If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!

Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!

[Wile E Coyote Genius]

“The gay crowd doesn’t give a damn about duty and honor. They just want to flagrantly disrupt good order and discipline.”

I believe you have a point here! Does the army still have “blanket parties”?

[Red Steel]

You’re welcome.

[Antoninus]

Hannity and others never talked about this bill at all and actually hardly if ever talk about the agenda.

Yawn Vanity and others will NEVER side with us in this issue because they serve at the pleasure of the homo-friendly elite media. They like their jobs and their cash flow too much to defy their masters.

I would call them sell outs.

[hiredhand]

I've said many times, and will continue to say that homosexuals aren't bad because they're homosexual. They're homosexual because they're BAD.

Everybody is fallen, and even those with the very presence of God with them can "slip", but homosexuals have taken their brand of sin to a high level of perfection. They not only want what they want in order to please themselves, but they've politicized it and packaged it into something that on the surface might even seem acceptable, if not for the scene you describe on the beach, and other things. They're certainly no minority as we understand the definition of minority, and they're not legally owed any special allowances by our Constitution.

The truth of the matter is that they're miserable people. Since homosexuality is simply another symptom of their overall problem, they suffer the results of a myriad of other problems. Domestic violence in homosexual households is high, as is the rate of child abuse among them. Ditto for substance abuse and just about every other kind of abuse you can name. Because of my job I work in close proximity to the law enforcement community in my state and domestic violence problems in homosexual and lesbian households are almost expected. I've been told that it's the exception to find a homosexual couple that's not just nasty and aggressive in some way, shape, or form. My wife is a BSN/RN and hears regularly from EMTs and ER folks that she knows who receive homosexuals to remove "toys" from places where they were shoved and then got stuck. Moreover this, she tells me they act as if they did nothing wrong. Or she tells me of instances where one simply beat the other badly enough for a hospitalization.

As I said, they package this darkness in a manner which makes them seem like nice and normal people. But when you get down to it, they're just messed up people who are not only nasty, but aggressive about it. Without The Lord, we all have the potential to be what they are.

It's no wonder that God in the Tanakh demanded that Israel slaughter entire nations for things like what we're talking about...and while that wasn't the entire reason, many of those nations DID have some disgusting sexual practices...some even rooted in their form of religion. But the bottom line then, as it is now, is that it's still disgusting, it still spreads disease, and it's still just a symptom of a larger and worse problem.

But hey...what do I know. According to the American Psychiatric Association, NAMBLA, NPR, the DNC, the NEA, and other experts it's just an alternative lifestyle and we should simply accept it... even coexist with it.

I'm waiting for hell to freeze over first!

[Syncro]

They still have the anti-sodomy rule in the UCMJ.

Good to know, I thought so.

You can bet the PTB will be rushing to yank it out.

They must be stopped!

If it stays in, this will put a real monkey wrench in their plans.

[Victoria Delsoul]

The traitors supporting DADT on our side of the aisle must be TEA Party'd out and I don't care if they're replaced by democrats.

Here is the list:

Mark Kirk of Illinois.  The 3 bitches: Murkowski, Snowe, and Collins. Voinovich, Scott Brown. The so-called conservative of Nevada, John Ensign, and Richard Burr.

[vox_freedom]

Everything seems flat now, I am not interested Christmas, sports or anything. All I can think of is Free Republic and fighting these bastards. God Bless Free Republic.

The vast majority of posters here agree with you, including me. Since this thread is about what the owner of FreeRepublic believes and will tolerate on his website, I now wonder about those FReepers who disagree with the sentiments JimRob has expressed (in #1). A few of these FRINO's (FReepers in Name Only) have risen to the bait on this thread and gotten the zot. For that we should all be grateful.

You and I know multiple of these FRINO posters, who have been contentious, baiting, and combative when they show up to post in a "hit and run" fashion, then run and hide when confronted. Some of them have been around for a decade or more. You know who I mean -- and by the way, they haven't shown up on this thread either. One of them recently posted that I "had my head up my a**" as he was challenged about his position on DADT -- and nothing happened to that post or to them.

Not only is a purge desperately needed in Congress, but also here on FreeRepublic.

The result of complacency by the electorate is what we have witnessed in this lame duck session of Congress. We simply cannot rest until our voices of common sense and decency are heard and our enemies, both foreign and domestic are defeated.

[onyx]

The so-called conservative of Nevada, John Ensign, and Richard Burr.

I knew about the other six, and heard the names Ensign and Burr mentioned, but did not know they voted for it, too!

OUT WITH THEM!

THIS VOTE IS UNCONSCIONABLE.

[Katarina]

It makes me sick to my stomach. It is going to go from bad to worse.

[Victoria Delsoul]

For sure, and totally disgusting.

[Windflier]

Am I the only one who remembers all the threads a year ago when we were being assured that Scott Brown was a genuine "conservative"? In fact, I distinctly recall reading that he was downright "presidential."

No, you're not the only one who remembers that disgusting bout of undeserved infatuation on FR.

I didn't know a whole lot about Scott Brown at the time, and was glad that anyone who called themselves a Republican was giving a serious challenge to the slimy lib, Martha Coakley, but when folks started saying, "Scott Brown for president!", I just about lost it.

I see the same thing happening now with John Bolton and Herman Cain. I just wish folks would check their enthusiasm until they've actually vetted a politician enough to know who they really are. As time has shown, Scott Brown is no conservative. That should be a strong lesson for our side.

[Windflier]

...it repulses me that the top commanders of the different military branches approve of gays serving. It just proves that the highest in command are nothing but uniform-wearing civilian politicians kissing butt.

That's precisely why my dad chose to leave the military after he made LtCol. He told me once, that the higher he went in rank, the more the job had to do with politics, and the less it had to do with soldiering.

[Cedar]

Thanks, Jim. That’s why FR is the best!

[onyx]

Here's the traitorous weenie Ensign's statement:

Before the vote, Ensign said the choice for him was a struggle between what he personally thought was the right thing to do, and the circumstantial concerns of various military chiefs.

That’s why, he explained, he had voted against taking up the measure.

But in the end, once the question on the table, it appeared personal conviction won out over political circumstance. “My personal feeling is that it should be repealed,” he’d said before the 65-to-31 vote.

Ensign left the Senate chamber quickly and quietly . . .

- - - - - - - -

HIS *personal* FEELING?

[b_sharp]

I think Jimbo’s other boot is dirty, you better start licking.

Having gays admit the fact isn’t going to do a damn thing to the military or FR.

[GregH]

Well said Jim.

This is not about equal rights as Gays already have the same rights as every other American citizen!

This is about extra rights, forcing others to subject to their agenda and destroying institutions like ther military in America.

You are absolutely right in zotting those who push the gay agenda in this site.

[The Cajun]

Ensign left the Senate chamber quickly and quietly

Don't sound like a ?man? too proud of himself.

[jessduntno]

“I think Jimbo’s other boot is dirty, you better start licking.”

Aren’t you a nasty bit of work.

“Having gays admit the fact isn’t going to do a damn thing to the military or FR.”

And you know this how?

[Victoria Delsoul]

Ha! He wants to have it both ways, what a weasel!

Gotta go now. I'm playing tennis tomorrow.

Nighty night, dear Onyx - see ya tomorrow.

[jessduntno]

“Don’t sound like a ?man? too proud of himself.”

Doesn’t sound like a man. When you do something like this, you should stay and take the lumps. Or give some out. Not slink out.