Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
Thank You.
BUMP
ROFLMFWCSAO!
Merry Christmas, Jim.
8^D
Westboro Babptist is loving this thread.
He spent 5 years on a sub, can you imagine what that will be like with this new law.
The lawyers are already thinking of new law suits to file based on sexual abuse, discrimination, lack of promotion, and so many evil things just waiting to happen.
Another step in the ruination of our great Country.
The USA can kick the hell out of hitler, beat the old soviets, beat the hell out of the vietcong, {we killed over 1,000,000 of those slants, but our politicians sold us out}, but over and over, it is our own politicians that destroy this country.
If I wrote what is in my mind right now, there would be feds kicking my door down.
I haven't seen any either. But we do have those who support homo agenda-supporting (future) GOP Presidential candidates.
John Bolton supports "gay" "marriage", refuses to address the moral questions posed by abortion
Hey, now!
He was my favorite character in the movie!
:))
Jim's House
Jim's Rules.
P.S. - Wipe your feet.
LOL!!!
AMEN
It’;s high time that some stopped calling them conservatives and come on here and then preach the pro homosexual agenda.
Well done Jim and thank you for this site.
Now for you pro homosexual agenda types who “know a homosexual and they are nice” crap.
You have to figure out what you are, conservative or liberal, pro commie, pro homosexual agenda...
I have quite a lot of personal and direct interaction with the rank & file in our Armed Forces . I have asked many young soldiers and Marines how they felt about the repeal of DADT over the last year . One young Marine expressed himself this way : “ When they let me billet with female Marines and when they lef t me shower with female Marines I will be ok with them letting gays serve openly in my Company . Until and unless they do that , FORGET IT! “ To which many other Marines standing nearby stated “ Hoo-rah” and “ you got that right !” The folks at the tip of the spear , the folks taking the hits , the folks out there doing the face-to-face killing for us , the folks out there living in the little mud huts and tents ,and be forced to sleep close due to the extreme cold ...THEY DO NOT WANT THIS REPEAL. The idiots like Joe F-Head Liebermann , have NO RIGHT to force this on our straight men & women in the combat arms branches of the Armed Forces . No right .
It isn’t right and enormous problems are going to result from this stupid , ill-advised decision , arrived at under pressure by the muddy helmet mafia .
Westboro Babptist is loving this thread.
Important, for clarity’s sake, via the Conservapedia:
“...the goals and means of this movement include indoctrinating students in public school, restricting the free speech of opposition, obtaining special treatment for homosexuals, distorting Biblical teaching and science, and interfering with freedom of association.”
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-102.ZD.html
Justice Scalia, in his dissenting opinion in Lawrence v. Texas (2003), wrote:
“Today’s opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct...
“It is clear from this that the Court has taken sides in the culture war, departing from its role of assuring, as neutral observer, that the democratic rules of engagement are observed. Many Americans do not want persons who openly engage in homosexual conduct as partners in their business, as scoutmasters for their children, as teachers in their children’s schools, or as boarders in their home.
“They view this as protecting themselves and their families from a lifestyle that they believe to be immoral and destructive. The Court views it as “discrimination” which it is the function of our judgments to deter. So imbued is the Court with the law profession’s anti-anti-homosexual culture, that it is seemingly unaware that the attitudes of that culture are not obviously “mainstream”; that in most States what the Court calls “discrimination” against those who engage in homosexual acts is perfectly legal...
“...that in some cases such “discrimination” is mandated by federal statute, (such as) mandating discharge from the armed forces of any service member who engages in or intends to engage in homosexual acts); and that in some cases such “discrimination” is a constitutional right, (such as with the) Boy Scouts of America (and the right of free association.)
“But persuading one’s fellow citizens is one thing, and imposing one’s views in absence of democratic majority will is something else. What Texas has chosen to do is well within the range of traditional democratic action, and its hand should not be stayed through the invention of a brand-new “constitutional right” by a Court that is impatient of democratic change.”
Geez Joe, you need a change of venue!
“I have to spend the holidays with the in laws, one is a flaming militant gay. I won’t be holding any punches this year. The good news is I doubt they will be inviting me back.”
That always works for me, with in-laws, co-workers and acquaintances. I sometimes read (like in a post up above here somewhere) “we should engage them” ... well ... you do it. I just let em know what I think and the engagement is off. No pun intended. The wife gets a little ticked off once in a while, especially if it’s a big gathering or a family thing, but screw em ... if they bring it up, I’ll bring em down. If you don’t say it, it festers anyway.
And “they won’t invite me back” holds no threat to me listening to some prancing fairy discuss his shrink’s opinions on whatever the hell is the topic of conversation.
Say a prayer for all of us. Anything that weakens our military weakens us all.
Tents and hooches now will be mighty upscale!
Now the fight begins to overturn this repeal and let us get back to a normal traditional family, pro military with no homosexuals running around holding hands on base or dressing as women on base.
Let the GOP they had better now fight for this and if they do not like a handful of senators i.e. Brown etc did not then they are fired.
It’s high time to talk publicly about their agenda and that goes for the cowards like Hannity who will not show their folsom fair or talk about it asking listeners to make calls.
Bump
Exactly. It’s destroying the family, it will destroy the military as an effective fighting force, it’s destroying the fabric of this nation’s society. This nation is unique in being designed on God-given principles and the forces of Satan have been at work since the start to destroy it, to change our position as the “shining city on a hill” of our forefathers. The very act of sodomy is destructive, and the more clues they get, the more their hearts are hardened in rebellion. No wonder God calls it “abomination”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.