Constitutional Eligibility
Posted on 01/27/2013 4:51:39 PM PST by Greystoke
This is our country. We live in it, and we have a right to the kind of country we want. We would not allow the French or the United Nations to rule us, and neither should we allow people who died over two centuries ago and knew nothing of our country as it exists today. If we are to take back our own country, we have to start making decisions for ourselves, and stop deferring to an ancient and outdated document.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Who's the "our" and the "we"?
Yeah let’s get rid of that doggone “freedom of the press” thing, it’s so outdated. Everyone now knows that the truth doesn’t matter and CBW et al are just mouthpieces for tyrants.
So let’s get rid of that, what could the Framers have known 200 years ago about Cronkite and Rather, right?
Constitutional Eligibility
What indeed?
Outrageous! They're getting more and more brazen. Thanks for the Ping.
.
.
Lefties must beware of the many millions of invisible men walking among you
Tyranny historically has had huge consequences.....
Does the left think they are “special” and “immune”?
.
.
Fortunately, the framers of the Constitution had a heck of a lot more intelligence and common sense than he has. Without the Constitution as a framework for republican government and the supreme law of the land, there would never have been a United States as we know it (or more accurately as we knew it). Instead, we would be just like any other of the many dictatorships that have been the curse of mankind throughout recorded history, rather than a uniquely benign society devoted to liberty, prosperity and dignity of the citizen.
What difference does it make if Obama isn't a natural born citizen? Hey, Seidman, just look around you. The framers of the Constitution sensed that a President without unquestioned American roots might well act counter to the interests of the United States, and, as Obama's rash disregard for the country and its Constitution has proved, the framers had keen foresight.
Fortunately, the framers of the Constitution had a heck of a lot more intelligence and common sense than he has. Without the Constitution as a framework for republican government and the supreme law of the land, there would never have been a United States as we know it (or more accurately as we knew it). Instead, we would be just like any other of the many dictatorships that have been the curse of mankind throughout recorded history, rather than a uniquely benign society devoted to liberty, prosperity and dignity of the citizen.
What difference does it make if Obama isn't a natural born citizen? Hey, Seidman, just look around you. The framers of the Constitution sensed that a President without unquestioned American roots might well act counter to the interests of the United States, and, as Obama's rash disregard for the country and its Constitution has proved, the framers had keen foresight.
The Constitution is the only thing standing in Obama’s way. I bet he gave CBS the idea.
> Are these treasonous pukes for real?
Unfortunately yes and they blindly follow their messiah and are not good at foresight as to what the consequences of their actions will be. I’ve never seen such a naive and gullible generation as the one being groomed for servitude that we have right now. They are being led to the slaughter and don’t even realize it. I wonder how Moochie feels sleeping with the Anti-Christ every night.
Yes. They disrespect the “old dead white guys” who forged the nation and our Constitution, BECAUSE they know the founders are right and they are evil vermin.
Why do you think racist Obozo hates white guys? He is the racist Liar-in-Chief and he serves the Father-of-Lies.
When “the right people” want him exposed, it will happen.
Sure lets make some changes to the Constitution....
Change the 26th Amendment and raise the voting age to 30 and above or starters...: )
28th Amendment - subversion of the Constitution by the MSM, POTUS, SCOTUS, Congress = death
: )
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/337023/mega-cheers-honesty-c-jay-nordlinger#
excerpt:
Honesty, honesty — what more can we want in argument and politics? In election season, I’m always pleading for candidates to campaign honestly. To just say what they believe, whatever it is. If you want a socialist state, or a European-style social democracy — say so, forthrightly. Make your case.
It’s the Alinskyism — the deception — that’s so awful.
When Nixon lost the California gubernatorial election in 1962, an aide tried to console him. Nixon — who had been vice president for eight years and loved the big, global issues — said, “Oh, that’s all right. At least I won’t have to talk about crap like drug abuse anymore.”
Obama’s winning reelection must be a relief to him. Never again will he have to say things like, “America is the greatest nation on earth.” In his two campaigns — 2008 and 2012 — he always said them, when he had to say them, like a hostage with a gun in his back. He might as well have blinked “T-O-R-T-U-R-E.”
good response, zero lies because if he told the truth, no one would have voted for him.
Because their souls have a cheap price and Satan is buying up both parties.
I can see some advantages here.
The US Constitution is the charter document of the United States. You join the USA by signing on to it. End the Constitution, you dissolve the Union.
Since there is little common ground left, it would be nice if red and blue could go their own ways.
“...ancient outdated document”
...only to its enemies.
It is the People’s Constitution professor. THE PEOPLE’S.
“This is a preface to the new step which will be a call for a constitutional convention to “fix” the Constitution. Lord help us if THAT ever happens”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
A HEARTY AMEN TO THAT BROTHER!!! Even on FR some have raised the suggestion of a “con-con” lately. I delight in going on record as considering that to be a very, very misguided idea.
When you have a prescription for a medicine that is known to have worked without fail for over two hundred years anytime it is used why on Earth would you throw it away and demand that a new prescription be written in a committee meeting open to every kind of quack in existence?
Our problem is a gangster government that refuses to recognize any kind of limits, how can people imagine that that problem can be fixed by changing the nature of the limits that they refuse to obey? If you draw a line in the sand and the bully steps over it do you simply draw another line? To me it is mind-boggling that anyone could seriously suggest that we ought to do this. This seems so obvious that I don’t even consider it a matter of opinion unless you consider the sunrise to be a matter of opinion.
Can you imagine a Constitution rewrite by Pelosi, Obama and a few RINOs? Granted we have quite a few red states out there. However i would see nothing good coming out of it from our perspective. These liberals are on a transformation roll. Whats next? Immigration and gun control. Then VAT and global warming taxes. We have no one fighting for us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.