Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
bump!
That question is proof no expanation will make you understand
People like you, if you are indeed gay, are going to cause the downfall of this once great nation.
And who would've thunk it! Wow.
You are a sick pervert.
Sorry, the idea of Mortal Sin comes from being a Catholic. (You know, the original Church?) It is a concept going back to middle ages.
And since that's not biblical it's no wonder you're cluelessness about Jesus. Jesus had NO problem calling evil, evil! He told them to sin no more and he turned away from others because he knew they wouldn't accept HIM. The homos continue w/their lifestyle with an 'up yours' attitude. The same attitude I see you giving Jim.
Can you show me where in the Bible it says to mock those who sin? I don't know who you worship, but it isn't Jesus. Jesus may have called out sinners, he didn't call them names.
Your post was repulsive and I didn't read it all - just enough to make me gag!
Well, I would hate to make you think. Enjoy your narrow circus of orthodoxy, it is the intellectual equivalent of inbreeding.
thanks Jim,
I appreciate your willingness to say no and boot them off FR to people whom support something that is not normal. Just because 25 other countries chose to support homosexuality in the armed forces, does it mean the US has to do it also. For the love of God, it is an unhloy alliance for man to love another man and a woman to love another woman in a sexual sense. Get real america- this is how to kill a country.
here are few of the 25 countries - Canada, Great britian, Australia, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Estonia, Israel, Hungary. This is a sad testimony to the liberalization of a country. China and the Soviet Union will increase in power and dominance whil America falls into a dung heap of stupidity. Look at the stupidity of the people whom voted for this line of dung. Yes, Scott Brown a former JAG, what a wuss. Burr, another one lacking the cahhones to do anything. 8 republicans broke the ranks
I like this quote from John F. Kennedy-
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preserveration of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life.
I served for this Great Country in Lebanon 1983. It took a coward to blow up the barracks.
Oddly enough it takes the cowards in DC to vote for something that they have no idea about. Carl Levin D-MI endorses this piece of crap. To all FR in MI get out recall petitions to begin a referndum to rid MI of this parasite once and for all.
Dude, while I agree that the language can at times be a little wrong, you are way over the top and incorrect in your assessment of the DADT issue.
With DADT, homosexuals can serve in the military, they just can’t ‘openly’ serve- in other words, they must conform to military standards- they aren’t black, white, pink, yellow, gay, or straight- they are all green. They can’t go around ‘telling’ (ie promoting) what the do any more than someone who may believe in Rastafarianism could openly promote smoking weed in the military. Their belief doesn’t change, it is their action in openly promoting something.
The repeal allows, if not encourages one group to use the military for activism by openly promoting a lifestyle or political point of view. This is something not afforded any other group in the military.
Everyone here has different views on this issue for different reasons, for myself, it is simply about what I stated. The military isn’t about promotion of any lifestyle or political point, it is about killing the enemy. DADT kept it to that. If you kill the enemy and don’t use the military as a platform to promote X view, you can stay. As soon as you start ‘telling’- ie using the military to promote your view, you are out. The same can be said about a lot of lifestyles and beliefs in the military.
The real issue is not whether an occasional random Freeper believes it's not important, but whether a sufficient number of the American electorate believes that way.
Whether or not there is a debate on FR, there must be a debate in America at large if yesterday's action is to be reversed.
I haven’t seen support for the homosexual agenda from anyone who served or intends to. Basically, it’s non participants telling others how to live, a common attribute of liberal policies.
...”There is nothing “reasonable” that prevents homosexuals from fighting for our country.” -rusty
*******
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE DSM
The DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) is the most widely used diagnostic reference book utilized by mental health professionals in the United States.
It’s a manual by which all diagnostic codes are derived for diagnosis and treatment - every single physician (an estimated 850,000*) in the United States refers to this book in order to code for a diagnosis. In plain English, what does this mean? It means that for over 30 years physicians have been prevented from properly diagnosing homosexuality as an aberrant behavior and thus, cannot, recommend a course of treatment for these individuals.
Prior to that time, homosexuality had been treated as a mental disorder under section “302. Sexual Deviations” in the DSM-II. Section 302 said, in part: “This category is for individuals whose sexual interests are directed primarily toward objects other than people of the opposite sex, toward sexual acts … performed under bizarre circumstances. … Even though many find their practices distasteful, they remain unable to substitute normal sexual behavior for them.” Homosexuality was listed as the first sexual deviation under 302. Once that diagnostic code for homosexuality was removed, physicians, including psychiatrists, have been prevented from diagnosing homosexuality as a mental disorder for more than three decades.
1)There is a huge difference between “allowing” and “forcing”. The Constitution allows blacks to go to schools which were once considered to be whites only. Radical courts forced busing in the 1970’s.
2)With all due respect, homosexualism is not word. I think you mean homosexuality. Your malapropism doesn’t make us look any smarter. Next, you will be complaining about the “off-the-dock Jews” or the “UFO-CIA”
3) If you eliminate everyone who doesn’t agree 100%, you narrow our power and our free flowing exchange of ideas. It is intellectual inbreeding, which reduces Free Republic to the backwoods kissing cousins areas of New Hampshire. Is this what you want?
I wasn’t mocking him. I was stating a fact. If I really wanted to mock him, I’d say I’m going for a walk. If he feels that I was mocking his disability, I wholeheartedly apologize.
Says the West Virginia poster. ‘Nuff said.
Rusty - well written, thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.