Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!
Jim Robinson

Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 50mmisasackofshit; 50mmisgay; bugzapper; darkwing104isapos; darkwing104isgay; homosexualagenda; romney; romneysucks; undeadthread; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 3,181-3,197 next last

bump!


861 posted on 12/19/2010 6:55:04 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 859 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99

That question is proof no expanation will make you understand


862 posted on 12/19/2010 6:55:08 AM PST by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 807 | View Replies]

To: Stiletto
It's about standing up for morality. And for the record, no civilization has ever survived when they become an "immoral and wicked" nation that oppresses the moral and righteous.

People like you, if you are indeed gay, are going to cause the downfall of this once great nation.

863 posted on 12/19/2010 6:56:10 AM PST by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
Oh well. Looks like I won’t get a zot for Christmas.

And who would've thunk it! Wow.

864 posted on 12/19/2010 6:56:28 AM PST by Ron H. (Impeach Kenyan Hussein Obama!!! He is Americas Conservative public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
First of all, there is no such thing as mortal sin - that's a man made teaching and not biblical.

"There is sin that is mortal; I do not say that you should pray about that. All wrongdoing is sin; but there is sin that is not mortal" - 1 John 5:16-17
865 posted on 12/19/2010 7:02:53 AM PST by Hilda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
There is nothing “reasonable” that prevents homosexuals from fighting for our country.

You are a sick pervert.

866 posted on 12/19/2010 7:03:40 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
First of all, there is no such thing as mortal sin - that's a man made teaching and not biblical.

Sorry, the idea of Mortal Sin comes from being a Catholic. (You know, the original Church?) It is a concept going back to middle ages.

And since that's not biblical it's no wonder you're cluelessness about Jesus. Jesus had NO problem calling evil, evil! He told them to sin no more and he turned away from others because he knew they wouldn't accept HIM. The homos continue w/their lifestyle with an 'up yours' attitude. The same attitude I see you giving Jim.

Can you show me where in the Bible it says to mock those who sin? I don't know who you worship, but it isn't Jesus. Jesus may have called out sinners, he didn't call them names.

Your post was repulsive and I didn't read it all - just enough to make me gag!

Well, I would hate to make you think. Enjoy your narrow circus of orthodoxy, it is the intellectual equivalent of inbreeding.

867 posted on 12/19/2010 7:15:11 AM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (I am defiant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

thanks Jim,

I appreciate your willingness to say no and boot them off FR to people whom support something that is not normal. Just because 25 other countries chose to support homosexuality in the armed forces, does it mean the US has to do it also. For the love of God, it is an unhloy alliance for man to love another man and a woman to love another woman in a sexual sense. Get real america- this is how to kill a country.

here are few of the 25 countries - Canada, Great britian, Australia, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Estonia, Israel, Hungary. This is a sad testimony to the liberalization of a country. China and the Soviet Union will increase in power and dominance whil America falls into a dung heap of stupidity. Look at the stupidity of the people whom voted for this line of dung. Yes, Scott Brown a former JAG, what a wuss. Burr, another one lacking the cahhones to do anything. 8 republicans broke the ranks

I like this quote from John F. Kennedy-
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preserveration of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life.

I served for this Great Country in Lebanon 1983. It took a coward to blow up the barracks.

Oddly enough it takes the cowards in DC to vote for something that they have no idea about. Carl Levin D-MI endorses this piece of crap. To all FR in MI get out recall petitions to begin a referndum to rid MI of this parasite once and for all.


868 posted on 12/19/2010 7:16:24 AM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
What he's saying is that there is no active policy to weed out homosexuals under DADT. Newsflash--gays/lesbians have been serving long before I joined, and served long after I got out. (I served under both "Ask" and DADT.)

My issue is not a lifestyle issue, per se--it's issues of readiness and good order/discipline. Open homosexuals in the ranks will degrade both. DADT wasn't perfect, but at least it recognized the reality that homosexuals who wanted to serve were going to, one way or another, and at least THAT policy had the effect of keeping a lid on one's sexuality.

If you disagree, fine--flame away.
869 posted on 12/19/2010 7:18:33 AM PST by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

Comment #870 Removed by Moderator

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99

Dude, while I agree that the language can at times be a little wrong, you are way over the top and incorrect in your assessment of the DADT issue.

With DADT, homosexuals can serve in the military, they just can’t ‘openly’ serve- in other words, they must conform to military standards- they aren’t black, white, pink, yellow, gay, or straight- they are all green. They can’t go around ‘telling’ (ie promoting) what the do any more than someone who may believe in Rastafarianism could openly promote smoking weed in the military. Their belief doesn’t change, it is their action in openly promoting something.

The repeal allows, if not encourages one group to use the military for activism by openly promoting a lifestyle or political point of view. This is something not afforded any other group in the military.

Everyone here has different views on this issue for different reasons, for myself, it is simply about what I stated. The military isn’t about promotion of any lifestyle or political point, it is about killing the enemy. DADT kept it to that. If you kill the enemy and don’t use the military as a platform to promote X view, you can stay. As soon as you start ‘telling’- ie using the military to promote your view, you are out. The same can be said about a lot of lifestyles and beliefs in the military.


871 posted on 12/19/2010 7:22:50 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 786 | View Replies]

To: trisham
many of those who believe that this issue is not important simply have no idea of what is really at stake

The real issue is not whether an occasional random Freeper believes it's not important, but whether a sufficient number of the American electorate believes that way.

Whether or not there is a debate on FR, there must be a debate in America at large if yesterday's action is to be reversed.

872 posted on 12/19/2010 7:24:05 AM PST by Notary Sojac (I've been ionized, but I'm okay now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 849 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I haven’t seen support for the homosexual agenda from anyone who served or intends to. Basically, it’s non participants telling others how to live, a common attribute of liberal policies.


873 posted on 12/19/2010 7:24:11 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99

...”There is nothing “reasonable” that prevents homosexuals from fighting for our country.” -rusty

*******

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE DSM

The DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) is the most widely used diagnostic reference book utilized by mental health professionals in the United States.

It’s a manual by which all diagnostic codes are derived for diagnosis and treatment - every single physician (an estimated 850,000*) in the United States refers to this book in order to code for a diagnosis. In plain English, what does this mean? It means that for over 30 years physicians have been prevented from properly diagnosing homosexuality as an aberrant behavior and thus, cannot, recommend a course of treatment for these individuals.

Prior to that time, homosexuality had been treated as a mental disorder under section “302. Sexual Deviations” in the DSM-II. Section 302 said, in part: “This category is for individuals whose sexual interests are directed primarily toward objects other than people of the opposite sex, toward sexual acts … performed under bizarre circumstances. … Even though many find their practices distasteful, they remain unable to substitute normal sexual behavior for them.” Homosexuality was listed as the first sexual deviation under 302. Once that diagnostic code for homosexuality was removed, physicians, including psychiatrists, have been prevented from diagnosing homosexuality as a mental disorder for more than three decades.


874 posted on 12/19/2010 7:27:13 AM PST by WVKayaker (Faith makes the discords of the present become the harmonies of the future - Robert Collyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

1)There is a huge difference between “allowing” and “forcing”. The Constitution allows blacks to go to schools which were once considered to be whites only. Radical courts forced busing in the 1970’s.

2)With all due respect, homosexualism is not word. I think you mean homosexuality. Your malapropism doesn’t make us look any smarter. Next, you will be complaining about the “off-the-dock Jews” or the “UFO-CIA”

3) If you eliminate everyone who doesn’t agree 100%, you narrow our power and our free flowing exchange of ideas. It is intellectual inbreeding, which reduces Free Republic to the backwoods kissing cousins areas of New Hampshire. Is this what you want?


875 posted on 12/19/2010 7:29:58 AM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (I am defiant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 823 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
New Hampshire?


876 posted on 12/19/2010 7:34:49 AM PST by WVKayaker (Faith makes the discords of the present become the harmonies of the future - Robert Collyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: Impy

I wasn’t mocking him. I was stating a fact. If I really wanted to mock him, I’d say I’m going for a walk. If he feels that I was mocking his disability, I wholeheartedly apologize.


877 posted on 12/19/2010 7:35:05 AM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (I am defiant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 827 | View Replies]

Comment #878 Removed by Moderator

To: WVKayaker

Says the West Virginia poster. ‘Nuff said.


879 posted on 12/19/2010 7:39:16 AM PST by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99

Rusty - well written, thanks.


880 posted on 12/19/2010 7:40:18 AM PST by maineman (BC EAGLES FAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 3,181-3,197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson