Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dixiechick2000

No, I didn’t make that connection between Robinson and Phelps. I know that Robinson loves and respects the military.

However, Robinson is wrong about equating “pro-homosexuality” (which really I am not) with anti-constitution. I have read the Constitution, The Bill of Rights, The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers. I saw nothing about homosexuals in there. Are homosexuality and the Constitution mutually exclusive? What is the Constitutional source of this idea?


856 posted on 12/19/2010 6:46:12 AM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (I am defiant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 817 | View Replies ]


To: Big Guy and Rusty 99

“I have read the Constitution, The Bill of Rights, The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers. I saw nothing about homosexuals in there.”

And in this ONE sentence, you have completely made Jim’s point. The really sad thing is that you don’t even understand it yourself.


1,173 posted on 12/19/2010 11:53:49 AM PST by MestaMachine (islam - Hostis hvmani generis - Enemy of the human race)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies ]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99; Jim Robinson

Yes...you did make the connection between JR and Phelps. Maybe you did so in a heated moment. We’ve all had those.

I hope you will apologize to him.

I don’t think as much about the constitution in military matters...the military is not a democracy nor is it a republic...as much as I think about the cohesiveness of each unit, especially during wartime. I’ve never served, but my husband did. He doesn’t think it’s a good idea.


1,609 posted on 12/19/2010 11:51:24 PM PST by dixiechick2000 ("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson