Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!
Jim Robinson

Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 50mmisasackofshit; 50mmisgay; bugzapper; darkwing104isapos; darkwing104isgay; homosexualagenda; romney; romneysucks; undeadthread; vanity; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980 ... 3,181-3,197 next last
To: who knows what evil?
Well, being that I LIVE in New Hampshire, I think it's pretty safe to say that the vast majority of residents do NOT support gay marriage/civil unions, nor the repeal of DADT.

A few pieces of evidence, if I may:

--The legislature which passed this was a Dem majority, as was the state Senate. Since that time, the Legislature has gone from a (appx.) 250-150 Dem majority to a 297-103 GOP majority. Likewise, the state Senate went from a 14-10 Dem majority to a 19-5 GOP majority.

--Gay marriage was NEVER placed on a referendum. The people never got to decide.

--The incoming House leadership has repeal of the gay marriage law on their 2011 agenda (along with spending cuts, tax limitations, etc.)

--Here in NH, there was an Episcopalian diocese who allowed gays/gay marriages in the congregation. Within a year, that congregation dropped by over 50 percent.

--No poll has been taken by any reputable organization which shows the majority of NH resident support gay marriage. Ever.

Please, don't lump me with the "homosexual agenda" simply because I don't parrot your line or those of the more ignorant on this board.
941 posted on 12/19/2010 8:46:32 AM PST by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 934 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Roy Masters issues final warning to America, Tues/Wed 14-15 Apr 2009) Marxian Opiates Redefined

American liberals haven’t quite convinced the American public to abandon the capitalist system for rule by an oligarchy of socialist elites. To advance their cause, liberals employ opiates. The attack on capitalism using opiates to diminish free will and abandon moral responsibility.

Capitalism without morality is no better than socialism. Liberal attacks on religion serve two purposes. The first is to bring about amoral capitalism that will be rejected and self-destruct, as it should. The second purpose is to remove any obstacle to the absolutist rule of the socialist elite by eliminating the idea that a higher moral authority might exist. The elite will determine what is right or wrong, good or bad and we will obediently follow since there is no higher moral authority.

The welfare state is an opiate. The recipients receive their fixes in exchange for political support. It may not be paradise, but it sure beats working, saving and having to struggle for a living, at least for those whose greatest aspiration is to not miss their favorite television talk-show host or win the lottery.

The most powerful opiate on the liberal menu is sex. It is highly addictive and produces exactly the stupor needed to sedate the public. It costs nothing, is readily available, and to a large extent can be made consequent free. Sex sells and that message has never been lost on liberal politicians. Under the guise of “sexual freedom”, “reproductive rights” and the “right to privacy”, the gullible are buying it wholesale.

The destruction of the family is of little concern to socialists. The states opportunity to shape young minds is enhanced by dysfunctional families. The socialist elite are addicted to control and families are just a nuisance competing for obedience. Loyalty to the socialist state must be paramount and not impeded by a misguided sense of family.

Drugs, sex, a welfare check and other government “gifts” are a means to an end. Why bow to a God that would deprive you of these carnal pleasures and a life of ease when you can elect a politician that guarantees them? Why struggle with concepts of right and wrong when the government can do that for you? Why burden yourself with responsibilities the government will gladly assume? Why not just swallow the liberal opiates and accept life in a stupor? www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2229411/posts

942 posted on 12/19/2010 8:46:38 AM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lovebloggers

Go to hell!


943 posted on 12/19/2010 8:47:14 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 844 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
What is the difference between this JimRob edict and what Fred Phelps says?

You are comparing JimRob to Fred Phelps who pickets military funerals? Did you bump your head before you wrote that?

944 posted on 12/19/2010 8:47:25 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (YOU BETCHA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 807 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

Excellent retort!!


945 posted on 12/19/2010 8:48:31 AM PST by evad (SHUT IT DOWN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies]

To: Lovebloggers

I have a lot of respect for self zotters. See ya.


946 posted on 12/19/2010 8:48:45 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 844 | View Replies]

To: trisham
If you disagree with Jim's position, perhaps you should take it up with him directly, instead of skulking around the thread firing potshots.

I don't disagree with Jim's position. I just think it was poorly expressed.
947 posted on 12/19/2010 8:48:53 AM PST by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99

Please go to another website and post your drivel there! We care nothing about your gay agenda loving opinion.


948 posted on 12/19/2010 8:49:25 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: Lovebloggers

Bye!


949 posted on 12/19/2010 8:50:07 AM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR to pimp your blog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 844 | View Replies]

To: central_va
What compelled you to post that diatribe on a thread like this? What else are you confused about?

I am opposed to the repeal of DADT. I think that is part of the homosexual agenda. I also believe the gay marriage thing is too, and I oppose that as well. I am not vehemently opposed to homosexuals, however. I am just trying to see if I still fit here. Maybe I need a list of what is included in the "Homosexual Agenda".

950 posted on 12/19/2010 8:50:07 AM PST by Paradox (Palin, the female Rush. I wish she would stay that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 931 | View Replies]

To: manc

You got it!


951 posted on 12/19/2010 8:51:57 AM PST by humblegunner (Blogger Overlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies]

To: Lovebloggers
What a bunch of chumps. “Zot” me infants.

Personally, I'd whack you just for your handle alone.

952 posted on 12/19/2010 8:54:22 AM PST by humblegunner (Blogger Overlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 844 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
"Homosexual Agenda".

To understand the agenda you first must understand the difference between "tolerance" and "acceptance". The agenda is to convince the average person that buggery is not only normal and acceptable it is even commendable. I mean this in a cultural context.

Personally, I believe in limited tolerance of this most despicable of behaviors. No special treatment but with severe social limits.

953 posted on 12/19/2010 8:56:50 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 950 | View Replies]

Comment #954 Removed by Moderator

To: Antoninus

I’d call them sell outs too and IMHO it’;s high time the likes of hannity and his cowardly pals got a message that the homosexual and killing babies is just as conservative as the budget which he likes to harp on about all the time like a broken record and as for his guest YAWN.

They are happy to take the conservative cause to make a show but only will talk about certain aspects of the left’s agenda.
Hannity and others could damage the homosexual agenda with just showing one video of them at the folsom fair or have videos of them lurking at dog parks, etc

I’ve turned him off as I have with many of these so called talk show hosts and TV hosts.
Those who say I have a friend and they’re a homosexual need to wake the hell too.


955 posted on 12/19/2010 8:57:26 AM PST by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
I don't disagree with Jim's position. I just think it was poorly expressed.

*********************************

Feel free to expound on that. I'm sure that your refinement of his statement would be much appreciated. Perhaps you should ping him so that he may learn from you. You wouldn't want to leave him out, would you?

956 posted on 12/19/2010 8:58:38 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 947 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
A lot of 'if wishes were fishes' baloney in your post. A poll taken by UNH back in 2009 indicated that NH residents supported gay marriage by 55 - 39%...of course; you are free to state that poll isn't credible due to its source. You can say that about any poll. As for the new GOP majority? Republicans that support the likes of Gregg, Collins, Snowe, Brown? Those kind of Republicans? So repeal is on the agenda? When it is a 'done deal', then you can crow about it. Until then...speculation. By the way...I didn't lump you in with any 'pro homosexual agenda'...don't be so 'touchy'. As far as ignorant goes...my in-laws were all born in NH, and they aren't opposed to 'gay marriage'...my wife is the only exception. I don't believe that the opinion of someone who relocated to NH from California carries any more weight than those people who were actually born here. You believe a majority of NH residents oppose 'gay marriage' and the repeal of 'DADT'; I don't.

We'll just have to 'agree to disagree' on that one.

957 posted on 12/19/2010 8:59:12 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 941 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
"I thought DADT was a pretty good compromise actually...I _think_ I am opposed to the "homosexual agenda", just not really sure what that is..."

Paradox, I have the perfect explanation for you. The Homosexual Agenda is Journolister, Bobo Worshipper, and laughably lame anti-FReeper David Corn immediately tweeting after the DADT vote:

DavidCornDC: "Make War, Not Marriage: It's now okay for a gay American to kill overseas, but not to love and marry at home."

It wasn't just good enough for the Homosexual Agenda to replace recruitment with recruitment; but of course it was all just a feint for the main course, which is universal homosexual marriage.

958 posted on 12/19/2010 8:59:36 AM PST by StAnDeliver (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 926 | View Replies]

To: central_va

here;s the problem today with them.
They are told tat they’re OK, that it’s OK to be poking hairy arses or told that it’s OK for women to wear straps on’s pretending to be a man while she has a woman bent over.

Instead they need to be told that they need help that they have a mental sickness that even if they do not believe in God then nature did build our bodies in a certain ways and our bodies are designed to carry on our species .

What is disgusting is that they now want to get into people’s face, brain wash kids and if the media actually did their job and reported on their agenda, teaching fisting in schools, lurking at public bathrooms, diseases then people will or might wake the hell up including those idiots who say I have a queer friend.


959 posted on 12/19/2010 9:01:09 AM PST by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 953 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

I knew you didn’t catch it, he’s trying to push the usual pervert crap under the radar.


960 posted on 12/19/2010 9:02:07 AM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 832 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980 ... 3,181-3,197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson