Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pixels Don't Lie
March 4, 2012 | Linda Jordan

Posted on 03/04/2012 11:50:20 AM PST by ethical

To prove that the birth document Obama posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulent document, all you need to determine is whether or not it is a computer created document or a scanned photocopy.

It is a computer created document. Even the obots can not deny that.

You do not need to ask the Hawaii DOH for a "waiver" in order to get a computer created birth document. Obama asked for special permission from Hawaii DOH to get photocopies of his original birth certificate. Loretta Fuddy granted that request and gave Obama, she says, photocopies of his original birth certificate.

Scanning a photocopy, in order to post it on a website, does not turn it in to a computer created document with multiple layers and movable text. Although interesting, it isn't all the details of the forgery that first reveal that it's a fake; different fonts, the halos, the weird bent page, the strange behavior of the security paper. It is the fact that it IS a computer created document and NOT a scanned photocopy.

But let's look at one of those fun forgery details. I included the web addresses for the quote and images I describe.

Here is what Chiyome Fukino [Former Director of Hawaii Public Health Department] had to say about how the “birthers” would respond to the release of Obama’s birth certificate.

“They’re going to question the ink on which it was written or say it was fabricated.” Said Fukino. “The whole thing is silly.”1

Let’s start with the ink, shall we?

From Hawaii Public Health Regulations Title: Vital Statistics, Registration & Records. Chapter 8, Certificates of Vital Statistics Events, Section 1. Preparation. Certificates of vital statistics events are to be filled in by typewriter or in ink. If ink is used only permanent ink will be acceptable. All signatures are to be made with permanent ink. In all other respects, the certificates shall comply with provisions of Section 57-14, R.L.H. 1955.”

On April 27, 2011 Barack Obama revealed what he said was a photo copy of his original long form ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ from Hawaii (it was posted on the White House website). The signatures on this ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ are required to be made in permanent ink.

Pixels Don’t Lie

Download the BC document off the White House website and open it in Adobe Illustrator. Now zoom in on the signature of Obama’s mother. The pixels reveal that only a portion of the signature is in ink as required by Hawaii Public Health Regulations Chapter 8.

The Ann and the D in Dunham are in ink. The pixels are a variety of gradations in greys and blacks, like ink signature pixels are. But what’s really interesting is that the rest of the signature, ‘unham and Obama’, are not in ink.

The letters are a solid greenish–black color with no gradation in color at all. This lack of gradation reveals that this part of the signature was created in the computer and is not even penmanship.

And what’s it called when you forge a signature on a “Certificate of Live Birth” from Hawaii? FORGERY! Well that would be my top pick but hey they also violated Hawaii Public Health Regulations by not using permanent ink in their forgery! Maybe that’ll tick someone off.

If you ignore the fact that this document was computer created and that fact, in and of itself, makes it a forgery, you can't deny what the pixels are telling us.

The Stanley Ann Dunham Obama signature on this document is a forged signature and that makes the whole document a forgery.

Figure 1. The Dunham part of the signature of Obama’s mother on the alleged long form original ‘Certificate of Live Birth’, posted on the White House website. Here it has been downloaded into Adobe Illustrator.

Figure 2. Zooming in on the top part of the ‘D’ in Dunham. You can see the variation in color pixels—variations of grays to black tones. This is how pixels of a signature will appear when it is applied with ink and scanned.

Figure 3. Focusing now on the start of the ‘u’ next to the D in Dunham. You can see there is no gradation of color at all. A solid dark greenish-black color displays no evidence of the gradation in color for these pixels which implies that this “signature” was created with image editing software and not with ink.

Figure 4. The last image focuses on the O in ‘Obama’ and part of the b. You can see there is no color change in the pixels. The solid pixel color again suggests the signature was not scanned or representative of ink. The ‘Obama’ portion of the signature was computer generated.

1. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42519951/ns/politics-more_politics/t/ex-hawaii-official-denounces-ludicrous-birther-claims/ 2. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

3. Albert Renshaw Obama BC Fake http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2manycrooks; 2manyingovernment; 2muchisfixed; birftards; birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; fake; forged; hopespringseternal; lucyhazfootball; naturalborncitizen; obama; thefixisin; thistimeforsure; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2012 11:50:30 AM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ethical

Ya but . . . who’s going to do anything about it? That judge in Georgia just passed on his duties and I suspect that will be the case going forward.


2 posted on 03/04/2012 11:57:18 AM PST by jakota (jakota)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Evidence abounds, but few media outlets are touching this story. Even the conservative media ignores it.


3 posted on 03/04/2012 11:57:41 AM PST by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical
You won't ever get any Obamabots to admit that the BC is forged, even after they've seen proof.

Chances are that some congressional republicans will ignore proof as well, they don't want impeachment and the ensuing chaos on their watch. They simply don't have the cajones to uphold the law.

4 posted on 03/04/2012 11:58:37 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical
what’s it called when you forge a signature on a “Certificate of Live Birth”

Apparently Acceptable.
Relax comrade. Don't be ridiculous.

Hey look at the new war that just started!!!!!

5 posted on 03/04/2012 12:07:54 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (BO Stinks! Like Mitts magic underwear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Notice how long time Clintonista Trump is now in bed with Romney?


Mitt's daddy was a Mexican. He isn't eligible either!

6 posted on 03/04/2012 12:10:22 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (BO Stinks! Like Mitts magic underwear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ethical

7 posted on 03/04/2012 12:11:11 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

It has always been my opinion that 1) Obama was born in Hawaii and 2) he cannot prove it.


8 posted on 03/04/2012 12:20:40 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

It has always been my opinion that 1) Obama was born in Hawaii and 2) he cannot prove it.


9 posted on 03/04/2012 12:20:51 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

“Pixels Don’t Lie “

However, obama does LIE


10 posted on 03/04/2012 12:24:21 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Someone on our side needs to do a serious review of mid-’80s electronic document processing - before we get seriously embarrassed by the ignorant rhetoric being thrown around by the “multiple layers + multiple resolutions = fake” crowd. Please trust me guys: you’re building yourselves a trap and walking into it.


11 posted on 03/04/2012 12:34:36 PM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

I am no Mitt fan, but Mitt’s father was an American citizen when Mitt was born.


12 posted on 03/04/2012 12:50:39 PM PST by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2; ethical
Yes, it is idiotic to parse a PDF which breaks a document scan into layers. 30 minutes of research, or a simple download of Adobe acrobat would explain all these issue. Plus it ignores the other image released the same day that wasn't layered. It is trailer park analysis of a computer document - embarrassing for conservatives, and helping Obama.


13 posted on 03/04/2012 12:55:03 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ethical
You should submit the document and all those photoshopped high school pictures of Obama's basketball teammates, sitting on the bench with grandma and grandpa, etc. to Photoshop Disasters.
14 posted on 03/04/2012 1:04:35 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keats5

And we must not forget the GOP congresscritters who are all silent on this matter and who are, most likely, co-conspirators with the rest of them.


15 posted on 03/04/2012 1:16:29 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: keats5

And Dan Rather still claims the Bush Memos are fake but accurate.

The media didn’t like that exposure either.


16 posted on 03/04/2012 1:21:52 PM PST by a fool in paradise (If Obama brings troops home from Japan and Germany he can claim he won WWII finally as well as Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

Signature of Local Registrar: ‘U K Li Lee’

They’re playing the American public like a miniature guitar.

This is an ‘In Your Face’ challenge.


17 posted on 03/04/2012 1:25:10 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

He was born to a bigamist father, his marriage was a sham.

Did Barry ever become an Indonesian citizen when his mom remarried?


18 posted on 03/04/2012 1:30:14 PM PST by a fool in paradise (If Obama brings troops home from Japan and Germany he can claim he won WWII finally as well as Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
" they don't want impeachment and the ensuing chaos . . . . . "

You cannot impeach a "president" that was never legal and therefore legally elected. Impeachment is a 'political' mater. His transgression is a felony and should be handled by the legal system.

19 posted on 03/04/2012 1:41:51 PM PST by Freeper (Obama - Please STOP representing MY country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
" they don't want impeachment and the ensuing chaos . . . . . "

You cannot impeach a "president" that was never legal and therefore legally elected. Impeachment is a 'political' mater. His transgression is a felony and should be handled by the legal system.

20 posted on 03/04/2012 1:42:03 PM PST by Freeper (Obama - Please STOP representing MY country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson