Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brave new world: Mayor de Blasio bans NYC employers from asking applicants about criminal history
Hotair ^ | 06/30/2015 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 06/30/2015 7:18:25 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

I’m guessing this is the new face of equality. Or at least a redefinition of sanity. In any case, welcome to the Big Apple, employers! (From the NY Daily News)

In front of emotional supporters, Mayor de Blasio signed legislation Monday that will prohibit employers from inquiring about a candidate’s criminal record prior to a job offer.

“Today I see hope for people like me,” said Marilyn Scales, 52, of the Bronx, who said she never has had a full-time job because of her record for dealing heroin.

As crazy as this may sound, there’s actually a bit more to this law than meets the eye from the brief Daily News account. That’s not to say that there’s some revelation coming here which makes this a good idea, but it’s a bit more nuanced. To begin with, it was already illegal to deny someone employment based solely on their having a record of criminal convictions unless that record poses a clear threat to persons or property. (Ostensibly, you didn’t have to hire somebody as your accountant who had already been convicted of embezzlement multiple times.) Also, employers couldn’t legally ask about arrests if those arrests were not part of a currently open case or had not led to a conviction.

But as with many regulations regarding the hiring process, that wasn’t too hard for employers to get around since there are so many factors which go into hiring decisions. This new law, however, adds a wrinkle to the process which will be problematic for employers. As the New York Association for Community Living explains, employment application questions will now fall into a complicated, multi-step process which could lead to all sorts of new legal entanglements. (They are speaking specifically to the concerns of non-profits, but this applies to pretty much everyone.)

The law takes effect 120 days from Mayor Bill de Blasio’s signature of approval, which by all accounts the Mayor is expected to provide very soon. Beginning on that date, covered employers must follow a three-step procedure for inquiries about an applicant’s criminal history:

1. First, the employer must issue a written copy of the inquiry in a manner to be determined by the New York City Commission on Human Rights (the “Commission”). Although the law is silent about whether the Commission will issue a mandatory inquiry form or simply prescribe requirements for such inquiries, employers will at least need to tailor their criminal history inquiries accordingly.

2. Second, before a conditional offer of employment is revoked, employers must provide the applicant a written copy of its analysis of the criminal history, including the reason(s) it revoked the conditional job offer and the supporting documents that formed the basis of the employer’s decision, e.g., the criminal history results.

3. Finally, the employer must allow the applicant a reasonable amount of time—no less than three business days—to respond to the revocation of the job offer, during which time the employer must hold the position open for the applicant.

In other words, if you were previously disinclined to hire somebody who spent a large part of their previous summers at the crowbar motel for slinging heroin, you could probably just fail to schedule them for an interview. But under this system, you don’t get to find out about the record unless they make it through the interview process and you tender an initial, conditional offer of employment to them. Only then can you dig into their criminal history. And if it turns out that they have the sort of record which would lead you to not want them as an employee, you have to send them a letter explaining why you were pulling the offer. That opens up you, as the employer, to charges under the aforementioned law against refusing to hire based on criminal background and…

Law Suits! (DING DING DING DING)

The sad part is, even if somebody challenges it, this law will probably hold up in court. Between the taxes, the fees and the massive regulatory burden it’s already hard enough to do business in New York. I wonder how many more employers will simply flee to a more business friendly climate after this?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; akadeblasio; alsharpton; andrewcuomo; billdeblasio; blackkk; bluezone; chirlanemccray; criminal; deblasio; edisonproperties; election2016; employers; felonvote; newjersey; newyork; newyorkcity; nyc; nypd; rafaelramos; stevenislick; wenjianliu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
In every single job in NYC and Long Island that accepted me (including my current one), the employer first checked criminal background and required me to submit a urine and drug test.
1 posted on 06/30/2015 7:18:25 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Brave new world: Mayor de Blasio bans NYC employers from asking applicants about criminal history”

Does this apply to people applying to be on the police force?


2 posted on 06/30/2015 7:21:10 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah, they always asked if I had anything more than traffic citations, and made me pee in a bottle.


3 posted on 06/30/2015 7:23:24 PM PDT by BigEdLB (They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Under what statute do they have the right to regulate this?


4 posted on 06/30/2015 7:23:38 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The background check is a must, and in certain positions so is the testing.

This is one PC stance that will be reversed in short order.

The first guy that kills a co-worker and they find out he was a very problematic guy criminal record wise, the City of New York will pay out more money than mast people make in a lifetime.

How do people with this little common sense become mayor?


5 posted on 06/30/2015 7:24:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
How do people with this little common sense become mayor?

Money.

6 posted on 06/30/2015 7:26:53 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Simple, the electorate has less common sense than DeBozio.


7 posted on 06/30/2015 7:27:04 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Another reason for companies to leave NY City.

The de Blasio decline of the Big Apple continues.


8 posted on 06/30/2015 7:27:33 PM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You mean those sophisticated employers of NYC won’t be able to spot the 5, 10, 15 year etc. gaps in the resume? Won’t call the alleged former employers? Won’t spot the “parole officer” cited as a professional or character reference? Won’t require transcripts, diplomas, or licenses from cited institutions? And they call us unsophisticated country bumpkins.


9 posted on 06/30/2015 7:28:17 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (No matter the laws that get passed or the edicts given they are just queers, freaks and perverts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

“Under what statute do they have the right to regulate this?”

I’m wondering also. What if it was made “law” that interviewers had to do a headstand while conducting the job interview? Would that also be legal?


10 posted on 06/30/2015 7:28:53 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So banksters and wall street can’t ask about your criminal background. Sweet. I think if I had a large firm I would be looking to Houston for some new digs.


11 posted on 06/30/2015 7:29:18 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Does this legislation include the NY school district?


12 posted on 06/30/2015 7:33:12 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Did deBlasio train in Chicago?


13 posted on 06/30/2015 7:36:01 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Couldn’t imagine enough to see this dingbat obtain a seat.


14 posted on 06/30/2015 7:40:05 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Aren’t liberal nirvanas great?


15 posted on 06/30/2015 7:40:14 PM PDT by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

That sounds about right.


16 posted on 06/30/2015 7:40:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I hope no employer ever asks about my account on FreeRepublic.


17 posted on 06/30/2015 7:42:13 PM PDT by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Down with convictophobes.


18 posted on 06/30/2015 7:42:32 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

China, Mexico, etc. are delighted at the news. They know it will spread to the rest of the country and more jobs will be heading their way.


19 posted on 06/30/2015 7:43:13 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

The “it’s good to be king” statute.


20 posted on 06/30/2015 7:44:31 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson