Skip to comments.If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!
Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
President Reagan would have none of this!
Tea Party supported, FReeper supported, Sen. Scott
Brown ... who’s been and perhaps still IS in the
Reserves .. really hurt himself with this vote and
with our side.
I called his DC office (no live person), and left
a message today telling him just that, and that he’s
apparently forgotten how and what got him where he
is .. those hundreds of thousands of Americans who
donated millions across the country for the reasonable
positions from him he promised.
I ended with letting him know that his vote will be
remembered next election.
He, of all people, knows the truth, and flipped off
the welfare of the troops over support from his MA
Sickening. Good lesson.
The 2010 election marks the rise of a new political committee, dubbed "super PACs," and officially known as "independent-expenditure only committees," which can raise unlimited sums from corporations, unions and other groups, as well as wealthy individuals.  The super PACs were made possible by two court rulings, including one early this year by the Supreme Court, that lifted many spending and contribution limits. The groups can also mount the kind of direct attacks on candidates that were not allowed in the past.  Super PACs are not allowed to coordinate directly with candidates or political parties and must disclose their donors."
And from the SCOTUS Citizen United case:
"Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the majority in Citizens United, said that independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption. "
Good thing McCain/Feingold was eviscerated. :-)
Yeah, I’m getting back to the pissed off mode....just needed a recharge.
He kicked us in the shin, he didnt stab us in the back.
He kicked us in the shin, he didnt stab us in the back.
This one, I think, is more likely to be corrosive than immediately catastrophic. It isn't gays who have just been empowered within the military, it's aggressive social activists, and that is a real problem. People are focusing on buggery in the ranks - a little too much, IMHO, because I've read some stuff that's pretty insulting to present service members - but I think the more likely result will be a tendency toward a politicized, even a unionized, military, with all the problems such militaries have already encountered in the EU.
We lost this one. Time to redouble our efforts.
IF you are NOT pro GAY agenda what is there to 'chat' about, 'you know' what is said about opinions?
You make no sense.
I guess my account needs to be deleted, then. Apparently it’s no longer enough to be a fiscal conservative and suspicious of big government. No, siree... NOWADAYS you have to full-on 100% subscribe to each and every “conservative” issue or you’re deemed not conservative enough and purged in a manner that can only be described as “Stalin-esque”.
No political group in history has succeeded by purging itself of moderates.
Good for you STARWISE. It was people from accross this great country of ours financing his campaign. If he forgets that then he forget about getting any more donations from people like me that don’t live there.
Well said Jim, I wholeheartedly agree!
What else is there to say? I guess we both agree on the main point.
This decision is so destructive it’s unreal.
I’ve never been in the military but I have lived in close quarters (boarding school) and have had the misfortune of lesbos hitting on me...and worse. You want to hear something disgusting? Here I was at 15 taking a shower in a group shower setting and a lesbo (who’d been hitting on me for months) came in and started taking pictures of me. Before I could get to her, her own roommate jumped her, grabbed the camera and pulled all the film out, exposing & destroying it, and then she smashed the camera on the wet floor of the shower area. I had also had almost all of my underwear stolen from the dorm laundry room, and yep, you guessed it, the lesbo’s roommate later told me that the lesbo had taken them.
I currently belong to an athletic club, and have had issues with dykes in there in the locker room: brushing against me for no damn good reason because there’s more than enough room to pass, checking me out in very obvious ways, one pretending to be texting but I think was taking my pic (fully clothed thank God) by the way she was holding her phone etc.
I hesitated in sharing the above because it is quite personal but for some reason decided it should be shared.
Now I’m picturing this kind of stuff being foisted on our military members against their will and I want to vomit like there’s no tomorrow.
MOOOOlah neither did your whine about wanting to talk about the queer agenda, IF you are supposedly against making it official and protected activity.
The good news is your problem with FR is solved.
I agree with you Jim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.