First scare the heck out of businesses and discourage hiring, then extend unemployment insurance to two years to increase long-term unemployment, and finally make it easy to sue businesses for allegedly excluding the unemployed. I'm glad we have such a smart president /s.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: reaganaut1
How about levying a tax on tax free municipal bonds ?
Is there nothing this man can't f’k up ?
To: reaganaut1
Another segment of the population he’s pandering to for votes??? The unemployed??? Geesh!
3 posted on
09/26/2011 11:34:30 AM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Attaaaack Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatch!!!!! XD)
To: reaganaut1
next will be terror suspects and Somali pirates.
you can’t discriminate against midnight naval property acquisition specialists.
4 posted on
09/26/2011 11:34:48 AM PDT by
WOBBLY BOB
(See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
To: reaganaut1
Every time I see this proposal I am struck at just how d*mn dumb it is. You might as well title it the “If you aren’t employed now you never will be again” Bill.
No Business is going to risk interviewing ANY unemployed person for any position.
5 posted on
09/26/2011 11:35:25 AM PDT by
The Working Man
(The mantra for BO's reign...."No Child Left a Dime")
To: reaganaut1
My guess is that Obama could not even DEFINE “free enterprise.”
6 posted on
09/26/2011 11:37:19 AM PDT by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: reaganaut1
Hey, I’m unemployed, well actually retired, but UNEMPLOYED. Does this mean that I am now a “protected class”? Oh goody. What do I get? Trips like on Wheel of Fortune?
7 posted on
09/26/2011 11:38:14 AM PDT by
mc5cents
To: reaganaut1
The only people in America that do NOT belong to an Obama “Protected Class” are native-born, employed, non-obese, non-union, straight, White males.
8 posted on
09/26/2011 11:38:32 AM PDT by
MindBender26
(Forget AMEX. Remember your Glock 27: Never Leave Home Without It!)
To: reaganaut1
First scare the heck out of businesses and discourage hiring, then extend unemployment insurance to two years to increase long-term unemployment, and finally make it easy to sue businesses for allegedly excluding the unemployed.
Well sure, when you put it like that it looks bad. But, The Won says these items are not related in any way and you should just go on about your day.
9 posted on
09/26/2011 11:38:42 AM PDT by
ExTxMarine
(PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
To: reaganaut1
Boy, that is just frecking brilliant! Make the Unemployed “protected”. Then companies can be sued for not hiring the unemployed. Yeah, that’ll make companies want to stay in the US and invest. [/s]
Really, his agenda is to turn us into a bunch of mind-numbed, lazy bastards—totally dependent on the Government for handouts.
10 posted on
09/26/2011 11:38:51 AM PDT by
rbg81
To: reaganaut1
Are businesses now prohibited from asking for a résumé?
11 posted on
09/26/2011 11:39:01 AM PDT by
southernnorthcarolina
("Better be wise by the misfortunes of others than by your own." -- Aesop)
To: reaganaut1
12 posted on
09/26/2011 11:39:01 AM PDT by
lowbridge
(Rep. Dingell: "Its taken a long time.....to control the people.")
To: reaganaut1
Mo money for reparations. Mo money for bums. Mo money for lawyers.
Insanity continues with Obozo at the helm
13 posted on
09/26/2011 11:39:29 AM PDT by
Gasshog
(going to get what all those libs asked for, but its not what they expected.)
To: reaganaut1
I am thoroughly disgusted with him and his bunch of thugs and thieves.
14 posted on
09/26/2011 11:40:05 AM PDT by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
To: reaganaut1
Obama is in a mad rush to destroy the US before January 20, 2013.
15 posted on
09/26/2011 11:40:30 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: reaganaut1
Unsuccessful job applicants could sue and recover damages for violations, just like when an employer discriminates on the basis of a persons race, color, religion, sex or national origin. It's like this guy lies awake at night thinking of ways to screw the private sector. It's one thing after the next.
17 posted on
09/26/2011 11:41:40 AM PDT by
AAABEST
(Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
To: reaganaut1
But he thinks he has found a way to pry open doors in the workplace for many of the unemployed, especially those who have been out of work for a long time. And yet, by constantly extending unemployment benefits, government provides ever greater positive incentives for those who have lost their jobs to remain unemployed for ever longer periods of time.
As a number of economists have shown, when unemployment benefits are extended, someone who has lost a job -- e.g., an engineer -- is further incentivized to remain unemployed until he has found another engineering job. That job might not actually exist. What the economy -- and the unemployed engineer, by the way -- really needs, however, is simply for the unemployed engineer to get off the public dole system and to start pulling his own weight. That might require that he accept a less-than-ideal job, perhaps on a production line somewhere.
18 posted on
09/26/2011 11:42:24 AM PDT by
GoodDay
(Palin for POTUS 2012)
To: reaganaut1
Seems like everyone is a “Protected Status” citizen, except for the people who make this country work ...
20 posted on
09/26/2011 11:43:50 AM PDT by
Hodar
( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
To: reaganaut1
He must be thinking about his next job.
21 posted on
09/26/2011 11:45:16 AM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: reaganaut1
Relatively few long-term unemployed have been diligently and energetically seeking employment during the whole time. Most have gone on “funemployment” for a while, and afterward, or perhaps when the benefits were drying up, decided to seriously pursue a new position.
This is just my opinion, as formed from numerous news stories. YMMV.
22 posted on
09/26/2011 11:45:35 AM PDT by
MortMan
(What disease did cured ham used to have?)
To: reaganaut1
The reason businesses like to hire people who are already employed is the same reason women like to date men already in a relationship.
Should Uncle 0bamao make THAT illegal discrimination also?
26 posted on
09/26/2011 11:47:42 AM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson