Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
The way I understood it was if they wanted to fight and kill the enemy, they could. It is they recreational activities that they could not openly practice.
I’m glad you pointed out that homosexuals already have the same rights as heterosexuals, because the leftist homosexuals have run away with this lie for long enough.
Heterosexuals are limited in whom they can choose to marry. They can only marry someone who is legally eligible of the opposite sex.
Homosexuals are free to marry anyone they want, within this same limitation.
But that is not enough for the homosexuals.
In addition to being able to marry anyone who is legally eligible of the opposite sex, THEY WANT THE ADDITIONAL AND SPECIAL RIGHT TO MARRY SOMEONE OF THE SAME SEX.
THIS is not justice and equality. This is special treatment. And our Constitution does not guarantee special treatment of anyone, especially gender-preference.
I looked at his profile and saw that he lives in the same county I do. I was just curious how he came to know thousands of gays (actually he called them fags), so I asked a more direct question, laced with my version of humor.
Even he he responded "None of your business." that would be an answer.
But since you don't liked the way I asked him, maybe you can ask him or answer for him?
************************************
I have no problem with what he called them. Why do you?
I don't have any interest in admonishing the poster for what he said. Why do you?
I have never seen a bigger bunch of suck ups in my life. Jim has lost his mind. He has turned this site into the DU.
By the way, I could give a flying fig about the “queer” issue (who talks like that anymore — how old are all of you?). The laughable part of this entire 800+ post thread of embarrassment is the fact that you actually believe that you are defending freedom of speech.
What a bunch of chumps. “Zot” me infants. [rolling eyes]
If you think that we on this forum are so bad, why are you here? It is always better to leave than to feel unwanted.
Some posters seem to require multiple zottings. :)
Actually, I think Jim wants to zot the suck ups, if you know what I mean.
And if you want to support dividing the American people into groups with dissimilar rights then perhaps you *are* on the wrong forum and should leave by desire or by zot.
Central va views everyone with a potential for promoting a homosexual agenda...he's tried to get several posters zotted, it's his hobby.
Unless you openly and often gay bash you are not doing your part in his eyes
Imho, many of those who believe that this issue is not important simply have no idea of what is really at stake. They’re well-meaning people who just don’t know what the impact of that attitude results in, which you and your family unfortunately experienced.
Jim hasn’t lost his mind. There are several posters who constantly run to him to beg him to get rid of others. He is just clearing the air, again.
Heh, heh... You said “cheeky”. Heh, heh.
Just barely “honest”.
Yes, the military DOES discriminate but what you are describing is “reasonable” discrimination just like a bus company may discriminate against hiring the blind as bus drivers. However, it is not “reasonable” discrimination to not hire someone because their skin color, gender, or because they like to have sex of someone of the same gender. There is nothing “reasonable” that prevents homosexuals from fighting for our country.
********************************
Right. Because you can't.
LOL! Perhaps the most annoying thing on FR right now.
I'm with you, Albion!
No, I didn’t make that connection between Robinson and Phelps. I know that Robinson loves and respects the military.
However, Robinson is wrong about equating “pro-homosexuality” (which really I am not) with anti-constitution. I have read the Constitution, The Bill of Rights, The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers. I saw nothing about homosexuals in there. Are homosexuality and the Constitution mutually exclusive? What is the Constitutional source of this idea?
From here on out it will be you don't you know.
I’m currently compiling a list of everyone who has expressed interest.
About a quarter of the way through it occurred to me it might
also be useful to sort by state.
Working on it, will keep y’all posted.
Indeed. I look forward to seeing whether any Republicans seeking national office will openly say "I will fight to repeal this" or whether they will equivocate.
I do not think it acceptable for someone to dress in leather outfits, slap their fellow soldier on the ass, and shout “oh behave!” I don’t think that the repeal of DADT allows that. It will allow people to not hide who they are. Wouldn’t like to know who to avoid if that is what you want?
Military discipline will always be military discipline.
How do you feel about integration of white and black soldiers in the armed forces? Is that also government experimenting?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.