos she didnât lie when she told the Benghazi families that the attack was in response to the film.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
To bad the democrat party doesn’t have some one with a little ethics like Jerry Zeifman today. He would probably be run out of office by them today.
You missed your calling. You should have been Hillary’s speech writer. For a tale like you just posted, you should at least get an honorable mention.
I hope the first thing Trump says, is CUT ME SOME SLACK. What disgusts me, is that she still stands a good chance of being the next president. The rats don’t care if she is a lying, conniving POS, because most, if not all libtards, are also lying, conniving POSs themselves.
This is supposed to be a family forum.
She told the Benghazi committee she went to bed. Doesn’t sons like fog of war to me.
Thanks for quoting that.
If she can’t handle “fog of war” for an embassy attack of just 13 hours, how can she lead in a real war lasting years?
I’m looking forward to Trump giving her a nervous breakdown.
Hillary Says She Lied to Benghazi Families Due to â Fog of War â⦠DONALD TRUMP Responds
Check out article and # 20 .
See this is where Hitlary Clinton could learn a lot from her hubby, he knew how to look you in the eye and lie through his teeth and still keep a straight face..this Commie b*tch can’t do it
Great analysis of Benghazi. Your story sounds very plausible.
Now another thing that’s got me curious - what was the purpose of going into Libya in the first place. Why did Obama decide to take out Khaffi?
And what about the gun-running narrative — the notion that Stevens may have been helping to send weapons to Syria?
Any intelligence (or hunches) on these sides of the story? Thanks.
I knew 6 months ago that Hillary will not be the Democrat candidate. She is too ill and will not hold up well. It takes stamina to make on the election trail, and she will not be able to do so.
Since she’s told the American public her brain perceives that crises are a fog and that she fails miserably in such fogs, why would anyone want to elect her to anything affecting their lives? Since she’s admitted she can’t operate competently in a complex and/or stressful situation and that she gets confused and fogged out, why would anyone vote for her for anything? She’s a ruthless, desperate, foggy brained harpy.
THAT is the best news I’ve read all day.
Anybody but hildabeast... or the mooch.
http://www.scriptonitedaily.com/2013/08/27/us-general-wesley-clark-war-on-syria-planned-in-1991-as-part-of-middle-east-land-grab/
This is why!!!!
Evil neocon asshats.
I don’t think Trumyhas started yet. He is just warming up with the Clintons. We had seen how he had managed to dominate the best GOP field of candidates I had ever seen in my lifetime. It’s going to be Epic
If an attack on a US Embassy by a bunch of rebels is a ‘fog of war ‘ to her, what would a real full scale attack on our soil or possession be?
This woman is absolutely in over her head, as bad as the joker she wants to succeed. With a monetary greed thrown in.
The real fog we are going to have to work through is the 50 million voters who think she would be a good president.
But, I thought Trump was a liberal and a stalking horse for Hillary and was going to run third party and hand the election to Hillary? I read it here!
More like the “fog of 100 proof”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.