Posted on 06/21/2015 7:06:01 AM PDT by rktman
Voters who disagree with the Democratic party’s platform are only a few Confederate flag sightings away from donning a hood and burning some crosses, apparently. Is this why the U.S. is “essentially a nation of cowards” when it comes to discussing race, as former Attorney General Eric Holder famously said?
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Democrats used the same tactics against blacks in the Jim Crow south that they use against conservatives today...
How long have these leftist aholes been moderating this “discussion of race”?
For over half a century.
And where have they led us?
To the worst racial tension and hatred this nation has ever seen.
What we should be demanding is that the DemocRats stop stirring up the US citizenry like rats in a cage.
Sadly, a small part of me just wishes they would accelerate their attempt at the total destruction of the Constitution already. At this stage, I’m still young enough and fit enough to play my part in restoring it. I would rather it be me, so I can I hopefully pass along to my young boys what I enjoyed growing up with.
Maybe Hillary will soon break out with her black southern dialect?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FlpbRFXC9E
The internals for the Americans of African descent voters must not look good.
When politicians step forward and loudly advocate a solution that clearly cannot solve a problem, either they are showing their utter ignorance or they are trying to advance something the public would reject if it were clearly announced.
1-Universal background checks (which means they have a record of who owns the guns, which is just as bad as registration)
2-A period of restricting an increasing listed of banned guns.
3-Confiscation
4-Tyranny
Kinda like a spoof on “In Living Color.”? If you can’t do the accent, don’t try it. It only makes you look more ridiculuoser than you already are.
Per the lyin’ king, no “wild eyed plan” to take folks guns away. What you listed certainly doesn’t look wild eyed. Just a plan. :>}
“For a lot of well-meaning, open-minded white people, the sight of a young black man in a hoodie still evokes a twinge of fear.”
Yeah it does. Google the “Knock Out Game”.
The overt racism of the past has now come down to micro-aggressive racism yet the liberal rhetoric has substantially increased. The tensions between the races has increased substantially under this administration and Hillary needs to fan the flames to keep the Obama voting block.
Clinton has no moral authority or is not in any position to pass judgment on anybody. Yet, here she is, bloviating about the usual crock of liberal crap about how evil white people are.
The silence or the pathetic bland statements given by Republicans ("Sadly, Mrs. Clinton is simply misguided on this issue...") just shows how complicit they are in continuing the destruction of our nation.
My sentiments exactly. Up here in Canada, for years liberals have used Gamil Gharbi’s bloody rampage (shooting and stabbing 14 women students to death) at Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal just to simply slander conservatives or those who opposed the badly conceived gun registry (now repealed) or Albertans or Americans.
As to White Privilege that wold seem to disqualify Hillary from everything was she has had it all her life. It is amazing how we equate being white as if they were the only people to own slaves when the history of the world is rife with multiple examples of slavery in all form and by all peoples.
They have the unions, the poor whites, the liberals and other miscreants so all they have to do is pander to the middle and the swing voters. It does not take a huge percentage of the vote to win the race. That boys and girls is why they focus on the 13% or so of us that are black and the up and coming brown vote. They are confident of their base and the pubicrats are sure of theirs. The middle is all that is important.
Romney was right about at least that one thing.. 47% won’t vote pubicrat anyway.
The rats have about a 4% advantage on the pubicrats all the time.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx
This cold eyed monster is up to her earlobes in bloody scandals and she thinks she can lecture all of us on morality. She will have to face these scandals on her campaign trail, sooner or later. She can’t misdirect forever.
I don’t know the details about the Church in Charleston, but it would appear to me that had they had a person or people there who were armed the casualties would likely be fewer.
I detest violence, but at the same time, I am sorry, but the problem is less about weapons and more about people in the people who are violent criminals.
The IRS, DOJ, EPA, etc. will be the ones deciding whose “hearts are full of hate”. They’ll just be expanding on what they’re doing now, punishing “thought crime” that’s what totalitarian governments do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.