Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ: Children Do Not Need—and Have No Right to--Mothers
CNSNews ^

Posted on 03/03/2013 4:58:50 PM PST by Sub-Driver

DOJ: Children Do Not Need—and Have No Right to--Mothers March 3, 2013 By Terence P. Jeffrey

Georgetown Law School. (AP Photo/Haraz Ghanbari) (CNSNews.com) - The Obama Justice Department is arguing in the United States Supreme Court that children do not need mothers.

The Justice Department’s argument on the superfluity of motherhood is presented in a brief the Obama administration filed in the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry, which challenges the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the California ballot initiative that amended California’s Constitution to say that marriage involves only one man and one woman.

The Justice Department presented its conclusions about parenthood in rebutting an argument made by proponents of Proposition 8 that the traditional two-parent family, led by both a mother and a father, was the ideal place, determined even by nature itself, to raise a child.

The Obama administration argues this is not true. It argues that children need neither a father nor a mother and that having two fathers or two mothers is just as good as having one of each.

“The [California] Voter Guide arguably offered a distinct but related child-rearing justification for Proposition 8: 'the best situation for a child is to be raised by a married mother and father,’” said the administration’s brief submitted to the court by Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr.

“As an initial matter, no sound basis exists for concluding that same-sex couples who have committed to marriage are anything other than fully capable of responsible parenting and child-rearing,” the Department of Justice told the court. “To the contrary, many leading medical, psychological, and social-welfare organizations have issued policy statements opposing restrictions on gay and lesbian parenting based on their conclusion, supported by numerous scientific studies, that...

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: antifamily; bravenewworld; california; childrenofthestate; childrights; communism; communistmanifesto; corruption; democrats; doj; dojoutofcontrol; family; fatherhood; fathers; govtabuse; holder; homosexualagenda; liberals; moralabsolutes; motherhood; mothers; obama; parenthood; progressives; prop8; samesexfamily; samesexmarriage; socialistdemocrats; theywantyourchildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
FIRED.............
1 posted on 03/03/2013 4:58:52 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Welcome to the new Soviet Union, comrade. Children do not need mothers or fathers, they have the State. The almighty State; for all your needs, from cradle to grave. Long live the State.


2 posted on 03/03/2013 5:03:42 PM PST by john drake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Sickening.


3 posted on 03/03/2013 5:04:59 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john drake

All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state. — Benito Mussolini


4 posted on 03/03/2013 5:06:20 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"DOJ: Children Do Not Need—and Have No Right to--Mothers..."

The hard left is doing their utmost to destroy the culture and bring on the Borg collective. These freaks have become totally unhinged.

5 posted on 03/03/2013 5:06:41 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Yeah, that’s why “Mommy!” is so often heard from the severely injured, well into adulthood.


6 posted on 03/03/2013 5:08:54 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john drake

the commie rules of 1963 stated to take children away from the influence of parents, ever since that is what the left has been doing and why fairy boy in the white house is upset if head start etc is cut in any way , shape or form.

What gets me is how our side fail all the time to understand whta the left is doing, . They have written it out over years, Cloward and Piven, Rules for radical Alinsky and 1963.

For some reason our side plays defense all the time instead of going after the left and be pro active.


7 posted on 03/03/2013 5:08:55 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How far we have fallen when our government argues this abomination.


8 posted on 03/03/2013 5:09:25 PM PST by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

the left know the backbone of this country is the family and they have always hated the family and thta is why we see them fight so hard to redefine family.

Our side has to grow a set of balls and go after them, mention that family is a mother and a father, and it is they who raise their children, it is they who are responsible for their children, whether feeding them to clothing them to educating them


9 posted on 03/03/2013 5:11:33 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They determined years ago that children do not need fathers. Now it’s mothers children also do not need. Right?


10 posted on 03/03/2013 5:12:54 PM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

That door was opened with favored constituents of both political parties abolishing fatherhood and passing laws against fatherhood. If you want to know how they get away with it, BTW, look up some info on “parens patriae.”


11 posted on 03/03/2013 5:13:32 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

the freaks really are running the asylum


12 posted on 03/03/2013 5:14:46 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

those “on the right” that play dumb are really just progressive operatives in the republican party

remember, the best way to insure your political policies are enacted is to be on both sides of the ticket


13 posted on 03/03/2013 5:16:16 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This is sheer evil.


14 posted on 03/03/2013 5:16:20 PM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We are departing more and more from the family structure that God has ordained and which has been the backbone of civilization for millennia.


15 posted on 03/03/2013 5:16:38 PM PST by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I would argue that the persons alleging no need for mothers must recuse themselves unless they can prove that they arrived on this earth without gestation in a mother's womb. If that can't be proven, the individual has no standing. Will Holder present proof of an in vitro clone raised without any kind of human womb for gestation?
16 posted on 03/03/2013 5:17:05 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

Dude, that has been the goal of compulsory schooling since the turn of last century. Alinsky is a latecomer.


17 posted on 03/03/2013 5:21:26 PM PST by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why is the Justice Department wasting my fugging money arguing this Bullshyt.

If it wasn’t for the fruit in the White House the Federal Government would not be sticking it’s Homo nose into a States business.
It doesn’t belong there.

If Obama wants to save money cut out all of this Justice Department interference in States business.

This Justice Department spends more time fighting Social issues than it does Criminal ones.


18 posted on 03/03/2013 5:21:26 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The Obama administration argues this is not true. It argues that children need neither a father nor a mother and that having two fathers or two mothers is just as good as having one of each.

And an incubator and a state-run camp would be even better, eh comrade?

19 posted on 03/03/2013 5:23:05 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I feel a song coming on. ( Layers of meaning here, eh? )
20 posted on 03/03/2013 5:23:50 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson