Skip to comments.
Police: Man wiped summons 'between his butt cheeks'
UPI ^
| 10/16/2015
| Ben Hooper
Posted on 10/19/2015 10:42:22 AM PDT by simpson96
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: ROCKLOBSTER
A New Jersey man is facing charges for allegedly wiping "between his butt cheeks" with a police summons I would like to be shown the chapter/section/subsection/paragraph of the statute that defines his crime.
This is New Jersey. I would bet they could indeed show you the "chapter/section/subsection/paragraph of the statute that defines his crime."
Introduced in 2004 by State Senator C. O. Rupt, it's known as the Butt Cheeks Bill. It passed the state house and senate.
21
posted on
10/19/2015 10:53:09 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
To: simpson96
Let’s hope it becomes a movement
22
posted on
10/19/2015 10:55:50 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Responsibility2nd
I’d like to believe ya butt...
23
posted on
10/19/2015 10:57:03 AM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republican Freed the Slaves" month.)
To: simpson96
Is that against protocol?
24
posted on
10/19/2015 10:58:30 AM PDT
by
discostu
(Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
To: simpson96
To: simpson96
26
posted on
10/19/2015 11:00:56 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: simpson96
Nice. Every once in a while, you read about someone who writes an obscenity on a summons or other court paper, or does something like this. While it may give the person a momentary good feeling, and may be a fantasy of sticking it to the system, its never a good idea to do it in reality. The courts don’t take kindly to this type of juvenile stunt.
27
posted on
10/19/2015 11:00:58 AM PDT
by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: simpson96
...fourth-degree charge of throwing bodily fluids... Wow! Was he naked and sweating (or worse) when he did this?
28
posted on
10/19/2015 11:11:53 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Two days in the stocks seems about appropriate.
29
posted on
10/19/2015 11:14:32 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: simpson96
You've Been Served!
To: simpson96
For any stupid teen (myself included) this is common practice for handing something to your good friend.
31
posted on
10/19/2015 11:29:19 AM PDT
by
envisio
(I ain't here long... I'm out of napalm and .22 bullets.)
To: NorthMountain
32
posted on
10/19/2015 11:41:36 AM PDT
by
ETL
(Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better and safer America)
To: simpson96
What? No assault charge as well for throwing a projectile at the officer?
33
posted on
10/19/2015 11:49:28 AM PDT
by
dmz
To: ETL
Yeah ... I was thinkin’ of him ... the (Not so) Phantom $#!++3r.
34
posted on
10/19/2015 11:50:23 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
To: NorthMountain
35
posted on
10/19/2015 12:00:03 PM PDT
by
ETL
(Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better and safer America)
To: Responsibility2nd
You thinking flinging poo at someone should be legal?
To: Slings and Arrows
37
posted on
10/19/2015 12:59:20 PM PDT
by
day10
(You'll get nothing and like it!)
To: simpson96
Brings to mind the 'stink hand'
38
posted on
10/19/2015 2:36:04 PM PDT
by
Bobalu
(Russians.... not ashamed of being white!)
To: day10; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
Why not? Barky wiped his *** with the Constitution.
39
posted on
10/19/2015 4:03:36 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(My music: http://hopalongginsberg.com/ | Facebook: Hopalong Ginsberg | Instagram: hopalonginsberg)
To: simpson96
"he was issued the summons by Lt. John Insabella of the Readington Police Department on a municipal court charge of threatening to assault another person."
Unless the Lt. is a member of the stasi his summons is not worth (pun intended) sh!t .
Cops can't do dittly without a court order, with a judge's signature.
John Bad Elk v. United States :: 177 U.S. 529 (1900)
40
posted on
10/19/2015 4:28:45 PM PDT
by
SERE_DOC
( “The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” TJ.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson