Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!
Jim Robinson

Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 50mmisasackofshit; 50mmisgay; bugzapper; darkwing104isapos; darkwing104isgay; homosexualagenda; romney; romneysucks; undeadthread; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 3,181-3,197 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Thank You.


61 posted on 12/18/2010 11:52:20 AM PST by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

BUMP


62 posted on 12/18/2010 11:52:44 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Rolling On Floor Laughing My Fat, White, Conservative, Straight Ass Off!

ROFLMFWCSAO!

Merry Christmas, Jim.

8^D

63 posted on 12/18/2010 11:53:17 AM PST by Gargantua (Palin ~ Bachmann 2012... cuz "Pa-Bach's a bitch!" (if you're a Liberal or a PDS snart))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Westboro Babptist is loving this thread.


64 posted on 12/18/2010 11:53:38 AM PST by adamjefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
After today's vote in the senate, I'm so grateful that my son, a 24 year Navy vet is hanging it up in 2011.

He spent 5 years on a sub, can you imagine what that will be like with this new law.

The lawyers are already thinking of new law suits to file based on sexual abuse, discrimination, lack of promotion, and so many evil things just waiting to happen.

Another step in the ruination of our great Country.

The USA can kick the hell out of hitler, beat the old soviets, beat the hell out of the vietcong, {we killed over 1,000,000 of those slants, but our politicians sold us out}, but over and over, it is our own politicians that destroy this country.

If I wrote what is in my mind right now, there would be feds kicking my door down.

65 posted on 12/18/2010 11:54:56 AM PST by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Do we really have fag apologist/supporters here? I hadn’t seen any

I haven't seen any either. But we do have those who support homo agenda-supporting (future) GOP Presidential candidates.

John Bolton supports "gay" "marriage", refuses to address the moral questions posed by abortion

66 posted on 12/18/2010 11:54:58 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Hey, now!

He was my favorite character in the movie!

:))


67 posted on 12/18/2010 11:55:02 AM PST by Salamander (Can't sleep....the clowns will eat me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
If you support the homosexual or any of the other radical leftist agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals and other citizens already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals, liberals, minorities and other wierdos any special rights.

Jim's House

Jim's Rules.

P.S. - Wipe your feet.

68 posted on 12/18/2010 11:55:14 AM PST by MindBender26 (Fighting the "con" in Conservatism on FR since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AzSteven
Blast it! Don't you know that snorting Mountain Dew out your nose hurts!

LOL!!!

69 posted on 12/18/2010 11:55:44 AM PST by Stonewall Jackson (Democrats: "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

AMEN
It’;s high time that some stopped calling them conservatives and come on here and then preach the pro homosexual agenda.

Well done Jim and thank you for this site.

Now for you pro homosexual agenda types who “know a homosexual and they are nice” crap.
You have to figure out what you are, conservative or liberal, pro commie, pro homosexual agenda...


70 posted on 12/18/2010 11:55:58 AM PST by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I have quite a lot of personal and direct interaction with the rank & file in our Armed Forces . I have asked many young soldiers and Marines how they felt about the repeal of DADT over the last year . One young Marine expressed himself this way : “ When they let me billet with female Marines and when they lef t me shower with female Marines I will be ok with them letting gays serve openly in my Company . Until and unless they do that , FORGET IT! “ To which many other Marines standing nearby stated “ Hoo-rah” and “ you got that right !” The folks at the tip of the spear , the folks taking the hits , the folks out there doing the face-to-face killing for us , the folks out there living in the little mud huts and tents ,and be forced to sleep close due to the extreme cold ...THEY DO NOT WANT THIS REPEAL. The idiots like Joe F-Head Liebermann , have NO RIGHT to force this on our straight men & women in the combat arms branches of the Armed Forces . No right .
It isn’t right and enormous problems are going to result from this stupid , ill-advised decision , arrived at under pressure by the muddy helmet mafia .


71 posted on 12/18/2010 11:56:06 AM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamjefferson

Westboro Babptist is loving this thread.

64 posted on Saturday, December 18, 2010 1:53:38 PM by adamjefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

 
 
______________________________________________________
 
Say what?


72 posted on 12/18/2010 11:57:27 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Important, for clarity’s sake, via the Conservapedia:

“...the goals and means of this movement include indoctrinating students in public school, restricting the free speech of opposition, obtaining special treatment for homosexuals, distorting Biblical teaching and science, and interfering with freedom of association.”

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-102.ZD.html

Justice Scalia, in his dissenting opinion in Lawrence v. Texas (2003), wrote:

“Today’s opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct...

“It is clear from this that the Court has taken sides in the culture war, departing from its role of assuring, as neutral observer, that the democratic rules of engagement are observed. Many Americans do not want persons who openly engage in homosexual conduct as partners in their business, as scoutmasters for their children, as teachers in their children’s schools, or as boarders in their home.

“They view this as protecting themselves and their families from a lifestyle that they believe to be immoral and destructive. The Court views it as “discrimination” which it is the function of our judgments to deter. So imbued is the Court with the law profession’s anti-anti-homosexual culture, that it is seemingly unaware that the attitudes of that culture are not obviously “mainstream”; that in most States what the Court calls “discrimination” against those who engage in homosexual acts is perfectly legal...

“...that in some cases such “discrimination” is mandated by federal statute, (such as) mandating discharge from the armed forces of any service member who engages in or intends to engage in homosexual acts); and that in some cases such “discrimination” is a constitutional right, (such as with the) Boy Scouts of America (and the right of free association.)

“But persuading one’s fellow citizens is one thing, and imposing one’s views in absence of democratic majority will is something else. What Texas has chosen to do is well within the range of traditional democratic action, and its hand should not be stayed through the invention of a brand-new “constitutional right” by a Court that is impatient of democratic change.”


73 posted on 12/18/2010 11:57:35 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
...out of the thousands of fags I have met ...

Geez Joe, you need a change of venue!

74 posted on 12/18/2010 11:57:40 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

“I have to spend the holidays with the in laws, one is a flaming militant gay. I won’t be holding any punches this year. The good news is I doubt they will be inviting me back.”

That always works for me, with in-laws, co-workers and acquaintances. I sometimes read (like in a post up above here somewhere) “we should engage them” ... well ... you do it. I just let em know what I think and the engagement is off. No pun intended. The wife gets a little ticked off once in a while, especially if it’s a big gathering or a family thing, but screw em ... if they bring it up, I’ll bring em down. If you don’t say it, it festers anyway.

And “they won’t invite me back” holds no threat to me listening to some prancing fairy discuss his shrink’s opinions on whatever the hell is the topic of conversation.


75 posted on 12/18/2010 11:57:59 AM PST by jessduntno (Care what the Left thinks of you? "Their opinion of me and my policies is irrelevant." - Dick Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Say a prayer for all of us. Anything that weakens our military weakens us all.


76 posted on 12/18/2010 11:58:28 AM PST by JPG (Sarah dedicated her new book to Trig: "I'm glad you're here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Well, there go all the good answers to any interior design vanity questions.

Tents and hooches now will be mighty upscale!

77 posted on 12/18/2010 11:58:37 AM PST by Ole Okie (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: marmar

Now the fight begins to overturn this repeal and let us get back to a normal traditional family, pro military with no homosexuals running around holding hands on base or dressing as women on base.

Let the GOP they had better now fight for this and if they do not like a handful of senators i.e. Brown etc did not then they are fired.
It’s high time to talk publicly about their agenda and that goes for the cowards like Hannity who will not show their folsom fair or talk about it asking listeners to make calls.


78 posted on 12/18/2010 11:59:13 AM PST by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Bump


79 posted on 12/18/2010 11:59:43 AM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Exactly. It’s destroying the family, it will destroy the military as an effective fighting force, it’s destroying the fabric of this nation’s society. This nation is unique in being designed on God-given principles and the forces of Satan have been at work since the start to destroy it, to change our position as the “shining city on a hill” of our forefathers. The very act of sodomy is destructive, and the more clues they get, the more their hearts are hardened in rebellion. No wonder God calls it “abomination”.


80 posted on 12/18/2010 12:00:44 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 3,181-3,197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson