Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin's doing a nice job tonight in her Hannity appearance tonight

Posted on 11/22/2010 7:17:11 PM PST by cycle of discernment

Very much in command of the facts, quick, firm and clear.

A bit less folksy, yakkity blather and more to the point with a more 'serious' demeanor. Which is good.

If I could give one word of advice to this talented and quick-minded woman, I would tell her to rachet down the bubbly quotient slightly.

She needs to be perceived as serious.... blending with her natural accessibility and warm personality.

She needs to occasionally set her jaw in conviction without breaking into the girly smile and deliver her obviously deeply held positions with authority.

She's got the content down 110%, if she'd just add more seriousness to her delivery...the trick is, such seriousness can't be contrived and should not replace her natural ebullience, wholesale--she needs to retain her authenticity--but a serious tone should be an additive feature, unflappable and strategically deployed.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: chat; hannity; palin; palincult; palinvanity; sarahpalin; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last
To: acapesket

No holier than thou stuff going on with me.

I posted in good faith...I am genuinely concerned that she cannot gain far-reaching traction if she does not add more authority to her delivery.


21 posted on 11/22/2010 7:48:16 PM PST by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: earlJam; pissant
You pissant’s great grandson or pissant with a new screen name?
22 posted on 11/22/2010 7:49:44 PM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Biggest negative... “TINA FEY”.


23 posted on 11/22/2010 7:49:48 PM PST by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
“She needs to be perceived as serious....”

Whereas I understand your point, and agree with the pragmatism behind your premise, I am really sick of people mistaking form for substance (I don't mean you, I just mean in general). I would much rather have a high power CPU hooked up to an average printer, than to have a less advanced CPU hooked up to a high-end printer. The smartest people I've known in life were not necessarily the most polished, and most have the ability to not take themselves too seriously. The fact that our nation has become obsessed with form over substance is why, without proper vetting, Obama got elected. Eloquence does not equal aptitude. I doubt there is much of a correlation at all.

24 posted on 11/22/2010 7:50:55 PM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
First of all, her show is not a Reality Show and secondly, her kids are not "public property". That sounds like Dem talking points.

Wait until she declares she is running for President and is dragging her kids along the campaign trail with her, then you may have a point and we'll talk.

25 posted on 11/22/2010 7:51:58 PM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
I'm sorry, Balata, as much as I support Sarah, when she put her family on a reality show, they became "public property".

I guess you've been on an island for the past year and a half? You think the MSM hasn't used them and defiled them before this?

Meh.

26 posted on 11/22/2010 7:52:21 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross
Apparently he does apparently.

Just kidding. Really, I was just kidding. No seriously, I couldn't have been kidding any more if I tried. LOL

27 posted on 11/22/2010 7:52:59 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (If Sarah Palin was President, you would have a job by now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: earlJam

She needs to study the Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher. What a leader she was!


28 posted on 11/22/2010 7:52:59 PM PST by Gapplega
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: earlJam

Not in and of itself. It does, however, speak to something that is critical to the limited government movement. Strength.

Add that to intelligence and the fact that she has the ability to connect with regular people (as opposed to self described intellectuals) and you’ve got a winner.


29 posted on 11/22/2010 7:53:10 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Excellent and fair assessment, and fortunately, her heretofore shrill delivery has diminished considerably. Both my wife and I read her book and read the text of her interviews. We love her Conservative Reaganesque politics and her love of America, but my wife will not listen to her speak.


30 posted on 11/22/2010 7:53:50 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Be careful not to change what makes her so special. I just think she should be herself. When people get to know the real her, they will see past the MSM fake stereotype of her.

if she runs a good campaign, she can be our President in two years.


31 posted on 11/22/2010 7:54:11 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative ("Hell, theres no question who will win" Woody Hayes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

“A bit less folksy, yakkity blather and more to the point with a more ‘serious’ demeanor. Which is good. “

I couldn’t put my finger on it, but you have nailed it!

It would also be helpful if she kept her voice on a
more even tone. When she’s on a roll, she’ll get that “Hillary shriek” thing goin on.

I am a Palin fan because she IS a Reagan Conservative.


32 posted on 11/22/2010 7:54:29 PM PST by alice_in_bubbaland (DeMint/Ryan 2012!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: acapesket

Agree.

I despise Tina Fey. A two-bit entertainer, petty, snarky, all-round snide and wholly unattractive jackass. All puffed up in her little fleeting fame world of destroying the aspirations of a good and decent human being.

She represents everything I hate about today’s clueless ultra”hip” entertainers.

Gawd, the little mouse makes me ill.


33 posted on 11/22/2010 7:54:47 PM PST by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: earlJam
Sarah has to get more serious. She can’t win a general election unless she does. She may have a hard time winning the GOP nomination unless she does. The goofy, folksy thing for me is getting kind of old.

I agree, I love her, but we are talking about the president of the United States not homecoming queen. We are living right now with what happens when you elect someone who isn't qualified just because they loved him. People need to think real hard about her as the Republican candidate and what her chances would be. She would have an uphill fight and if she loses (and odds are she would) we are stuck with Obama. I know that isn't popular to say around here, but people are entitled to think about other qualified candidates without getting flamed out of here.
34 posted on 11/22/2010 7:55:02 PM PST by kezzek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
I guess you've been on an island for the past year and a half?

Yeah, they voted him off when he couldn't correctly identify what was a reality show and what wasn't. The tribal council doesn't take that kind of thing lightly.

35 posted on 11/22/2010 7:55:42 PM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

Agree. She needs to retain her authenticity but add more authority.


36 posted on 11/22/2010 7:55:59 PM PST by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

Nah, no relations. I wouldn’t beat around the bush like that. No matter how she answers the Hannity softballs - stern jaw, scowl, or typical deer in the headlights smile - she’d be a bad choice for our nominee.


37 posted on 11/22/2010 7:56:57 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Balata
She needs to stop talking about her family and trying to justify every thing they do.

If she is talking about her family she is on defense and not offense.

She needs to just tell reporters her family is off limits.

.

Agreed. She's got the wholesome family shtick covered with her Alaskan TV series.

38 posted on 11/22/2010 7:58:01 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

my goodness, you are NOT a Palin fan. those of us that are stay loyal to her


39 posted on 11/22/2010 7:58:50 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative ("Hell, theres no question who will win" Woody Hayes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kezzek

homecoming queen ?

B.S.

Thats sexist and rather low.


40 posted on 11/22/2010 8:00:43 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative ("Hell, theres no question who will win" Woody Hayes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson