Posted on 12/15/2015 9:51:08 AM PST by Red Steel
[Full title] Trump Edges Cruz in Iowa; His Supporters Think Japanese Internment Was Good; Clinton Still Well Ahead of Sanders In State
PPPâs newest Iowa poll finds Donald Trump and Ted Cruz at the top of the heap with 28% and 25% respectively. Marco Rubio at 14% and Ben Carson at 10% are also in double digits with Jeb Bush at 7% the only other candidate who clears even 3%. Chris Christie, Carly Fiorina, and Mike Huckabee all hit that level with John Kasich and Rand Paul each getting 2%, Lindsey Graham and Rick Santorum each getting 1%, and Jim Gilmore and George Pataki both having literally no support.
Trump, Cruz, Rubio, and Bush have all seen varying increases in their support in the six weeks since we last polled Iowa. Cruz obviously has the most momentum, picking up 11 points from his 14% standing in early November. Trump has gained 6 points, Rubio 4 points, and Bush 2 points.
As weâve been finding across the country for the last month Carson has seen the most serious downward arc in his support, dropping 11 points from his previous 21% standing. Huckabeeâs dropped 3 points and Fiorina by 2 points as well.
There are a lot of divisions between where Cruz and Trumpâs support is coming from. Among voters whose biggest concern is having a candidate whoâs conservative on the issues Cruz leads with 33% to 26% for Trump and 15% for Carson. But with voters whose biggest concern is being able to beat a Democrat in the general election, Trump wins out with 31% to 20% each for Cruz and Rubio. Cruz leads Trump 31/30 with men, but Trump more than makes up for that with a 26/17 lead among women. Cruz has a strong advantage with âvery conservativeâ voters at 37% to 25% for Trump and 14% for Carson but Trump leads based on his strength with moderates, with whom gets 42% to 14% each for Rubio and Bush.
Itâs ironic that Trump leads with moderates, because the views of his supporters wouldnât be considered moderate by most standards:
-78% support Trumpâs call to bans Muslims from entering the United States, to only 13% who oppose it. Overall 54% of Republicans support him on that to 28% who are opposed. Supporters of Cruz (62/20) and Carson (54/25) also favor a Muslim ban while backers of Rubio (28/48) and Bush (28/49) are opposed.
-65% of Trump voters think thousands of Arabs in New Jersey cheered the collapse of the World Trade Center, to only 11% who donât think that happened. Overall 43% of Republicans think that event occurred to 29% who donât. Supporters of Carson (44/10) and Cruz (45/26) agree with Trumpâs that it happened while those of Rubio (24/47) and Bush (12/62) say it didnât.
-59% of Trump voters support a national database of Muslims, to 18% who are opposed. Republicans as a whole are evenly divided on that issue, 40/40. Carson supporters (42/38) join with Trumpâs in wanting a Muslim database but those of Cruz (38/42), Rubio (32/48), and Bush (19/62) are all against it.
-45% of Trump voters want to shut down the mosques in the United States, to only 23% who are opposed to doing that. Overall just 27% of Republicans support that to 45% who are opposed though. Supporters of all the other major GOP candidates are opposed to shutting down mosques- itâs 32/48 with Carson backers, 25/44 with those of Cruz, 9/66 with Rubio voters, and 9/69 with Bushâs.
-Finally as long as we were at it we decided weâd ask people if they thought Japanese internment had been a good idea. Among Trump voters 48% say they support the use of internment during World War II, to only 21% who say they oppose it. Overall just 29% of Republicans support that to 39% opposed, and supporters of all the other candidates are against it- 29/33 with Cruz voters, 23/54 with Rubioâs, 12/48 with Carsonâs, and 13/56 with Bushâs.
Trumpâs positions arenât hurting him for now but if he ever does falter Cruz is very well positioned to benefit. Besides his overall second place position Cruz is the most broadly popular of the candidates in Iowa, with a 68/20 favorability rating. Heâs also the most frequent second choice of Iowa voters at 19% to 12% each for Carson and Rubio, and 11% for Trump. When you combine first and second choices Cruz leads with 44% to 39% for Trump, 26% for Rubio, and 22% for Carson. Cruz is specifically by far and away the second choice of Trump voters at 36% to 14% for Carson with no one else hitting double digits. Quick notes on some other hopefuls:
-Bush has the highest negatives of any of the candidates with 47% seeing him unfavorably to only 35% who have a positive view. He continues to particularly have a credibility issue on the right- with âvery conservativeâ voters his favorability is 24/61 and just 2% of voters within that group favor him for the nomination.
-What weâre continuing to find with Rubio right now is that heâs sort of in a holding pattern. When we polled Iowa last month he was in 4th place with a 60/20 favorability rating. Now thanks to the collapse of Carson heâs in 3rd place with a nearly identical 59/22 favorability. Heâs not getting much momentum but heâs at least not falling apart either.
-Carsonâs not just losing out on people saying heâs their first choice- heâs had a general decline in his image with GOP voters. Last month he had a +61 (74/13) favorability, thatâs now dropped to +40 at 63/23. His combined first and second choice support has dropped from 40% down to 22%.
-John Kasichâs just really not making an impact. A plurality of GOP voters- 41%- donât even have an opinion about him one way or the other. Among voters who do have one itâs quite negative with only 22% seeing him favorably to 37% with a negative view.
-Mike Huckabee on the other hand is very popular with the Republican base. 64% see him favorably to just 21% with a negative view, making him the most broadly liked hopeful other than Cruz. That goodwill just isnât translating into support for the nomination for him though.
On the Democratic side Hillary Clinton continues to be the clear favorite in Iowa. Sheâs at 52% to 34% for Bernie Sanders and 7% for Martin OâMalley. Sanders leads 47/40 with younger voters, but thatâs not enough to make up for Clinton holding a 64/20 advantage with seniors. She leads by pretty similar margins of 19 points with liberals at 56/37 and 22 points with moderates at 52/30. And she also has comparable leads with both women (21 points at 55/34) and men (15 points at 49/34). Clintonâs favorability rating is 73/19 while Sandersâ comes in at 65/23.
Full results here
This isn’t about domestic tranquility, it is about WAR! There is, believe it or not, an enormous difference!
I just want to ask those that don’t want to stop Muslims from coming in until we figure this out, do you support Isis “Trojan horses” coming in and killing American Citizen like occurred in San Bernadino? If you don’t support a halt of Muslim immigration — what do you propose to insure this never happens again?
Interesting that history books say we had “Nazi concentration camps” but not Democrat Japanese-American Internment Camps.
” Many internees lost irreplaceable personal property due to restrictions that prohibited them from taking more than they could carry into the camps. These losses were compounded by theft and destruction of items placed in governmental storage. Leading up to their incarceration, Nikkei were prohibited from leaving the Military Zones or traveling more than 5 miles (8.0 km) from home, forcing those who had to travel for work, like truck farmers and residents of rural towns, to quit their jobs. Many others were simply fired for their “Jap” heritage.
Alien land laws in the West Coast states barred the Issei from owning their pre-war homes and farms. Many had cultivated land for decades as tenant farmers, but they lost their rights to farm those lands when they were forced to leave. Other Issei (and Nisei who were renting or had not completed payments on their property) had found families willing to occupy their homes or tend their farms during their incarceration. However, those unable to strike a deal with caretakers had to sell their property, often in a matter of days and at great financial loss to predatory land speculators, who made huge profits.”
So do you have any recommendations how to handle the Jihadists who kill/maim Americans?
Or would you just leave them alone because you feel safe?
I fail to see how this has anything to do with the msm trying to sully Trump because he wants to stop un-vetted muslims from entering America. Are you suggesting that because FDR (I think it was) put Japanese Americans into internment camps back in the 40s during a time of a World War, that somehow that translates to Trump and there for his supporters are nazi like?
“They werenât imprisoned. They were told they couldnât live in certain areas, and camps were for those who had no place else to go”
Well yes, if they are forbidden from being anywhere other than the camps, thus having nowhere to go, and therefore having to live in the camps.
Are you sure you got your information correct? Not saying you are wrong, I’ve just never knew this.
Sure. Round every Muslim in the world up and move them to Antarctica.
It wasn’t just the Germans...Hungarian immigrants and their all American descendants and any Americans whose ancestors came here from any of the German allies, in WW I, were treated badly; their stores boycotted, services not hired, products not bought, etc.! Even some products, like “Danish” pastry ( there’s NOTHING “Danish: about it...it’s a Hungarian pastry ! )were called something completely different.
You have any pics of the Bataan Death March handy?
“The internment was wrong. Very wrong.
Thereâs a difference between theft of possessions and wrongful imprisonment”
You are aware that there were spies—real spies—among the Japanese/AJA population, right?
When somebody dies in a war, they’re really dead. No overs, no mulligans. As much as I despise FDR, it had to be done.
Perhaps it's also an age difference amongst posters.
\
"According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages.The first stage being "demoralization". It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy. In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generation of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism; American patriotism."--KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov--Soviet Subversion of the Free Press (Ideological subversion, Destabilization, CRISIS - and the KGB)
Strategic Success!?
German, Italian and Japanese CITIZENS living in the United States were interned during the war.
Nobody is criticizing the US for interning foreign citizens. The difference is that the only AMERICAN citizens interned were those of Japanese origin. Americans whose ancestors came from Germany and Italy were definitely not interned.
Cute!
So you have no plan or suggestions!
Oh gee........yes, the enemy has won quite a lot.
The interesting thing is, the Japanese who were interned have been rather understanding of it. I know some of them are bitter about it, and they do address it. None the less they do it in a reasoned manner. Their lives were negatively impacted, and significantly.
Compare their plight of some other groups who have whined for fifty years, have used their plight to justify not doing anything to better themselves, and are continually blaming everyone but themselves for their situation.
My biggest beef about what was done to the Japanese here, is that their personal property was absconded with and liquidated.
That was not right > IMO.
Some things you may have to do, but you do it in as humane a way as possible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.