well... they've been saying that about FATHERS for over 40 years!Welcome to the new Soviet Union, comrade. Children do not need mothers or fathers, they have the State. The almighty State; for all your needs, from cradle to grave. Long live the State.
Sickening.
The hard left is doing their utmost to destroy the culture and bring on the Borg collective. These freaks have become totally unhinged.
Yeah, that’s why “Mommy!” is so often heard from the severely injured, well into adulthood.
How far we have fallen when our government argues this abomination.
They determined years ago that children do not need fathers. Now it’s mothers children also do not need. Right?
That door was opened with favored constituents of both political parties abolishing fatherhood and passing laws against fatherhood. If you want to know how they get away with it, BTW, look up some info on “parens patriae.”
the freaks really are running the asylum
This is sheer evil.
We are departing more and more from the family structure that God has ordained and which has been the backbone of civilization for millennia.
Why is the Justice Department wasting my fugging money arguing this Bullshyt.
If it wasn’t for the fruit in the White House the Federal Government would not be sticking it’s Homo nose into a States business.
It doesn’t belong there.
If Obama wants to save money cut out all of this Justice Department interference in States business.
This Justice Department spends more time fighting Social issues than it does Criminal ones.
And an incubator and a state-run camp would be even better, eh comrade?
well... they've been saying that about FATHERS for over 40 years!Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.This is the kind of reasoning that is at the core of efforts like this. Even worse, Marx perverts the study of history in his treatise Origin Of The Family, which has been but one cause of the many perverted experiments of this day.
On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.
The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.
But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.
And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, et cetera? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.
The bourgeois claptrap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor. …
— Communist Manifesto, Chapter 2
Dear Leader will care for the children. Where have we heard this before?