Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Proposes Adding ‘Unemployed’ to Protected Status
New York Times ^ | September 26, 2011 | ROBERT PEAR

Posted on 09/26/2011 11:29:43 AM PDT by reaganaut1

President Obama has not been particularly successful in fostering the creation of jobs. But he thinks he has found a way to pry open doors in the workplace for many of the unemployed, especially those who have been out of work for a long time.

Mr. Obama’s jobs bill would prohibit employers from discriminating against job applicants because they are unemployed.

Under the proposal, it would be “an unlawful employment practice” if a business with 15 or more employees refused to hire a person “because of the individual’s status as unemployed.”

Unsuccessful job applicants could sue and recover damages for violations, just like when an employer discriminates on the basis of a person’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

White House officials see discrimination against the unemployed as a serious problem. In a radio interview last month, Mr. Obama said such discrimination made “absolutely no sense,” especially at a time when many people, through no fault of their own, had been laid off.

Mr. Obama’s proposal would also prohibit employment agencies and Web sites from carrying advertisements for job openings that exclude people who are unemployed. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has received reports of such advertisements but does not have data to show how common they are.

Republicans and some employers criticized the White House proposal. They said that discrimination was not common and that the proposed remedy could expose employers to a barrage of lawsuits.

“We do not see a need for it,” said Michael J. Eastman, executive director of labor law policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Already, Mr. Eastman said, the Civil Rights Act outlaws employment practices that have “a disparate impact on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin,”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 0bamathewaiver; alohabarryyourefired; bhofascism; bhosocialism; china; corporations; corruption; democrats; fraud; globalism; impeachthesob; liberalfascism; maobama; nobama2012; obama; socialism; socialistdemocrats; typicalbarackperson; unemployed; unemployment; yourefiredbarry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
First scare the heck out of businesses and discourage hiring, then extend unemployment insurance to two years to increase long-term unemployment, and finally make it easy to sue businesses for allegedly excluding the unemployed. I'm glad we have such a smart president /s.
1 posted on 09/26/2011 11:29:50 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
How about levying a tax on tax free municipal bonds ?
Is there nothing this man can't f’k up ?
2 posted on 09/26/2011 11:33:30 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Another segment of the population he’s pandering to for votes??? The unemployed??? Geesh!


3 posted on 09/26/2011 11:34:30 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Attaaaack Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatch!!!!! XD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

next will be terror suspects and Somali pirates.

you can’t discriminate against midnight naval property acquisition specialists.


4 posted on 09/26/2011 11:34:48 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Every time I see this proposal I am struck at just how d*mn dumb it is. You might as well title it the “If you aren’t employed now you never will be again” Bill.

No Business is going to risk interviewing ANY unemployed person for any position.


5 posted on 09/26/2011 11:35:25 AM PDT by The Working Man (The mantra for BO's reign...."No Child Left a Dime")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My guess is that Obama could not even DEFINE “free enterprise.”


6 posted on 09/26/2011 11:37:19 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Hey, I’m unemployed, well actually retired, but UNEMPLOYED. Does this mean that I am now a “protected class”? Oh goody. What do I get? Trips like on Wheel of Fortune?


7 posted on 09/26/2011 11:38:14 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The only people in America that do NOT belong to an Obama “Protected Class” are native-born, employed, non-obese, non-union, straight, White males.


8 posted on 09/26/2011 11:38:32 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Forget AMEX. Remember your Glock 27: Never Leave Home Without It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
First scare the heck out of businesses and discourage hiring, then extend unemployment insurance to two years to increase long-term unemployment, and finally make it easy to sue businesses for allegedly excluding the unemployed.

Well sure, when you put it like that it looks bad. But, The Won says these items are not related in any way and you should just go on about your day.
9 posted on 09/26/2011 11:38:42 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Boy, that is just frecking brilliant! Make the Unemployed “protected”. Then companies can be sued for not hiring the unemployed. Yeah, that’ll make companies want to stay in the US and invest. [/s]

Really, his agenda is to turn us into a bunch of mind-numbed, lazy bastards—totally dependent on the Government for handouts.


10 posted on 09/26/2011 11:38:51 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Are businesses now prohibited from asking for a résumé?


11 posted on 09/26/2011 11:39:01 AM PDT by southernnorthcarolina ("Better be wise by the misfortunes of others than by your own." -- Aesop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

bump


12 posted on 09/26/2011 11:39:01 AM PDT by lowbridge (Rep. Dingell: "Its taken a long time.....to control the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Mo money for reparations. Mo money for bums. Mo money for lawyers.

Insanity continues with Obozo at the helm


13 posted on 09/26/2011 11:39:29 AM PDT by Gasshog (going to get what all those libs asked for, but its not what they expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I am thoroughly disgusted with him and his bunch of thugs and thieves.


14 posted on 09/26/2011 11:40:05 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Obama is in a mad rush to destroy the US before January 20, 2013.
15 posted on 09/26/2011 11:40:30 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

He just made it harder for the unemployed to get jobs. Now they won’t even get an interview.


16 posted on 09/26/2011 11:41:12 AM PDT by Chandalier (You say Obama, I say O-blame-o!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Unsuccessful job applicants could sue and recover damages for violations, just like when an employer discriminates on the basis of a person’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

It's like this guy lies awake at night thinking of ways to screw the private sector. It's one thing after the next.

17 posted on 09/26/2011 11:41:40 AM PDT by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
But he thinks he has found a way to pry open doors in the workplace for many of the unemployed, especially those who have been out of work for a long time.

And yet, by constantly extending unemployment benefits, government provides ever greater positive incentives for those who have lost their jobs to remain unemployed for ever longer periods of time.

As a number of economists have shown, when unemployment benefits are extended, someone who has lost a job -- e.g., an engineer -- is further incentivized to remain unemployed until he has found another engineering job. That job might not actually exist. What the economy -- and the unemployed engineer, by the way -- really needs, however, is simply for the unemployed engineer to get off the public dole system and to start pulling his own weight. That might require that he accept a less-than-ideal job, perhaps on a production line somewhere.

18 posted on 09/26/2011 11:42:24 AM PDT by GoodDay (Palin for POTUS 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents
Oh goody. What do I get? Trips like on Wheel of Fortune?

Photobucket

19 posted on 09/26/2011 11:43:28 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Seems like everyone is a “Protected Status” citizen, except for the people who make this country work ...


20 posted on 09/26/2011 11:43:50 AM PDT by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson